Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClara Burke Modified over 9 years ago
1
Heavy quark ”Energy loss" and ”Flow" in a QCD matter DongJo Kim, Jan Rak Jyväskylä University, Finland Lecture 16
2
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall1 HI collision - Nuclear Modification Factor R AA A+A n x m N binary varies with impact parameter b p+p
3
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall2 Nuclear Geometry and Hydrodynamic flow RP multiple scattering larger pressure gradient in plane less yield out more in plane less yield out more in plane Coordinate space Momentum space Initial Later PRL 91, 182301
4
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall3 v2v2 0.1 0.05 0 v 2 /n q The “Flow” Knows Quarks Assumption: all bulk particles are coming from recombination of flowing partons Discovery of universal scaling : flow parameters scaled by quark content n q resolves meson-baryon separation of final state hadrons. Works for strange and even charm quarks. strongly suggests the early thermalization and quark degree of freedom. v2v2 baryons mesons
5
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall4 PHENIX –Single electron measurements in p+p, d+Au, Au+Au, y~0 s NN = 130,200,62.4 GeV –Single muon measurements in p+p, d+Au,1<|y|<2 s NN = 200 GeV STAR –Direct D mesons hadronic decay channels in d+Au D 0 K π D ± K ππ D* ± D 0 π –Single electron measurements in p+p, d+Au Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 192303 (2002) How to measure Heavy Flavor ? Experimentally observe the decay products of Heavy Flavor particles (e.g. D- mesons) –Hadronic decay channels D K D 0 0 –Semi-leptonic decays D e( ) K e MesonD ±,D 0 Mass1869(1865) GeV BR D 0 --> K + - (3.85 ± 0.10) % BR D --> e + +X17.2(6.7) % BR D --> + +X 6.6 % PHENIX Preliminary (η = 0)
6
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall5 S/B > 1 for p T > 1 GeV/c Run04: X=0.4%, Radiation length Run02: X=1.3% Signal/Background We use two different methods to determine the non-photonic electron contribution (Inclusive = photonic + non-photonic ) Cocktail subtraction – calculation of “photonic” electron background from all known sources Converter subtraction– extraction of “photonic” electron background by special run with additional converter (X = 1.7%) Cocktail subtraction – calculation of “photonic” electron background from all known sources Converter subtraction– extraction of “photonic” electron background by special run with additional converter (X = 1.7%) How to measure Heavy Flavor? Charm/Bottom electrons
7
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall6 Systematic on the measurement Cocktail and converter analysis agrees very well Low pT : Converter High pT : Cocktail S/B > 1 for p T > 2 GeV/c PRL 97(2006) 252002 eID @ RICH Hadronic background Electrons E/p Signal/Background
8
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall7 Heavy Flavor in Au+Au 200GeV No suppression at low p T consistent with N scaling of total charm yield Suppression observed for p T >3.0 GeV/c, smaller than for light quarks( R AA ~ R charm AA ). PRL. 98, 172301 (2007)
9
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall8 Non-photonic electron v 2 measurement Non photonic electron v 2 is given as; v 2 γ.e ; Photonic electron v 2 Cocktail method (simulation) stat. advantage Converter method (experimentally) v 2 e ; Inclusive electron v 2 => Measure R NP = (Non-γ e) / (γ e) => Measure (1) (2)
10
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall9 Photonic e v 2 determination good agreement converter method (experimentally determined) photonic electron v 2 => cocktail of photonic e v 2 R = N X->e / N γe photonic e v 2 (Cocktail) decay v 2 (π 0 ) pT<3 ; π (nucl-ex/0608033) pT>3 ; π 0 (PHENIX run4 prelim.)
11
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall10 Non-zero charm v 2 ? (1) Apply recombination model Assume universal v 2 (p T ) for quark simultaneous fit to v 2 π, v 2 K and v 2 non-γe [PRC 68 044901 Zi-wei & Denes] charm Shape is determined with measured identified particle v 2 universal v 2 (p T ) for quark a,b ; fitting parameters
12
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall11 Non-zero charm v 2 ? (2) χ 2 minimum ; a = 1, b = 0.96 (χ 2 /ndf = 21.85/27) Based on this recombination model, the data suggest non-zero v 2 of charm quark. 2σ 4σ 1σ b ; charm a ; u χ 2 minimum result D->e
13
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall12 Compare with models [PRB637,362] (1) Charm quark thermal + flow (2) large cross section ; ~10 mb (3) Resonance state of D & B in sQGP (4) pQCD [PRC72,024906] [PRC73,034913] [Phys.Lett. B595 202-208 ]
14
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall13 Overview of Theoretical Framework pQCD (1) Radiative energy loss ( GLV, light quarks ) Collisional(elastic) energy loss ( additional 2x2 process ) Still pending issues not solved ( only R AA, Charm/Bottom Ratio ) Relative magnitude of elastic vs radiative loss channels Non-perturbative pQCD (2) Adding nonperturbative hadronic final state interaction effects I.van Vite and A. Adil( Collisional dissociation, R AA ) Van Hees ( recombination, R AA and v 2 ) AdS/CFT Related (3) Partonic radiative transport coeff ( ) : H.Liu, K.Rajagopal,U.A. Wiedemann Diffusion coefficient(D HQ ), R AA and v 2 ) : G.D. Moore, D.Teany W. Horowitz ( more like direct calculation according to ads/CFT ) Double ratio ( R AA (charm)/R AA (bottom) ) Comparison with pQCD
15
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall14 Shear Viscosity( ) to Entropy density( s ) ratio Shear Viscosity( ) to Entropy density( s ) ratio /s ~ 1/4 (4) Diffusion coefficient(D HQ ), R AA and v 2 ) : G.D. Moore, D.Teany Elastic scattering and resonance excitation : Van Hees Ads/CFT itself Hydrodynamics
16
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall15 2003 CTEQ SS - Cacciari Heavy quark mass Suppress radiation in a cone of Θ < m Q /E Dead cone effect No collinear divergence Heavy quarks as a probe parton hot and dense medium light M.Djordjevic PRL 94 (2004) ENERGY LOSS
17
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall16 Elastic energy loss S. Wicks et al., nucl-th/0512076 Partonic Energy Loss Radiative 2 N processes. Final state QCD radiation as in vacuum (p+p coll) - enhanced by QCD medium. Elastic 2 2 LO processes Elastic E models predict significant broadening of away-side correlation peak - not seen in the data. Also various models differ significantly in radiative/elastic fraction.
18
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall17 Electrons Pions s =.3 First results indicate that the elastic energy loss may be important M. G. Mustafa, Phys.Rev.C72:014905,2005 (1)PHENIX,PRL. 98, 172301 (2007) (2) M. G. Mustafa, Phys.Rev.C72:014905,2005 Elastic energy loss is becoming important?
19
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall18 Fragmentation and dissociation of hadrons from heavy quarks inside the QGP 25 fm 1.6 fm 0.4 fm B D QGP extent (3)I. Vitev (A.Adil, I.V., hep-ph/0611109), Phys Lett B649 139-146 2007 Collisional dissociation ?
20
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall19 HQ Energy Loss and Flow Two models describes strong suppression and large v 2 simultaneously Rapp and Van Hees Phys.Rev.C71:034907,2005 Elastic scattering : small τ D HQ × 2πT ~ 4 - 6 Moore and Teaney Phys.Rev.C71:064904,2005 D HQ × 2πT = 3~12 Recall +p = T s at B =0 This then gives /s ~(1.5-3)/4 Within factor of 2 of conjectured bound Phys.Rev.D74,0850012,2006 PRL. 98, 172301 (2007)
21
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall20 Is the quark matter really perfect fluid? Viscosity then defined as. In the standard picture reflects the transport properties of multi-particle system. Small viscosity → Large cross sections Large cross sections → Strong couplings Strong couplings → perturbation theory difficult ! Ideal(perfect, inviscid) fluid =0 String theory approach: Strongly interacting matter AdS/CFT duality (Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 94, 111601) What can we learn from the data ?
22
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall21 Universal /s P.Kovtun, D.Son, A.S., hep-th/0309213, hep-th/0405231 Minimum of in units of
23
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall22 ( /s) min in units of T.Schafer, cond-mat/0701251 Chernai, Kapusta, McLerran, nucl-th/0604032 ~23 ~8.8 a trapped Fermi gas ~25 ~ 4.2 QCD
24
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall23 Viscosity from the data at RHIC Phys. Rev., 2003, C68, 034913 Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98, 092301 Temperature T=160 MeV Mean free path (transport sim.) f =0.3 0.03 fm Speed of sound c s =0.35 0.05
25
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall24 AdS/CFT and pQCD at LHC Double ratio of charm and bottom quark suppression promising window for AdS/CFT models. W.Horowitz Gyulassy arXiv:0706.2336
26
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall25 RHIC R cb Ratio Wider distribution of AdS/CFT curves due to large n: increased sensitivity to input parameters Advantage of RHIC: lower T => higher AdS speed limits pQCD AdS/CFT pQCD AdS/CFT WH, M. Gyulassy, to be published SQM07 W.Horowitz Gyulassy arXiv:0706.2336
27
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall26 Model Inputs AdS/CFT Drag: nontrivial mapping of QCD to SYM Mapping QCD N c to SYM is easy, but coupling is hard S runs whereas SYM does not: SYM is something of an unknown constant “Obvious”: s = SYM = const., T SYM = T QCD D/2 T = 3 inspired: s =.05 pQCD/Hydro inspired: s =.3 (D/2 T ~ 1) “Alternative”: = 5.5, T SYM = T QCD /3 1/4 Start loss at thermalization time 0 ; end loss at T c WHDG convolved radiative and elastic energy loss s =.3 WHDG radiative energy loss (similar to ASW) = 40, 100 Use realistic, diffuse medium with Bjorken expansion PHOBOS (dN g /dy = 1750); KLN model of CGC (dN g /dy = 2900) W.Horowitz Gyulassy arXiv:0706.2336
28
Oct-18-2007DongJo Kim, KPS 2007 Fall27 AdS/CFT Correspondence hep-th/0605158 Put FD/String too here
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.