Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMilo Mason Modified over 9 years ago
1
Small Area (e.g. County-level) Estimates
2
Concepts Considerable interest in small area estimates of uninsured (e.g. County level) Two estimation methods for an area: –Direct: measure rate from a sample of population of interest –Indirect: measure rate from a “superpopulation” and apply to smaller areas Direct is preferred, but expensive – necessary to have suitable number of respondents in each area (e.g., 100 counties).
3
Concepts Direct estimates, using CPS precision standards, would require surveying approximately 400,000 North Carolinians (4000 per county). Indirect approach: –Model probability of uninsured for state residents –Apply probability to county residents
4
Four out of six shapes (with known colors) are blue 4/6 = 83% Direct Estimation Indirect Estimation ? ?? ? ? We know that in similar rectangles, 75% of circles and 50% of triangles are blue. ? ? 2.25 circles and 2 triangles are blue: (2.25 + 2 ) / 7 = 61% Comparison of Direct and Indirect ? ? ? ? ? ?
5
Methods 1. Use Current Population Survey data on North Carolina residents to estimate the probability of being uninsured in 2002. Allow the following to affect the probability of being uninsured: Age, gender, race/ethnicity, employment status, industry, income, education. 2. Apply observed probabilities to demographics of each county.
6
Methods Comparability with other estimates –In most results presented here, we combine last three years putting more weight on recent surveys. “One year” estimates less precise “Multiyear” estimates less responsive to trends –Eliminate all respondents age 65 or over. BRFSS, published by State Center for Health Statistics, has direct estimates on some counties. Different question wording precludes direct comparison. We are working on combining the two approaches to get better estimates. –Direct estimation, of course, still entails surveying a sample
7
Results Complete report –Available at www.shepscenter.unc.edu Highlights: –Percentage 0-64 year olds without insurance varies from 15.9% (Wake) to 26.1% (Duplin) –Number of uninsured residents varies from 850 (Tyrrell) to 115,000 (Mecklenburg)
9
CPS (indirect) BRFSS (direct)
10
Summary Approximately 18-19 percent of North Carolinians between the ages of 0 and 64 had no health insurance for the entirety of 2003. –Evidence of an increase over the past four years Considering the risk of being uninsured for a given characteristic may yield different policy conclusions than considering the characteristics of the uninsured –For example, unemployed are more likely to be uninsured, but relatively few uninsured are unemployed. Increases in statewide uninsured rate due somewhat to changes in demographic structure, but more due to changes in UI rates within demographic Statewide, evidence of higher uninsured rates in Eastern and Mountain Counties
11
For More Information Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC –http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu –Click for county-level estimates –2003 estimates not posted yet, but soon Kaiser Family Foundation –Analysis of national trends –http://www.kff.org U.S. Census Bureau –Results of national surveys –http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthins.html Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System –North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics –http://www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/brfss/
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.