Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHubert Andrews Modified over 9 years ago
1
Eve Gruntfest Geography and Environmental Studies University of Colorado Colorado Springs, CO 80933 ecg@brain.uccs.edu 719 262 4058 C O M E T Hydromet 00-1
2
The 1976 Big Thompson Flood What Have We Learned?
3
z 140 dead z new focus for next generation of policy makers and scientists involved in flood mitigation The Big Thompson Flood 1976
4
The Big Thompson Flood zWho lived? zWho died?
5
1986 z Signs z FLASH FLOODS are recognized as different from slow rise floods z Fewer people z Real time detection
6
1999 z More federal agencies flood warning z Increased vulnerability
7
1999 z ALERT user groups combine detection/response z Technology z National Weather Service overpromises z Dams/infrastructure z Real time data
8
RememberRemember zWarnings are not a stimulus response action People must be able to assess their own risk before they will take action
9
Fallacies of Warning Myths zPeople do not panic in response to warnings zPeople rarely get too much information z"Cry wolf" syndrome not applicable if previous misses are understood
10
zPublic wants information from multiple sources zPeople actively seek to confirm risk
11
zScientific Component zDetection zData Assessment zPrediction zInforming Warning Process Components
12
zHear zUnderstand zBelieve zPersonalize zDecide to Act zRespond Public Response Components
13
Warning Message Components zSpecific action zLocation zProtective behavior zTime frames zSource of warnings
14
Warning Messages should be zSpecific zConsistent zAccurate zClear yas to location yactions to take ytime before impact
15
Advantages and Disadvantages of Warning Systems – 17 Systems Unanticipated Problems
16
Sweating the small things zRedundancy zUnreliable mechanical parts z Weather/wildlife
17
Lack of maintenance funding zWho pays after warranty runs out? Access for gages - textbook vs. practical access
18
Local commitment Local vs. state vs. federal Charismatic individuals
19
Wide variation in levels of protection and expense z$500-$5,000,000 What is reasonable per capita expense? zAre warning systems cheap payoff of rain gods?
20
what type of training to operate? z Who runs show? Inconsistent level of expectation and formalization
21
Common Elements of Success zPolicy entrepreneur – someone who bases career on success of warning system zUse disaster as opportunity zHigh tech/with high touch Look outside of common frame for ideas and support
22
Social science principals that complicate warning process z What people say and what they do may not be the same thing z The link between awareness of a hazard and taking action is not known
23
zpeople continue doing what they are doing and deny threats – zpanic is not typical zpeople must understand, believe, personalize and then respond!
24
Paying Off the Raingods zWarning systems vs. detection systems zAppropriate per capita costs? zWays of evaluating success
25
Alternate uses of ALERT in Ventura County, California zDetermine burn index zCalculate evapotranspiration rate zHelp predict landslides zSatisfy EPA weather requirements for pesticide users zHang glider wind predictions
26
Research Priorities zCalculate warning system benefits zConduct coordinated post-audits zAddress the false alarm issue in specific leadtimes
27
If 28 people die in Texas was the warning a success?
28
zPackage response systems parallel to detection system packaging zCalculate appropriate actions within specific leadtimes zClarify where scientists disagree
29
How can we get people OUT of their cars?
30
zImplement a system for archiving and sharing data zDevelop warning system standards
31
Can we convince people they are better off wet than dead?
32
Who or what warning agency was most credible during the 1993 Midwestern U.S. floods?
36
How can we convince people they are better wet than dead?
37
The next time it rains 14 inches in four hours will we know in advance?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.