Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
3
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Misconduct Experiments Analysis Writing up Others
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Misconduct Experiments Analysis Writing up Others](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_3.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Misconduct Experiments Analysis Writing up Others")
4
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] deliberately making up all your data
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] deliberately making up all your data](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_4.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] deliberately making up all your data")
5
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] deleting some data to make trends clearer What about outliers?
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] deleting some data to make trends clearer What about outliers](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_5.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] deleting some data to make trends clearer What about outliers")
6
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] knowingly selecting only those data that support a hypothesis
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] knowingly selecting only those data that support a hypothesis](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_6.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] knowingly selecting only those data that support a hypothesis")
7
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] unwittingly selecting only those data that support a hypothesis
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] unwittingly selecting only those data that support a hypothesis](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_7.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] unwittingly selecting only those data that support a hypothesis")
8
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] not replicating experiments and observations
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] not replicating experiments and observations](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_8.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] not replicating experiments and observations")
9
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] not collecting data double blind
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] not collecting data double blind](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_9.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] not collecting data double blind")
10
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing not understanding the statistics you are using
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing not understanding the statistics you are using](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_10.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing not understanding the statistics you are using")
11
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing knowingly using statistics that will result in either Type I or II errors in favor of your preferred idea
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing knowingly using statistics that will result in either Type I or II errors in favor of your preferred idea](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_11.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing knowingly using statistics that will result in either Type I or II errors in favor of your preferred idea")
12
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing unwittingly using statistics that will result in either Type I or II errors in favor of your preferred idea
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing unwittingly using statistics that will result in either Type I or II errors in favor of your preferred idea](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_12.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing unwittingly using statistics that will result in either Type I or II errors in favor of your preferred idea")
13
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing not checking and verifying that the work of technicians and or coauthors
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing not checking and verifying that the work of technicians and or coauthors](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_13.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Analysing not checking and verifying that the work of technicians and or coauthors")
14
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting not mentioning data that indicate that any of the conclusions of a study may be in doubt
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting not mentioning data that indicate that any of the conclusions of a study may be in doubt](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_14.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting not mentioning data that indicate that any of the conclusions of a study may be in doubt")
15
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting showing only the results of your 'best' experiment or set of observations
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting showing only the results of your best experiment or set of observations](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_15.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting showing only the results of your best experiment or set of observations")
16
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting copying large portions of other peoples' published work without attribution
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting copying large portions of other peoples published work without attribution](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_16.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting copying large portions of other peoples published work without attribution")
17
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting copying small portions of other people's published or unpublished work without attribution
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting copying small portions of other people s published or unpublished work without attribution](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_17.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting copying small portions of other people s published or unpublished work without attribution")
18
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting paraphrasing other people's published or unpublished work without attribution
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting paraphrasing other people s published or unpublished work without attribution](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_18.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting paraphrasing other people s published or unpublished work without attribution")
19
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting knowingly neglecting to cite the work of others who have found similar (or very different) results
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting knowingly neglecting to cite the work of others who have found similar (or very different) results](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_19.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting knowingly neglecting to cite the work of others who have found similar (or very different) results")
20
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting unwittingly neglecting to cite the work of others who have found similar (or very different) results
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting unwittingly neglecting to cite the work of others who have found similar (or very different) results](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_20.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting unwittingly neglecting to cite the work of others who have found similar (or very different) results")
21
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting allowing your name to be put on papers to which you have made no reasonable contribution
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting allowing your name to be put on papers to which you have made no reasonable contribution](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_21.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting allowing your name to be put on papers to which you have made no reasonable contribution")
22
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting presenting seminars/talks/posters on rough analyses and incomplete data
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting presenting seminars/talks/posters on rough analyses and incomplete data](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_22.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] Writing Up and Presenting presenting seminars/talks/posters on rough analyses and incomplete data")
23
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics knowingly circumventing ethical guidelines, in a minor way, for animal or human research
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics knowingly circumventing ethical guidelines, in a minor way, for animal or human research](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_23.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics knowingly circumventing ethical guidelines, in a minor way, for animal or human research")
24
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics knowingly circumventing ethical guidelines, in a major way, for animal or human research
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics knowingly circumventing ethical guidelines, in a major way, for animal or human research](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_24.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics knowingly circumventing ethical guidelines, in a major way, for animal or human research")
25
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics unwittingly circumventing ethical guidelines for animal or human research
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics unwittingly circumventing ethical guidelines for animal or human research](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_25.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics unwittingly circumventing ethical guidelines for animal or human research")
26
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics using grant funds to attend a conference and then not, or barely, showing up
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics using grant funds to attend a conference and then not, or barely, showing up](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_26.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics using grant funds to attend a conference and then not, or barely, showing up")
27
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics applying for grants to do work that is already done
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics applying for grants to do work that is already done](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_27.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics applying for grants to do work that is already done")
28
Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics failing to reveal clear evidence of scientific misconduct in a fellow scientist
![Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics failing to reveal clear evidence of scientific misconduct in a fellow scientist](http://images.slideplayer.com./26/8612746/slides/slide_28.jpg "Levels of misconduct LEVEL 0: not really scientific misconduct, in my opinion LEVEL 1: mild misconduct [probably requires no public censure or disciplinary action] LEVEL 2: moderate misconduct [requires some retraction or correction in literature, and possibly disciplinary action] LEVEL 3: severe misconduct [requires both censure and punishment—should probably lose job/position, be fined, and possibly charged in court] General Ethics failing to reveal clear evidence of scientific misconduct in a fellow scientist")
Similar presentations
