1. QAAP Workshop (Basic)

2. Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report

3. Commitment for the review process Time Effort Mission Activities * criteria * protocols Show courtesy Confidentiality Comments Judgment

4. * Establishing a sound evidence base *Agreeing Priorities * Keeping to schedule but also flexible Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement

5. Building on the evidence base * FAR * Initial commentaries * Identify gaps and requests * Observations and meetings * Formative judgments Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective…

6. Observing Questioning Listening The reviewer tools Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement

7. Relation to the facilitator Daily Academic staff Final oral feedback - Students - Stakeholders - Final meeting of review team Meeting attendance But, he will not attend Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement

8. Significance of meeting attendance Understandin g of line of enquiries Matters context of the institutions activities Clarificatio n on matters addressed in or omitted Relation to the facilitator Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement

9. Feedback on the initial commentaries * FAR & any supple. information * Record apparent (+) & (-) and further enquiry (?) * Identify of gaps, apparent inconsistencies and requests * Sharing of information & request * Activities during site visit * Formative judgment each day * Use the handbook

10. Formal judgements When ? Requirements ? Characteristics ? Pit falls ?

11. The Developmental Engagement Report Structure (annex Q) Essential qualities of the report Skills of effective reporting Production of the report

12. Essential Qualities of a report Report Should be Evaluative Judgment orrect lear oncise C All the team Fair Balanced Compliant Annex Q

13. The Structure of the Report reference Part 4 paragraphs 55-56 and annex Q Preface Executive Summary Main text comprising Introduction Evaluation Conclusions Conclude that the [institution] Either [is ready to receive an accreditation visit] Or [is not yet ready to receive an accreditation visit.] The strength include: Matters that should be addressed before an accreditation visit are:

14. The skills of effective reporting Notes Use Annexes I & Q Formative judgment Test & verify Evidenc e Discussion s Team

15. Cont. The skills of effective reporting Trivial details Drafts Comments & suggestions Over defensive Evaluative frame work

16. Production of the report Sharing formative judgments & draft paragraphs in the team Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q Decision-making in the team Making judgments + & -- Conclusion either / or Prepare oral feedback script (annex J)

17. Cont. Production of the report Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q Polishing written report Editing stage (ref. para. 56) Send draft 3 Institution Send draft 4 NQAAC Completion in 20w with milestones After the site visit

18. Completion in 20w with milestones o Week 1-2: Draft 1 (chair) from written contributions provided by peer reviewers during the site-visit & report-writing meeting o Week 3-4: (reviewers in the team) respond with written comments & suggestions based on record of DE o Week 4: Draft 2 (chair) Send to QAAP forward to independent editor suggestions will be made to chair

19. Completion in 20w with milestones o Week 6: Draft 3 sent to QAAP checked & sent to the institution with a covering letter inviting it to comment matters of factual accuracy Institution should respond within 2 weeks to QAAP o Week 8: Draft 3 returned by institution to QAAP o QAAP will seek views of review chair in considering any response

20. Completion in 20w with milestones o Week 12: Draft 4 QAAP may engage a professional editor to ensure its consistence with its policy o Week 20: Final draft 5 will be translated 0n A&E & QAAP will make it available to institution, reviewer chair & peer reviewers o Report is not published & remain confidential within the institution, its university, QAAP & Peer review team

21. How to conduct meetings? Situation Task Action Result

22. How to deal with the staff members? Self esteem ( ( احترام الذات Constructive Job related Arguments (( حجة، برهان،مناقشة Provide evidence Credible judgment

23. Success of the review process depends on Institution Facilitator Review team NQAAC

24. Characteristics of Review Process o All institutions are treated equally. o Respects the institution’s mission and chosen aims o Conforms with protocols outlined in handbook o Carried out by peers o Is collegial in nature and constructive o Is open and transparent o Good preparation by all parties is absolutely essential

25. o Testing the developing systems and processes o Dialogue with peers o Receiving external structured comments o Agenda for further improvement

26. o Work with the spirit of a team work. o Have a consensuses. o We are not inspectors. o We help the Faculty to have successful DE phase that will end in accreditation. o Respect the Faculty’s pride. o Do not suggest any solutions for the Faculty.

27. o Communicate through the e-mail properly. o Be sure about your conclusions and have an evidence for each. o Be sure that the report is correct, clear, fair, and balanced. o Editing. o Be ready to do the correction needed to release the second, third and final report.