Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNorah Wells Modified over 9 years ago
1
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Annette Pantall A, Ewins D. Muscle activity during stance phase of walking: Comparison of males with transfemoral amputation with osseointegrated fixations to nondisabled male volunteers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(4):499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204JSP Muscle activity during stance phase of walking: Comparison of males with transfemoral amputation with osseointegrated fixations to nondisabled male volunteers Annette Pantall, DO(UK), PhD; David Ewins, PhD
2
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Annette Pantall A, Ewins D. Muscle activity during stance phase of walking: Comparison of males with transfemoral amputation with osseointegrated fixations to nondisabled male volunteers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(4):499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204JSP Aim – Examine surface electromyography (sEMG) activity of hip joint muscles, vertical ground reaction force (GRF), and hip joint angles during stance phase of walking in individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) with osseointegrated fixations (OFs). Relevance – OFs may improve comfort, fatigue, hip movement, and ease of prosthetic attachment but little information is available regarding muscle function.
3
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Annette Pantall A, Ewins D. Muscle activity during stance phase of walking: Comparison of males with transfemoral amputation with osseointegrated fixations to nondisabled male volunteers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(4):499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204JSP Method 5 males with TFA with OFs. – Recorded GRF, lower- limb kinematics, and sEMG from residual-limb muscles. 10 nondisabled male subjects. – Collected sEMG data. Placement of electrodes on right lower limb.
4
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Annette Pantall A, Ewins D. Muscle activity during stance phase of walking: Comparison of males with transfemoral amputation with osseointegrated fixations to nondisabled male volunteers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(4):499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204JSP Results Hip muscles displayed cyclical patterns of sEMG activity suggestive of functional ability to contract and exert moment about hip joint. – Patterns of sEMG recordings were broadly similar between TFA and nondisabled groups. Main difference was phase of maxima and minima. Variability of muscle activity was greater in individuals with OFs than in subjects with intact limbs.
5
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Annette Pantall A, Ewins D. Muscle activity during stance phase of walking: Comparison of males with transfemoral amputation with osseointegrated fixations to nondisabled male volunteers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(4):499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0204JSP Conclusion Muscles in residual limb retain aspects of their previous functional pattern. Viability of myoprocessor in TFA. – Normalized amplitude is too variable to permit single muscles to be used. – Features like temporal occurrence of local minima or maxima that relate to loading and hip kinematics should be explored. – Microprocessor-controlled prostheses may modulate neurolocomotor signals, resulting in signal that could function as myoprocessor.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.