Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Choice. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that.

Published byMuriel Lawrence Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Choice. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that."— Presentation transcript:

1 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Choice

2 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those available to it. u The available choices constitute the choice set. u How is the most preferred bundle in the choice set located?

3 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2

4 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 4 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 Utility

5 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x2x2 x1x1

6 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 6 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 Utility

7 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 7 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

8 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 8 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

9 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 9 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

10 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 10 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

11 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 11 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2 Affordable, but not the most preferred affordable bundle.

12 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 12 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 Utility Affordable, but not the most preferred affordable bundle. The most preferred of the affordable bundles.

13 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 13 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 Utility

14 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 14 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

15 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 15 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

16 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 16 Rational Constrained Choice Utility x1x1 x2x2

17 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 17 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2

18 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 18 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 Affordable bundles

19 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 Affordable bundles

20 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 20 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 Affordable bundles More preferred bundles

21 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 21 Rational Constrained Choice Affordable bundles x1x1 x2x2 More preferred bundles

22 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 x1*x1* x2*x2*

23 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 23 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 x1*x1* x2*x2* (x 1 *,x 2 *) is the most preferred affordable bundle.

24 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 24 Rational Constrained Choice u The most preferred affordable bundle is called the consumer’s ORDINARY DEMAND at the given prices and budget. u Ordinary demands will be denoted by x 1 *(p 1,p 2,m) and x 2 *(p 1,p 2,m).

25 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 25 Rational Constrained Choice u When x 1 * > 0 and x 2 * > 0 the demanded bundle is INTERIOR. u If buying (x 1 *,x 2 *) costs $m then the budget is exhausted.

26 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 26 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 x1*x1* x2*x2* (x 1 *,x 2 *) is interior. (x 1 *,x 2 *) exhausts the budget.

27 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 27 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 x1*x1* x2*x2* (x 1 *,x 2 *) is interior. (a) (x 1 *,x 2 *) exhausts the budget; p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m.

28 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 28 Rational Constrained Choice x1x1 x2x2 x1*x1* x2*x2* (x 1 *,x 2 *) is interior. (b) The slope of the indiff. curve at (x 1 *,x 2 *) equals the slope of the budget constraint.

29 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 29 Rational Constrained Choice u (x 1 *,x 2 *) satisfies two conditions: u (a) the budget is exhausted; p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m u (b) the slope of the budget constraint, -p 1 /p 2, and the slope of the indifference curve containing (x 1 *,x 2 *) are equal at (x 1 *,x 2 *).

30 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 30 Computing Ordinary Demands u How can this information be used to locate (x 1 *,x 2 *) for given p 1, p 2 and m?

31 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 31 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences.

32 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 32 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences. u Then

33 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 33 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u So the MRS is

34 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 34 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u So the MRS is u At (x 1 *,x 2 *), MRS = -p 1 /p 2 so

35 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 35 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u So the MRS is u At (x 1 *,x 2 *), MRS = -p 1 /p 2 so (A)

36 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 36 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u (x 1 *,x 2 *) also exhausts the budget so (B)

37 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 37 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u So now we know that (A) (B)

38 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 38 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u So now we know that (A) (B) Substitute

39 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 39 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. u So now we know that (A) (B) Substitute and get This simplifies to ….

40 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 40 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example.

41 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 41 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. Substituting for x 1 * in then gives

42 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 42 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. So we have discovered that the most preferred affordable bundle for a consumer with Cobb-Douglas preferences is

43 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 43 Computing Ordinary Demands - a Cobb-Douglas Example. x1x1 x2x2

44 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 44 Rational Constrained Choice u When x 1 * > 0 and x 2 * > 0 and (x 1 *,x 2 *) exhausts the budget, and indifference curves have no ‘kinks’, the ordinary demands are obtained by solving: u (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = y u (b) the slopes of the budget constraint, -p 1 /p 2, and of the indifference curve containing (x 1 *,x 2 *) are equal at (x 1 *,x 2 *).

45 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 45 Rational Constrained Choice u But what if x 1 * = 0? u Or if x 2 * = 0? u If either x 1 * = 0 or x 2 * = 0 then the ordinary demand (x 1 *,x 2 *) is at a corner solution to the problem of maximizing utility subject to a budget constraint.

46 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 46 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -1

47 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 47 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -1 Slope = -p 1 /p 2 with p 1 > p 2.

48 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 48 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -1 Slope = -p 1 /p 2 with p 1 > p 2.

49 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 49 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -1 Slope = -p 1 /p 2 with p 1 > p 2.

50 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 50 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -1 Slope = -p 1 /p 2 with p 1 < p 2.

51 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 51 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case So when U(x 1,x 2 ) = x 1 + x 2, the most preferred affordable bundle is (x 1 *,x 2 *) where and if p 1 < p 2 if p 1 > p 2.

52 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 52 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -1 Slope = -p 1 /p 2 with p 1 = p 2.

53 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 53 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Perfect Substitutes Case x1x1 x2x2 All the bundles in the constraint are equally the most preferred affordable when p 1 = p 2.

54 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 54 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Non-Convex Preferences Case x1x1 x2x2 Better

55 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 55 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Non-Convex Preferences Case x1x1 x2x2

56 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 56 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Non-Convex Preferences Case x1x1 x2x2 Which is the most preferred affordable bundle?

57 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 57 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Non-Convex Preferences Case x1x1 x2x2 The most preferred affordable bundle

58 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 58 Examples of Corner Solutions -- the Non-Convex Preferences Case x1x1 x2x2 The most preferred affordable bundle Notice that the “tangency solution” is not the most preferred affordable bundle.

59 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 59 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1

60 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 60 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = 0 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1

61 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 61 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -  MRS = 0 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1

62 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 62 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 MRS = -  MRS = 0 MRS is undefined U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1

63 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 63 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1

64 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 64 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1 Which is the most preferred affordable bundle?

65 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 65 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1 The most preferred affordable bundle

66 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 66 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1 x1*x1* x2*x2*

67 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 67 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1 x1*x1* x2*x2* (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m

68 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 68 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1 x1*x1* x2*x2* (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m (b) x 2 * = ax 1 *

69 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 69 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m; (b) x 2 * = ax 1 *.

70 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 70 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m; (b) x 2 * = ax 1 *. Substitution from (b) for x 2 * in (a) gives p 1 x 1 * + p 2 ax 1 * = m

71 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 71 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m; (b) x 2 * = ax 1 *. Substitution from (b) for x 2 * in (a) gives p 1 x 1 * + p 2 ax 1 * = m which gives

72 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 72 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m; (b) x 2 * = ax 1 *. Substitution from (b) for x 2 * in (a) gives p 1 x 1 * + p 2 ax 1 * = m which gives

73 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 73 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case (a) p 1 x 1 * + p 2 x 2 * = m; (b) x 2 * = ax 1 *. Substitution from (b) for x 2 * in (a) gives p 1 x 1 * + p 2 ax 1 * = m which gives A bundle of 1 commodity 1 unit and a commodity 2 units costs p 1 + ap 2 ; m/(p 1 + ap 2 ) such bundles are affordable.

74 © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 74 Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions -- the Perfect Complements Case x1x1 x2x2 U(x 1,x 2 ) = min{ax 1,x 2 } x 2 = ax 1

Download ppt "© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5 Choice. © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2 Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that."

Similar presentations

UTILITY MAXIMIZATION AND CHOICE

UTILITY MAXIMIZATION AND CHOICE
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.

Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Choice.

Choice.
Combinations (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2) provide the same level of utility

Combinations (X1, Y1) and (X2, Y2) provide the same level of utility
Economic Rationality The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those available to it. The.

Economic Rationality The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those available to it. The.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.

Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Chapter Three Preferences.

Chapter Three Preferences.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.

Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Utility Functions A utility function U(x) represents a preference relation if and only if: x’ x” U(x’) > U(x”) x’ x” U(x’) < U(x”) x’  x” U(x’) = U(x”).

Utility Functions A utility function U(x) represents a preference relation if and only if: x’ x” U(x’) > U(x”) x’ x” U(x’) < U(x”) x’  x” U(x’) = U(x”).
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.

Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.
Choice. Q: What is the Optimal Choice? Budget constraint Indifference curves More preferred bundles.

Choice. Q: What is the Optimal Choice? Budget constraint Indifference curves More preferred bundles.
Choice Continued.

Choice Continued.
Chapter Five Choice.

Chapter Five Choice.
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.

Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: An economic decisionmaker always chooses her most preferred alternative from.

Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: An economic decisionmaker always chooses her most preferred alternative from.
Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.

Chapter Five Choice. Economic Rationality u The principal behavioral postulate is that a decisionmaker chooses its most preferred alternative from those.
Utility Maximization and Choice

Utility Maximization and Choice
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/1 Chapter 3 Demand Theory.

© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 3/1 Chapter 3 Demand Theory.
Consumer Choice Theory Principles of Microeconomics 2023 Boris Nikolaev.

Consumer Choice Theory Principles of Microeconomics 2023 Boris Nikolaev.
Chapter Five Choice 选择. Structure 5.1 The optimal choice of consumers 5.2 Consumer demand  Interior solution （内解）  Corner solution （角解）  “Kinky” solution.

Chapter Five Choice 选择. Structure 5.1 The optimal choice of consumers 5.2 Consumer demand  Interior solution （内解）  Corner solution （角解）  “Kinky” solution.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google