1. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 1 “Data quality studies for burst analysis of Virgo data acquired during Weekly Science Runs “ E.Cuoco, EGO on behalf of Virgo Collaboration

2. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 2 WSR goals To ease the transition between commissioning to data taking 2.5 days during week-end, roughly one per month Provide data sets taken in stationary condition for : Commissioning studies Search analysis (online, offline and noise studies) WSR1 08/09-11/09 2006 : duty cycle 87.7% WSR2 22/09-25/09 2006 : duty cycle 71.2% WSR3 06/10-09/10 2006 (failed) WSR4 13/10-16/10 2006 (failed) WSR5 10/11-13/11 2006 : duty cycle 64.2% WSR6 01/12-04/12 2006 : duty cycle 80.5% best sensitivity reached (4 Mpc NS-NS horizon for an optimally oriented source, SNR=8)

3. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 3 Goal of this study Study the “quality” of the Virgo data Detect all kinds of glitches in the data which may spoil a burst search (loudest events study) Understand the origin of these glitches, when possible … Study the stationarity of the burst trigger rate Study possible vetoes strategy to suppress loud triggers Set up “tools” and provide information for the burst searches (DataQuality flags and vetoes)

4. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 4 DataQuality & Vetoes DQ flags: list of periods during which the ITF is badly functioning (photodiodes saturation, no calibration, noisy Second Stage Frequency Stabilization loop (SSFS), DAQ problem…). These periods can last from 1 second up to several hours. They are applied a priori or a posteriori on the triggers list produced by a burst pipeline. For the moment they concern only “obvious” problems but may concern in the future environmental condition (weather, …) if useful for the burst search Vetoes: list of short periods during which a fake burst signal could be visible in the Dark Fringe channel due to any cause except a genuine GW. They are applied on triggers’ lists.

5. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 5 Virgo burst pipelines Time domain Mean Filter (MF) Excess of Mean Estimation on different window size Time -Frequency Power Filter (PF) Wavelet Detection Filter (WDF) Correlator Peak Correlator (PC) Exponential Gaussian Correlator (EGC) Time-Frequency map with different window Wavelet Transform Coefficient threshold Energy estimation Wiener filtering with gaussian peak templates Wiener filtering with exponential gaussian templates Work on whitened data

6. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 6 Data Quality flags study Few problems identified so far: Dark fringe outport photodiodes saturation NE/WE/BS/PR mirror coil driver saturation Second Stage Frequency Stabilization (SSFS) correction saturation SSFS electronics problem Timing problems (DAQ) (WSR5) Photodiode shutter opening (WSR2) Data quality segments given by the h reconstruction processing White noise injection segments Bad quality when the lines are not high enough It has been checked that all these problems create loud events in the dark fringe Definition of Data Quality segments to flag these periods Most of these flags can be applied a posteriori on trigger lists

7. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 7 DQ segments application on MF triggers: WSR1 WSR1 photodiode saturation SSFS saturation

8. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 8 DQ segments application on MF triggers:WSR5 WSR5 timing SSFS saturation

9. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 9 DQ segments application on MF triggers:WSR6 Coil drivers saturation WSR6 The loudest events are suppressed by using these DQ flags

10. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 10 Loudest glitches study We found only a few categories in WSR data: Oscillations in control loops (longitudinal and angular dof): “z” events (low frequency events <100 Hz) Noise increase on the full bandwidth due to laser frequency noise coupling temporary increase (duration <few seconds): that generates some “Burst of Burst” events (“BOB” events) In C6/C7 data set, the origin of the laser frequency noise coupling increase has been identified to be due to the residual angular motions of the mirrors which were too loose SSFS electronics saturation events Study of environmental channels (seismometers, magnetometers, acoustic probes …) We did not find so far any loud glitches in the dark fringe due to environmental noise …

11. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 11 Events in the control signals

12. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 12 Example of a BOB event long duration events (up to few seconds), large frequency band content due to a coupling of the laser frequency noise and angular motion of the mirror

13. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 13 Example of a problem with the SSFS 2 seconds Exclude 1 second before and 1 second after the event in the SSFS channel Dark fringe

14. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 14 Veto for the SSFS saturation events WDF SNR of the triggers obtained on the channel which “monitors” the SSFS

15. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 15 SSFS channel as Veto SNR>85, Dt=0.1 More details in M.Delprete poster

16. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 16 Looking at the signal used to control the Power Recycling cavity length z-events Snr>30,Dt=0.1

17. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 17 WSR5:Dark fringe WDF events distribution

18. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 18 WSR5: Cleaning the Dark fringe For SSFS SNR >85 Dt=0.1 For z-events, SNR>30 Dt=0.1

19. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 19 Enviromental channels: Magnetometers in North End tower Glitches every 3-4secs

20. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 20 Glitches in WE-NE magnetometers

21. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 21 Lightning? Dark fringe

22. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 22 Coalescing binaries horizon and seismic noise Horizon fits quite well an empirical formula: 2.7 (4.3) Mpc – (wind+sea). “wind” is the North End tower top stage motion in the region 30-100 mHz, “sea” is the motion in the region 100 mHz-1 Hz WSR1 WSR6

23. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 23 Burst trigger rate and weather condition ? Study of the burst trigger rate as function of time (rate averaged on 10 minutes) Horizon seems to follow the low frequency (<1Hz) seismic activity seen by the top of the suspensions Comparison with the Common Mode Rejection Ratio which gives the coupling between the laser frequency noise and the dark fringe

24. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 24 Burst trigger rate and weather condition: WSR1 The trigger rate follows the seismic noise <1Hz The trigger rate follows the evolution of the CMRR

25. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 25 Burst trigger rate and weather condition: WSR5

26. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 26 Burst trigger rate and weather condition: WSR6 The trigger rate follows the seismic noise (<1Hz) The trigger rate does not follows the evolution of the CMRR

27. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 27 Conclusions WSR data sets have been analyzed offline using glitches finders algorithms to provide useful information for the burst searches Identification of all problems generating huge glitches  DataQuality flags defined to suppress a posteriori these periods Identification of the loudest remaining glitches. A few categories have been identified Setup of veto strategy for the identified sources of glitches We found correlation between the transient trigger rate and the weather condition

28. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 28 Spare slides

29. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 29 Horizon vs weather condition Seismic noise: quite quiet during the week-end!

30. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 30 A bob event Frequency (Hz) Dark fringe (whiten) Time (s)

31. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 31 BOB mechanism Proposed Mechanism at high frequency, frequency noise dominates Pr_B1_ACp =  *   related to Common Mode Rejection Ratio  varies with time by a significant amount (up to a factor 10)  variations are mainly driven by angles

32. GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 32 Dark fringe noise increase as function as the North End mirror θy angle NE_ty -2012 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1. 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 x 10 -8 Pr_B1_ACp RMS C7