1. G IBSON A ND W ALK (1960) The Visual Cliff

2. C ONTEXT Nativist view- innate ability to perceive the world. Opposed to learning through experience. Lashley and Russell (1934)- rats reared in dark could still jump correct distance to platform. Criticism: Invalid- rats could have learnt to judge distance through training.

3. A IM Investigate whether depth perception is innate or learned. Will mobile infants avoid a visual drop?

4. P ROCEDURE : S AMPLE 36 human infants aged 6-14 months and their mothers. Must be mobile- able to crawl. Followed by trials with animal young, e.g chicks, kids, lambs, rats, puppies and kittens. Another trial used only kids (goats) and lambs because they could be tested within 24 hrs of birth. No opportunity to learn to perceive depth.

5. P ROCEDURE : E QUIPMENT The Visual Cliff Surface usually in a check pattern (to show clear depth cues) and a drop covered by a glass floor. The glass floor controls for other non-visual cues.

7. P ROCEDURE - M ETHOD Child is placed in centre of visual cliff. Mother beckons child towards her from both sides (shallow and visual cliff) to test if the infant is less inclined to cross a visual cliff. Animal trials were used to reduce the chance of pre-crawl learning. Animals were placed in the centre and the direction in which they moved was tested (towards or away from the visual cliff) Kids and lambs were then placed on a surface, which could be lowered to create a visual cliff, to test their response to visual cues suggesting the floor was moving further away.

8. P ROCEDURE - M ETHOD CONT. In another condition the check surface was replaced by a uniformly grey one to ensure the validity of the measure. Was it the depth cues, which are eliminated by the grey surface, causing the participant’s reactions?

9. R ESULTS 27/32 infants moved off the centreboard. All 27 crawled onto the shallow surface. Only 3 ventured on to the visual cliff. Many infants moved away from their mother if she was beckoning them towards the visual cliff.

10. R ESULTS CONT. No lambs, kids or chicks ventured onto the visual cliff. When placed on the visual cliff they froze. In the adjustable cliff condition all animals froze when the visual cliff dropped more that 12 inches. They did not adapt after multiple trials. In the uniform grey condition animals showed no preference for either side of the surface.

11. C ONCLUSIONS All animals, including humans, had intact depth perception by the time they could move. In animals this occured within 24hrs of birth, suggesting depth perception is innate. Thus, the nativist position is supported. The grey condition showed the innate mechanism for depth perception involves interpreting changes in patterns.

12. E VALUATION - STRENGTHS The visual cliff is a safe and easily identifiable measure. Visual cliff procedure controlled for extraneous variables, such as touch perception. Improved validity. Tested on a range of species. Straightforward procedure. Easily replicable - good external reliability. Participants all had a very similar experience- good internal validity.

13. E VALUATION - WEAKNESSES Small sample. Large age range of infants. Infants have time to learn depth perception. Conclusions are justified by trials with other species. Behavioural measure- could not test infant’s or animal’s reasons for moving away from the visual cliff. Issue of validity. Ethics- causing distress to infants and animals. Cannot be asked for consent directly. Unable to withdraw.

14. P AST E XAM Q UESTIONS Section A 1. Summarise the aims and context of Gibson and Walk’s (1960) research ‘The Visual Cliff’. [12] 2011 2. Describe the findings and conclusions of Gibson & Walk’s (1960) research ‘The visual cliff’. [12] 2009 Section B 1. With reference to alternative evidence, critically assess Gibson & Walk’s (1960) research ‘The Visual Cliff’. [12] 2009