Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Conducting a Board of Review South Florida Council Advancement Committee Standards South Florida Council, BSA Council Advancement Committee Chairman, Elliot.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Conducting a Board of Review South Florida Council Advancement Committee Standards South Florida Council, BSA Council Advancement Committee Chairman, Elliot."— Presentation transcript:

1 Conducting a Board of Review South Florida Council Advancement Committee Standards South Florida Council, BSA Council Advancement Committee Chairman, Elliot S. Grossman, Ph.D. May 7, 2007

2 Introduction The purpose of this presentation is to review how a Board of Review should be conducted. The purpose of this presentation is to review how a Board of Review should be conducted. To set a standard approach for all districts within the South Florida Council. To set a standard approach for all districts within the South Florida Council. The standard applies to Boards of Review held by units for lower ranks. The standard applies to Boards of Review held by units for lower ranks. And applies to Eagle Boards of Review held by Districts. And applies to Eagle Boards of Review held by Districts.

3 Purpose of a Board of Review The members of a Board of Review should have the following objectives in mind: To make sure the Scout has completed the requirements for the rank. To make sure the Scout has completed the requirements for the rank. To see how good an experience the Scout is having in the unit. To see how good an experience the Scout is having in the unit. To encourage the Scout to progress further. To encourage the Scout to progress further. The Board of Review is an opportunity to review of the Scout's attitudes, accomplishments and his acceptance of Scouting's ideals. The Board of Review is an opportunity to review of the Scout's attitudes, accomplishments and his acceptance of Scouting's ideals.

4 Purpose of a Board of Review The Board of Review (both unit and Eagle) must accept the scout’s requirements for advancement as a given. The Board of Review (both unit and Eagle) must accept the scout’s requirements for advancement as a given. They cannot reject a requirement that has been signed off by the unit leaders. They cannot reject a requirement that has been signed off by the unit leaders. They can only review the requirements to be sure all were completed. They can only review the requirements to be sure all were completed.

5 Purpose of a Board of Review The Board of Review provides "quality control" on advancement within the unit. The Board of Review provides "quality control" on advancement within the unit. It provides an opportunity for the Scout to develop and practice those skills needed in an interview situation. It provides an opportunity for the Scout to develop and practice those skills needed in an interview situation. It is an opportunity for the Scout to review his accomplishments. It is an opportunity for the Scout to review his accomplishments.

6 The Board of Review is NOT The Board of Review is NOT a retest. The Board of Review is NOT a retest. Scout has already been tested on the skills and activities required for the rank. Scout has already been tested on the skills and activities required for the rank.

7 The Chairman of the Board of Review Should ensure that all the requirements have been "signed off" in the Scout's handbook. Should ensure that all the requirements have been "signed off" in the Scout's handbook. Should ensure that leadership and merit badge records are consistent with the requirements for the rank. Should ensure that leadership and merit badge records are consistent with the requirements for the rank.

8 Scheduling a Unit Board of Review The Board of Review for all ranks except an Eagle Board of Review is conducted within the troop. The Board of Review for all ranks except an Eagle Board of Review is conducted within the troop. These Boards of Review should be scheduled to keep the time a scout completes the requirements for his next rank and the Board of Review to a minimum. These Boards of Review should be scheduled to keep the time a scout completes the requirements for his next rank and the Board of Review to a minimum.

9 Scheduling a Unit Board of Review The scout’s accomplishment should be recognized by the troop as soon as possible after the Board of Review is successfully completed. The scout’s accomplishment should be recognized by the troop as soon as possible after the Board of Review is successfully completed. A troop’s Court of Honor still can recognize the scout’s accomplishment at a later date. A troop’s Court of Honor still can recognize the scout’s accomplishment at a later date.

10 Scheduling an Eagle Board of Review The Eagle Board of Review is scheduled by the district’s Advancement Committee. The Eagle Board of Review is scheduled by the district’s Advancement Committee. The district Advancement Chairs should: The district Advancement Chairs should: Communicate the steps the troops should take to arrange for their scouts to be included in upcoming Eagle Boards of Review. Communicate the steps the troops should take to arrange for their scouts to be included in upcoming Eagle Boards of Review. Communicate the regular schedule of the Boards. Communicate the regular schedule of the Boards. Be flexible and be ready when circumstances indicate to schedule extra Eagle Boards of Review. Be flexible and be ready when circumstances indicate to schedule extra Eagle Boards of Review.

11 Composition of a Unit Board of Review Three to six members of the Troop Committee. Three to six members of the Troop Committee. Troop Advancement Chairperson typically acts as the chairperson of the Board of Review. Troop Advancement Chairperson typically acts as the chairperson of the Board of Review. Relatives or guardians may not serve as members of a Scout's Board of Review. Relatives or guardians may not serve as members of a Scout's Board of Review.

12 Composition of an Eagle Board of Review Three to six members drawn from Scouting and the community. Three to six members drawn from Scouting and the community. The members are selected by the District Advancement Committee. The members are selected by the District Advancement Committee. At least one member of the District Advancement Committee must be a member and serves as chairperson of the Board of Review. At least one member of the District Advancement Committee must be a member and serves as chairperson of the Board of Review.

13 Composition of an Eagle Board of Review Members of the community who are not registered Scouters may be included. Members of the community who are not registered Scouters may be included. For example, a representative from a chartering organization, an adult Eagle Scout, a religious leader, a judge or local politician may serve. For example, a representative from a chartering organization, an adult Eagle Scout, a religious leader, a judge or local politician may serve. Unit leaders from the Scout's unit, relatives, or guardians may not serve as members of a Scout's Board of Review for Eagle. Unit leaders from the Scout's unit, relatives, or guardians may not serve as members of a Scout's Board of Review for Eagle.

14 Mechanics of a Unit Board of Review The Scout is introduced to the board by the Chairperson of the board. The Scout is introduced to the board by the Chairperson of the board. The Scout should be in full uniform. The Scout should be in full uniform. The chairman of the Board of Review should ask the Scout to come to attention, and lead the Board with the Pledge of Allegiance. The chairman of the Board of Review should ask the Scout to come to attention, and lead the Board with the Pledge of Allegiance. The Scout should recite one or more of the following (depending on the rank): The Scout should recite one or more of the following (depending on the rank): The Scout Law The Scout Law The Scout Oath The Scout Oath The Scout Motto The Scout Motto The Scout Slogan The Scout Slogan The Outdoor Code The Outdoor Code

15 Mechanics of a Unit Board of Review The board members are invited to ask questions of the Scout appropriate to the rank. The board members are invited to ask questions of the Scout appropriate to the rank. The questions should be open-ended, offering an opportunity for the Scout to speak about his opinions, experiences, activities, and accomplishments. The questions should be open-ended, offering an opportunity for the Scout to speak about his opinions, experiences, activities, and accomplishments. Avoid questions which only require a simple one or two word answer. Avoid questions which only require a simple one or two word answer. The time for a Board of Review should be from 15 to 30 minutes, with the shorter time for the lower ranks. The time for a Board of Review should be from 15 to 30 minutes, with the shorter time for the lower ranks.

16 Mechanics of an Eagle Board of Review The mechanics of a Board of Review for Eagle are similar to all other Boards of Review, except it is more in depth, and lasts 30 minutes to an hour. The mechanics of a Board of Review for Eagle are similar to all other Boards of Review, except it is more in depth, and lasts 30 minutes to an hour. The Eagle Scout Rank Application and Eagle Project Notebook must be present and reviewed by the board. The Eagle Scout Rank Application and Eagle Project Notebook must be present and reviewed by the board.

17 Mechanics of an Eagle Board of Review The Scoutmaster of the candidate presents the Scout to the board members. The Scoutmaster of the candidate presents the Scout to the board members. The Scoutmaster then leaves the room. The Scoutmaster then leaves the room. Parents or guardians of the Scout may not be present during the Board of Review. Parents or guardians of the Scout may not be present during the Board of Review.

18 The Nature of the Questions The questions for the lower ranks are simpler and generally deal with factual information about the Scout's participation in his unit, and his approach to applying the skills he has learned toward earning the next rank. The questions for the lower ranks are simpler and generally deal with factual information about the Scout's participation in his unit, and his approach to applying the skills he has learned toward earning the next rank. The questions for the higher ranks are less factual, and generally seek to aid understanding of how Scouting is becoming an integral part of the Scout's life. The questions for the higher ranks are less factual, and generally seek to aid understanding of how Scouting is becoming an integral part of the Scout's life.

19 The Nature of the Questions Remember: it is not the point of a Board of Review to retest the Scout. Remember: it is not the point of a Board of Review to retest the Scout. Questions like, "Where did you learn about..." or "Why do you think it is important for a [rank] Scout to have this skill?" are valid. Questions like, "Where did you learn about..." or "Why do you think it is important for a [rank] Scout to have this skill?" are valid.

20 See the white paper “Conducting a Board of Review” by the South Florida Council Advancement Committee for Appropriate Board of Review Questions by Rank www.sfcbsa.org


Download ppt "Conducting a Board of Review South Florida Council Advancement Committee Standards South Florida Council, BSA Council Advancement Committee Chairman, Elliot."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google