1. Precision tests of the flavor sector of the standard model Jacques Chauveau LPNHE 15 Dec 2010

2. Witek’s roadmap To cover – the physics of the CKM, – the rare decays of B-mesons and kaons – and, if the time allow, a mentioning of the lepton sectors (e.g the last results from PSI). To convey a message – that the flavour sector tests already put a very stringent limits on the possible extension of the SM. – together with the talk on the LEP EW-legacy, better identify the precision challenges for the LHC EW programme the domains where the LHC can be competitive with respect to the previous results. 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC2

3. References 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC3 The data are averaged in – PDG K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010) – HFAG D. Asner et al., "Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton Properties," arXiv:1010.1589 updates at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag D. Asner et al., "Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton Properties," arXiv:1010.1589 Ecole de Gif 2010 (Koppenburg, Monteil) Excellent reviews (there are more): A. Hoeker, Z. Ligeti Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci.56:501-567,2006 CKM workshop 2008 book Physics Reports 494 (2010), pp. 197-414 G.Isidori, Y. Nir, G. Perez (INP) arXiv:1002.0900v2 [hep-ph] arXiv:1002.0900v2 The global CKM fits CKMfitter (which I use extensively ) CKMfitter Group (J. Charles et al.), Eur. Phys. J. C41, 1-131 (2005) [hep-ph/0406184], updates at http://ckmfitter.in2p3.frCKMfitter Group (J. Charles et al.), Eur. Phys. J. C41, 1-131 (2005) updates at http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr UTfit http://utfit.org/UTfit/

4. Outline Flavor physics CKM fits Tensions Potentially predictive areas Perspectives 15/12/20104J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

5. Flavor Physics 15/12/20105J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

6. Flavor physics Flavor (in the SM) – The fermions (Q, U, D, L, E) – have mass – mix Flavor physics: interactions that distinguish flavors – Weak and Yukawa Flavor change, flavor violation – Only the weak CC at tree level in the SM FCNC – Only in loop processes in the SM 15/12/20106J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC Pattern ??

7. The CKM mechanism The Yukawa interaction is the unique source of flavor physics 10 parameters in the quark sector. Ad Hoc. In the absence of Yukawa couplings: Flavor symmetry The Yukawa terms break the Flavor Symmetry bringing quark mixing: The CKM mechanism, with the unitary matrix V. 15/12/20107J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC B factory legacy “Very likely, Flavor Violation and CP violation in flavor changing processes are dominated by the CKM mechanism” (Nir et al.) didi ujuj WW Vij

8. The CKM matrix Falsifiable at low energy: – 4 parameters measurable in many processes – 3 mixing angles and one phase: CP violation – Interference patterns, therefore enhanced sensitivity. 15/12/20108J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC Observed hierarchy inspired the Wolfenstein parameterization

9. Unitarity triangles The kaon triangle The Bs triangle The D triangle Jarlskog invariant The UT 15/12/20109J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

10. 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC10       CKM: the matrix and the UT Phase convention independent parameters

11. 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC11 CKM matrix and UT Falsifiable at low energy: 4 parameters measurable in many processes, 2 realizing that is precisely known and A factorizes My focus

12. The strategy Initial strategy when planning the B factories – Test the validity of the Standard Model – If there is a discrepancy, look for new physics Current version – The SM (CKM) is valid: Precision tests – Look for NP within the uncertainties – The CKM fits reveal a few tensions – New measurements (not precise yet) on the Bs There is a new physics flavor problem 15/12/201012J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

13. Precision flavor tests 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC13

14. Theory to interpret flavor measurements K, (D), B d and B s – Lightest quarks in a generation undergo rare (decay, mixing) processes. At low energy, integrate out W, Z, t, resulting in 3 (4) or 5 active flavor effective Hamiltonians written as an Operator Product Expansion (OPE) – DeltaF=2 – DeltaF=1 – Their interference 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC14 Wilson coefficients Calculated perturbatively Non perturbative QCD, the hard part

15.  F=1 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC15 There are golden modes, and non-golden modes.

16.  F=1 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC16 For , lepton pairs final states, radiative penguin processes, remove the quarks EWP, add new (CA) EWP with on shell , Z Trouble is at low energy, to compute the matrix elements of the effective operators. Use factorization theorems (QCDF, PQCD, SCET) and Lattice QCD. EWP (radiative)

17.  F=2, K and B mixing 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC17 Lattice, cancellation Long distance effects break the OPE. Hence not applicable to  m K Easier formalism, only one type of operator, collapsing box diagrams. Bag factor

18. Input to the CKM fits Only take observables with theoretical uncertainty under control. Experimental direct determinations of the CKM matrix elements (sides). CP violation and mixing observables (angles) Theoretical parameters – determined from experiment – or from theory (LQCD or other) 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC18

19. Mixing, A CP (t) in the CKM fit 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC19

20.  Br    For , fight the hadronic uncertainties by using isospin. Works very well in the  system skip – For , combine GLW, ADS, GGSZ methods in B u  D(*)K(*) – Vub, Vcb from the Bd semileptonic inclusive and exclusive decays Br    interesting, points to higher Vub, but see below 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC20

21. 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC21

22. CKM status Global fit results described by Frank Porter at ICHEP 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC22 Much less precise than the EWPT

23. Global fit results 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC23 S. t’Jampens at ICHEP10

24. Fit variations 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC24 tree loop CP cons CP viol w/o  w/o s2  global

25. Tensions Some measurements are difficult – V ub and V cb in semileptonic B decays – sin2  eff Variations of the fit reveal some inconsistencies – BR(B   ), sin2  cc, [  K ] The new Bs measurements –  S, semimuonic asymmetry A sl s 15/12/201025J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

26. V ub and  K 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC26

27. sin2  eff 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC27

28. sin2  and BR(B   ) 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC28 St. t’J @ ICHEP10

29. sin2  and BR(B   ) Correlation BR(  ) and  md 15/12/201029J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC Also sensitive to charged Higgs

30. Recent TeVatron measurements 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC30 (B factories) 3.2 

31. HFAG accounting of TeVatron 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC31 plotinclude

32. Potentially predictive areas The SM test passed with flying colors (2  consistency) Learn from the past looking glass? – charm existence (GIM) and mass (K mixing) – 3 rd Generation (KM) – Top mass (Bd mixing) New physics in loops  fit CKM parameters with trees, compare to loops. EDM constraints The flavor structure of 1 TeV scale New physics is non generic – The MFV scenario – Other approaches Phenomenological attempts – Generic effective theory (Fermi) – Specific models 15/12/201032J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

33. CKM fitter generic searches 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC33 arXiv:1008.1593v2arXiv:1008.1593v2 [hep-ph]

34. Phenomenological strategies The SM as a low energy effective theory – what are the new energy scales? – what are the new interactions and symmetries? EWP arguments favor  ~1 TeV (Andreas’ talk) Two main strategies (see e.g CKM08) 1.Model independent a la Fermi DF=2 strongly constrained unless selection rules (symmetry) imposed MFV is an example 2. Explicit high energy models SUSY e.g. Mass insertion approximation in general MSSM Or non SUSY 15/12/201034J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

35. Model independent approach For instance assume no NP affecting the CKM fit in processes with SM tree. Generic  F=2 NP is ruled out flavor problem weak constraint on  s MFV (minimal flavor violation) – A symmetry (the non Yukawa SM flavor symmetry) – Symmetry breaking only by the SM Yu and Yd – Generated scale above but not far from 1 TeV – Some predictions, not spectacular 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC35

36. Explicit high energy models 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC36

37. A new generation of experiments LHCb Super Flavor factories Rare kaon decay experiments 15/12/201037J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

38. INP compilation 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC38 INP compilation arXiv:1002.0900v2arXiv:1002.0900v2 [hep-ph] ***

39. INP compilation 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC39

40. Outlook SM test passed (2  consistency). The precision is much less than for the EWPT Next generation of experiments can improve. Also in the lepton sector (PSI experiments): G F, LFV. Lattice must match the experimental projected precision. There is room for a fourth family of fermions. ~2-3  discrepancies in the CKM fits to be watched. How much can we hope to learn about the NP flavor problem from low energy measurements? If new particles seen at the LHC, flavor measurements to tell the couplings. Still no clue to “who ordered that?”, the BAU. 15/12/201040J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

41. BACKUP 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC41

42. 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC42

43. 11/16/07 OSUJ.Chauveau CPV in B and CKM43 Amplitude structure in the SM T P EWP A ccs ~ V cb V cs * T ccs + V ub V us * P s A sss ~ V cb V cs * P + V ub V us * P A ccd ~ V tb V td * P + V cb V cd * T ccd A uud ~ V tb V td * P + V ub V ud * T uud (T cus + T ucs ) common D decay modes 2 4 3 GOLDEN Charmonium K S,L   K S  D + D -   +  -  eff Cabibbo and color suppression DK  eff

44. Model independent  F=2 detailed bounds 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC44

45. MFV bounds 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC45

46. Rare B decays 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC46

47. SuperB 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC47

48. Rare B decays 15/12/2010J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC48

49. Rare kaon decays K   15/12/201049J. Chauveau Workshop precision at LHC

50. Measurement of Br(K L    ) The clean process : 1 ～ 2 % theoretical uncertainty Sensitive to New Physics. Amplitude of CP-violation in Quark Sector. V td H. Watanabe at ICHEP10

51. F. Mescia and C. Smith updated in June, 2010.

52. MEG (2) Sawada Iwamoto Spiro

53. MEG (3) Sawada

54. CKM (2) T’Jampens Porter Spiro