1. HFA R EVIEW 2009-2011 P HILIPPINES Ronald I. Flores Director, Office of Civil Defense Philippines

2. T HE R EVIEW P ROCESS Before the national consultation, a survey form was prepared and farmed out to various government agencies (33 agencies) and NGOs to gather inputs on their DRR past and current activities. Conducted a 2-day multi-stakeholder consultation on the implementation of the HFA 2009-2011, in November 2010 (attended by 22 GOs, 6 NGOs, academic sector, ASEAN Secretariat, international organization). Considerations included not only HFA but also AADMER as a regional binding instrument, HFA 2007-20009, and Philippine SNAP.

3. THE REVIEW PROCESS Prepared the Interim Country Report based on the results of the consultation as well as inputs from the survey (15 March 2010) Interim Country Report to be disseminated to the members of the Technical Management Group of the NDRRM for their inputs and feedback as well as to relevant stakeholders. Finalization of the country report and then submission for adoption by the NDRRMC in April 2011.

4. A GENCIES I NVOLVED I N M ULTI - STAKEHOLDER C ONSULTATION Government Agencies 1. OCD as secretariat of NDRRMC 2. DOH 3. AFP 4. DILG 5. DFA 6. PAGASA- DOST 7. PHIVOLCS- DOST 8. PCIEERD- DOST 9. BFP 10. DepEd 11. DPWH 12. DTI Other Orgs 23. OXFAM 24. EMI 25. ASEP-PICE 26. GTZ 27. World Vision 28. PRC 29. Miriam College 30. ASEAN Secretariat 31. UNISDR 13. NEDA 14. DA 15. PIA 16. MMDA 17. DOTC 18. PCG 19. LCP 20. DFA 21. Climate Change Commission 22. DOLE

5. M AJOR O UTCOME OF THE C ONSULTATIONS Priority ActionProgress Priority action 1: Ensure that disaster risk reduction is a national and local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation 3.8 Priority action 2: Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance early warning 3.4 Priority action 3: Use knowledge, innovation and education to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels 3.2 Priority action 4: Reduce the underlying risk factors 2.7 Priority action 5: Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels 3.8 Over-all Ratings3.35

6. K EY I NDICATORS Generic descriptionLevel Achievements are minor and there are few signs of planning or forward action to improve the situation. 1 Achievements have been made but are incomplete, and while improvements are planned, the commitment and capacities are limited. 2 There is some institutional commitment and capacities to achieving DRR but progress is not comprehensive or substantial. 3 Substantial achievement has been attained, but with some recognised deficiencies in commitment, financial resources or operational capacities. 4 Comprehensive achievement has been attained, with the commitment and capacities to sustain efforts at all levels 5

7. I NTERIM R ESULTS FOR THE 5 P RIORITY A REAS

8. HFA P RIORITY A REA 1: G OVERNANCE Average Score: 3.8 Substantial achievement has been attained, but with some recognized deficiencies in commitment, financial resources or operational capacities.

9. HFA P RIORITY A REA 2: R ISK A SSESSMENT AND EARLY WARNING Average Score: 3.4 (There is some institutional commitment and capacities to achieving DRR but progress is not comprehensive or substantial.) 3.5 3.3 3.0 3.8

10. HFA P RIORITY A REA 3: K NOWLEDGE M ANAGEMENT Average Score: 3.2 (There is some institutional commitment and capacities to achieving DRR but progress is not comprehensive or substantial.) 3.3 3.0

11. HFA Priority Area 4: Vulnerability Reduction Average Score: 2.7 (There is some institutional commitment and capacities to achieving DRR but progress is not comprehensive or substantial.) 3.3 2.0 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.3

12. HFA Priority Area 5: Disaster Preparedness Average Score: 3.8 Substantial achievement has been attained, but with some recognized deficiencies in commitment, financial resources or operational capacities.

13. WAY FORWARD Continue to map resources (e.g. organizations involved in DRR and their initiatives). Establish project database on DRR. Conduct regular/annual multi-stakeholder workshop to share information on DRR initiatives. Determine complementation of projects/activities in DRR to achieve synergy and leveraging of resources. Utilize the assessment results to review the national priorities as laid out in the Philippine Strategic National Action Plan (SNAP) for DRR. Use as a reference to find out entry points for integrating CCA. Use as a basis in formulating the NDRRM Plan. Utilize the HFA monitoring process as basis for the M&E system for the NDRRM Plan.

14. T HANK YOU !!!

17. P RIORITY 1- G OVERNANCE Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 2009- 2011 2007- 2009 National institutional and legal frameworks for DRR exist with decentralized responsibilities and capacities at all levels 4.254.50 4.40 4.00 Dedicated and adequate resources are available to implement DRR plans at all administrative levels 3.203.00 3.20 2.00 Community participation & decentralization are ensured through the delegation of authority & resources to local levels 4.003.002.00 3.00 2.00 A national multisectoral platform for DRR is functioning. 5.004.254.00 4.40 4.00 3.83.00

18. P RIORITY 2- R ISK A SSESSMENT AND E ARLY W ARNING Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 2009- 2011 2007- 2009 National & local risk assessments based on hazard data and vulnerability information are available and include risk assessments for key sectors 4.003.003.503.53 Systems are in place to monitor, archive and disseminate data on key hazards & vulnerabilities 4.003.00 3.32 Early warning systems are in place for all major hazards, with outreach to communities 3.00 3.03 National & local risk assessments take account of transboundary risks, with a view to for regional cooperation on risk reduction 5.003.003.503.82 3.40 2.50

19. P RIORITY 3- K NOWLEDGE M ANAGEMENT Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 2009- 2011 2007- 2009 Relevant information on disasters available is available data at all levels, to all stakeholders through networks, development of information sharing systems, etc) 4.003.00 3.33 School curricula, education material and relevant training include risk reduction and recovery concepts and practices 4.003.00 3.32 Research methods & tools for multi risk assessments and cost benefit analysis are developed and strengthened 2.003.004.003.02 Country-wide public awareness strategy exists to stimulate a culture of disaster resilience with outreach to urban and rural communities 4.003.002.003.02 3.202.30

20. P RIORITY 4- V ULNERABILITY R EDUCTION Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 2009- 2011 2007- 2009 DRR is an integral objective of environment-related policies and plans, including the land use, natural resource management and climate change adaptation 3.503.00 3.303.00 Social development policies and plans are being implemented to reduce the vulnerability of populations most at risk 3.503.00 3.302.00 Economic and productive sectoral policies & plans have been implemented to reduce the vulnerability of economic activities 2.00 2.01.00 Planning & management of human settlements incorporate DRR elements, including enforcement of building codes 3.002.50 2.802.00 DRR measures are integrated into post-recovery & rehabilitation processes 2.50 2.00 Procedures are in place to assess disaster risk impacts of all development projects, especially infrastructure 2.50 2.302.00 2.702.00

21. P RIORITY 5- S TRENGTHEN DISASTER PREPAREDNESS FOR EFFECTIVE RESPONSE AT ALL LEVELS Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 2009- 2011 2007- 2009 DRR is an integral objective of environment-related policies and plans, including the land use, natural resource management and climate change adaptation 3.503.00 3.303.00 Social development policies and plans are being implemented to reduce the vulnerability of populations most at risk 3.503.00 3.302.00 Economic and productive sectoral policies & plans have been implemented to reduce the vulnerability of economic activities 2.00 2.01.00 Planning & management of human settlements incorporate DRR elements, including enforcement of building codes 3.002.50 2.802.00 DRR measures are integrated into post-recovery & rehabilitation processes 2.50 2.00 Procedures are in place to assess disaster risk impacts of all development projects, especially infrastructure 2.50 2.302.00 2.702.00