1. Changes from -07 to -08 ISSUE 11 (and 23): Should clarifying text indicate that the Confirmed candidates, chosen by the standard process, as opposed to mid term appointments, be expected to serve at least 2 years. 312a313,316 > The term of a confirmed candidate selected according to the > mid-term vacancy rules may be less than 2 years, as stated > elsewhere in this document. >

2. ISSUE 8: Is text making it explicit that the maximum assignable term is 3 years needed? 315c319 may assign a term of not more than 3 years in order to ensure the 321,323c325,327 and those sitting) to which it may assign a term of not more than > 3 years to ensure that all such members will not be reviewed at > the same time.

3. ISSUE 25: There is a mention here of a liaison from the ISOC board. But, there in section 4.3 there is a list of NOMCOM members that indicates how they are selected, and the ISOC liaison is not listed. 621c621 volunteers, 3 liaisons, and an advisor. > 644a645,647 > The Internet Society Board of Trustees may appoint a liaison to > the nominating committee at its own discretion. 755,758c758 9. An advisor is responsible for such duties as specified by the

4. ISSUE 9: "all members" wording implies everyone must agree. What is the intent here? Is it "must be approved by a quorum of the committee according to its established voting mechanism"? Note: similar wording appears elsewhere. 625,627c625,627 committee. The addition must be approved by the committee > according to its established voting mechanism. Advisors > participate as individuals. 632,634c632,634 approved by the committee according to its established voting > mechanism. Liaisons participate as representatives of their > respective organizations. 1031,1032c1031,1032 the committee. The rule must be approved by the committee > according to its established voting mechanism.

5. ISSUE 7: The above implies to me that the NOMCOM is required to find a replacement for a resignation, but is not for a recall. Shouldn't the NOMCOM be allowed to also not replace resignations? I.e, I assume that the NOMCOM would have the option of filling or not filling any NOMCOM opening, regardless of how it occurs. 1129,1134c1129,1134 If a voting volunteer member is recalled, regardless of the > circumstances, the committee may choose to proceed with only 9 > voting volunteers at its own discretion. In all other cases the > Chair must repeat the random selection process including an > announcement of the iteration prior to the actual selection as > stated elsewhere in this document.

6. ISSUE 5: Section 5, Point 12 suggests that the committee consult with the sitting members of the IAB and IESG. I think that consultation with WG chairs should be suggested. 1224c1224,1225 Directors, and working group chairs, especially those in the > areas with open positions.

7. ISSUE 4: The recall section makes no provision or even suggestion that the Recall Chair verify the putative signers. 1477a1478,1482 > The IETF Secretariat is responsible for confirming that each > signatory is qualified to be a voting member of a nominating > committee. A valid petition must be signed by at least 20 > qualified signatories. >

8. Editorial ISSUE 6: 1923,1924c1923,1925 2. No person should serve both on the IAB and as an Area Director, > except the IETF Chair whose roles as an IAB member and Area > Director of the General Area are set out elsewhere. ISSUE 12: 349c353 First, when there is only one official nominating committee, the

9. ISSUE 13: 538c542 As of the publication of this document, the current mechanism is ISSUE 18: 587,588c587,588 three meetings), i.e., the IETF meeting after the next > nominating committee's term begins.

10. ISSUE 14: 650c653 committee unless otherwise specified in this document. ISSUE 15: 692c695 may appoint a temporary substitute for the Chair position. EDITORIAL CHANGE NOT LISTED ANYWHERE: 1610,1611c1610,1611 all times except that only voting volunteers vote on a candidate > selection.

11. ISSUE 16: 733,738c733,741 Liaisons from the IESG, IAB, and Internet Society Board of > Trustees (if one was appointed) are expected to review the > operation and executing process of the nominating committee and > to report any concerns or issues to the Chair of the nominating > committee immediately. If they can not resolve the issue > between themselves, liaisons must report the issue to their > respective bodies. If their respective body agrees that there > is an issue the liaison must report it according to the dispute > resolution process stated elsewhere in this document. 769c769 can not resolve the issue between themselves, the prior year's 1153c1153 between themselves, the prior year's Chair must report it