Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElmer Lambert Modified over 9 years ago
1
Someone Else’s NET IONET Big I MCC GO White Sands TDRSS Tracking #1 Tracking #2 Multicast Registration Routers Proxy Multicast Registration For Spacecraft Multicast Protocol Pares Extra Links
2
Someone Else’s NET IONET Big I MCC GO White Sands TDRSS Tracking #1 Tracking #2 On Launch Pad 1. Radios turned ON at Ground Operations and White Sands 2. RF connectivity established 3.MCC sends command using Multicast
3
Someone Else’s NET IONET Big I MCC GO White Sands TDRSS Tracking #1 Tracking #2 Launch to Orbit 1. Radios turned ON at Ground Operations and White Sands 2. RF connectivity established 3.MCC sends command using Multicast
4
Someone Else’s NET IONET Big I MCC GO White Sands TDRSS Tracking #1 Tracking #2 On Orbit 1. Radios turned ON at Ground Operations and White Sands 2. RF connectivity established 3.MCC sends command using Multicast
5
Someone Else’s NET IONET Big I MCC GO White Sands TDRSS Tracking #1 Tracking #2 Some Possibilities (These May or MAY NOT be good ideas.) Flight Computer Unicast Command IPsec Multicast Command Unicast Command
6
Conclusions base on Experience. Deployments and Observations When it is all said and done you WILL implement multiple mechanisms to get to the vehicle. Mobile-NETWORKING (nemo) is a protocol that may be useful – particularly for LEO. Limited strategic deployment of static routing is useful. Default routes are useful. Dynamic routing may be useful. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking (manet) may be useful. While on the pad or in testing at the factory is the most simplistic network of all and easy to solve as there is no real time-sensitive mobility. Launch and Reentry are the hardest to solve and communications is most critical at this point in the mission.
7
Launch / Reentry Requirements No loss of contact with the vehicle if at all possible For the must part, any practical route convergence time is associated with dynamic routing is unacceptable For the most part, any route time-outs as a result of mobile-ip or dynamic routing are unacceptable Bandwidth is at a minimum during launch and re-entry. Additional bandwidth is not available to allow routing protocols to run with reduced timers –- particularly since it still will probably not get me the convergence time I want. Use of static routes is problematic and should be avoided. –To easy to misconfigure –Difficult to trouble-shoot –Predictive static routing is really a new routing protocol.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.