1. 9. Towards a full evaluation for Cu-65 Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning 1,2 1 Division of Applied Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2 Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NRG), Petten, The Netherlands Email: koning@nrg.eu PhD course on Nuclear reactions and nuclear reaction modeling with TALYS, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, November 13 – 20, 2014

2. Exercise: Complete the following input file for the best description of Cu-65 2 # # (n,p), (n,2n), (n,np) # rvadjust p xxx gnadjust 29 66 xxx gpadjust 29 66 xxx aadjust 28 65 xxx aadjust 28 64 xxx pshift 28 64 xxx # # (n,a) # Cstrip a xxx Cknock a xxx # # (n,g) # gamgamadjust 29 66 xxx Projectile n Element cu Mass 65 Energy energies Channels y Filechannels y # # General # ldmodel 2 m2constant xxx # # (n,tot), (n,el), (n,inl) # rvadjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 xxx v1adjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 xxx d3adjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 xxx d1adjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 xxx core 1

3. This is my input file for the best description of Cu-65 3 # # (n,p), (n,2n), (n,np) # rvadjust p 1.02 gnadjust 29 66 1.15 gpadjust 29 66 1.15 aadjust 28 65 0.90 aadjust 28 64 0.80 pshift 28 64 1.80 # # (n,a) # Cstrip a 0.85 Cknock a 0.85 # # (n,g) # gamgamadjust 29 66 0.60 # # General # ldmodel 2 m2constant 1.40 # # (n,tot), (n,el), (n,inl) # rvadjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 1.01 v1adjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 1.02 d3adjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 1.10 d1adjust n 1. 0.1 2.0 1.0 0.95 core 1