Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Milt E. Nappier March 25, 2009 Combatant Commander Exercise Engagement Stakeholder Leadership Team (CE2 SLT) FY 2009 CE2T2 Fiscal Update 2009 Midyear Review.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Milt E. Nappier March 25, 2009 Combatant Commander Exercise Engagement Stakeholder Leadership Team (CE2 SLT) FY 2009 CE2T2 Fiscal Update 2009 Midyear Review."— Presentation transcript:

1 Milt E. Nappier March 25, 2009 Combatant Commander Exercise Engagement Stakeholder Leadership Team (CE2 SLT) FY 2009 CE2T2 Fiscal Update 2009 Midyear Review Planning

2 2 FY 2009 CE2T2 Funding $747M CE2T2 funds available for obligation (less taxes)  O&M -- $670M – 65% of funding issued to date  RDT&E -- $57M (includes $20M for Congressional Adds) -- 100% of funding issued  Procurement -- $20M – 100% of funding issued Congressional and Undistributed Taxes -- $21.7M  O&M Undistributed Taxes -- $19.7M  RDT&E Undistributed Taxes -- $1.8M  Procurement Undistributed Taxes -- $.2M OUSD(P&R) Readiness and Training released Midyear Review Planning Guidance March 4, 2009

3 3 1st Quarter $221,059 33% 2nd Quarter $212,181 32% 3rd Quarter $168,533 25% 4th Quarter $68,231 10% $ 000 1st Quarter Obligations $76,225 11% 2nd Quarter Obligations thru February $259,120 39%  FY09 Apportionment Request reflects how PMs planned to execute O&M CE2T2 programs  OSD(C) required justification to support more than 25% of funding per quarter  Shows how PMs are executing O&M CE2T2 programs as reflected in the Execution Management System (EMS) compared to FY09 Apportionment Request  CE2T2 Program on track to achieve at least 65% obligations by end of 2 nd Quarter (31 March) $ 000 CE2T2 FY 2009 O&M FISCAL OVERVIEW September 2008 February 2009

4 4 February O&M 2009 Actuals Obligations — Goal 42% Programs below RED line did not meet February 2009 42% Obligation benchmark for O&M

5 5 February Procurement 2009 Actuals Obligations — Goal 33% Programs below RED line did not meet February 2009 Obligation benchmarks (Proc 33%; RDTE 46%) February RDT&E 2009 Actuals Obligations — Goal 46%

6 6 FY2009 Summary of Program Performance February 2009

7 7 FY2009 Financial Status – O&M Actuals versus Annual Allocations Program Obligation Summary Public Law 31 July: 80% Mid-Year Review (notional): 50% February 2009 Goal: 42%

8 8 FY2009 Financial Status – Procurement Actuals versus Annual Allocations Program Obligation Summary End of Year Goal: 77% Mid-Year Review (notional): 40% February 2009 Goal: 33%

9 9 FY2009 Financial Status – RDT&E Actuals versus Annual Allocations Program Obligation Summary End of Year Goal: 90% Mid-Year Review (notional): 55% February 2009 Goal: 46%

10 10 FY2008 Summary of Program Performance February 2009

11 11 FY2008 Financial Status – Procurement Actuals versus Annual Allocations Program Obligation Summary

12 12 FY2008 Financial Status – RDT&E Actuals versus Annual Allocations Program Obligation Summary

13 13 2009 Midyear Review Planning -- Formats (Tentative)

14 14 2009 Midyear Review (MYR) Scope FY 2008: CE2T2 RDT&E and Procurement Programs FY 2009: CE2T2 O&M, RDT&E and Procurement Programs Notional Midyear Review Benchmarks (Obligation %) Expenditures OUSD(Comptroller) 2008 Midyear Review Guidance quote: “As with any RDT&E account, the main focus when measuring execution performance is expenditures.” — 2008 Midyear Review RDT&E expenditure benchmark was 35% No 2008 MYR guidance on expenditures for O&M or Procurement OFFICIAL MYR GUIDANCE TBD FY 2008: CE2T2 RDT&E and Procurement Programs FY 2009: CE2T2 O&M, RDT&E and Procurement Programs Notional Midyear Review Benchmarks (Obligation %) Expenditures OUSD(Comptroller) 2008 Midyear Review Guidance quote: “As with any RDT&E account, the main focus when measuring execution performance is expenditures.” — 2008 Midyear Review RDT&E expenditure benchmark was 35% No 2008 MYR guidance on expenditures for O&M or Procurement OUSD(Comptroller) MYR GUIDANCE TBD

15 15 EMS Documentation Use file upload feature in EMS to provide documentation to support obligations, etc.

16 16 Official format will change – information requested relatively the same Expect several iterations of these charts Significant difference this year – OUSD(P&R) will develop MYR charts based on information in the Execution Management System (EMS) — Documentation must be loaded in EMS to support obligations — OUSD(P&R) will forward draft charts to PMs for coordination

17 17 Unfunded Requirements (UFRs) Resource Management Plan Internal Reprioritization Midyear Review UFRs are requested for CE2T2 Enterprise wide sourcing  Commands/organizations can reallocate up to $500K O&M internally – Appropriation and service boundaries must be adhered to – These reallocations must be reported during periodic JIPT meetings  Command/organizations can reallocate up to $1.5M O&M internally – Appropriation and service boundaries must be adhered to – These reallocations require Director, Readiness and Training Policy and Programs (RTPP) approval  Reallocations greater than $1.5M in O&M require Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Readiness (DUSD(R)) approval RDT&E and Procurement Reallocation  Must follow JIPT and SAG approval thresholds as O&M appropriation  Can only be made in accordance with applicable fiscal law and procedural guidelines Prioritized Unfunded Requirements Due 3 Apr 09

18 18 Unfunded Requirements (UFRs) Rules of Engagement UFRs must be approved at GO/FO/SES level and submitted to Mr. Gardner with a copy to Mr. DiGiovanni and Milt Nappier UFRs must be prioritized by command/organization OUSD(P&R), in coordination with the Joint Staff, JFCOM and Services (GO/FO/SES level) will prioritize UFRs across CE2T2 Enterprise O&M UFRs – Submission Limits  COCOM HQ Joint Exercise Support via Joint Staff – 5 maximum  Joint Staff – 3 maximum  JFCOM – 5 maximum  Services – 2 per Service RDT&E and Procurement  Three UFRs per appropriation In addition to merits of each UFR, following will also be considered  March 31 st (midyear review) benchmarks  Funds unobligated at end of FY2008 Prioritized Unfunded Requirements Due 3 Apr 09

19 19 5 MarchFinalize Obligations & Expenditure Plans in EMS 5 MarchEMS Update (February Actuals) 5 MarchLoad/Update Obligation and Expenditure Documentation in EMS 3 AprilUnfunded Requirements Due 5 AprilEMS Update (March Actuals) 31 Jul 09 80% O&M Must Be Obligated Action Items

20 20 BACKUP

21 21 DoD Obligation and Expenditure Goals FY 2009 REQUIRES OUSD(COMPTROLLER) CONCURRENCE


Download ppt "Milt E. Nappier March 25, 2009 Combatant Commander Exercise Engagement Stakeholder Leadership Team (CE2 SLT) FY 2009 CE2T2 Fiscal Update 2009 Midyear Review."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google