Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Remote Sensing of Snow Cover

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Remote Sensing of Snow Cover"— Presentation transcript:

1 Remote Sensing of Snow Cover
with slides from Jeff Dozier, Tom Painter

2 Topics in Remote Sensing of Snow
Optics of Snow and Ice Remote Sensing Principles Applications Operational Remote Sensing

3 FUNDAMENTALS OF REMOTE SENSING
Energy source Atmospheric interactions Target interactions Sensor records energy Transmission to receiving station Interpretation Application

4 The EM Spectrum Gamma Rays X rays Ultra-violet(UV)
Visible ( nm) Near Infrared (NIR) Infrared (IR) Microwaves Weather radar Television, FM radio Short wave radio The EM Spectrum 10-1nm 1 nm mm mm 1 mm mm mm 1 mm cm cm 1 m m Violet Blue Green Yellow Orange Red

5 C = l v, where c is speed of light, l is wavelength (m),
And v is frequency (cycles per second, Hz)

6 WAVELENGTHS WE CAN USE MOST EFFECTIVELY

7 Atmospheric absorption and scattering
emission absorption scattering

8 RADIATION CHOICES Absorbed Reflected Transmitted

9 Properties of atmosphere and surface
Conservation of energy: radiation at a given wavelength is either: reflected — property of surface or medium is called reflectance or albedo (0-1) absorbed — property is absorptance or emissivity (0-1) transmitted — property is transmittance (0-1) reflectance + absorptance + transmittance = 1 (for a surface, transmittance = 0)

10 PIXELS: Minimum sampling area
One temperature brightness (Tb) value recorded per pixel

11 EM Wavelengths for Snow
Snow on the ground Visible, near infrared, infrared Microwave Falling snow Long microwave, i.e., weather radar K (l = 1cm) X (l = 3 cm) C (l = 5 cm) S (l = 10 cm)

12 Different Impacts in Different Regions of the Spectrum
Visible, near-infrared, and infrared Independent scattering Weak polarization Scalar radiative transfer Penetration near surface only ~½ m in blue, few mm in NIR and IR Small dielectric contrast between ice and water Microwave and millimeter wavelength Extinction per unit volume Polarized signal Vector radiative transfer Large penetration in dry snow, many m Effects of microstructure and stratigraphy Small penetration in wet snow Large dielectric contrast between ice and water

13 Visible, Near IR, IR

14 Solar Radiation Instrument records temperature brightness at certain wavelengths

15 Snow Spectral Reflectance
20 40 60 80 100 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 reflectance (%) 0.05 mm 0.2 mm 0.5 mm 1.0 mm wavelength (mm)

16 General reflectance curves
from Klein, Hall and Riggs, 1998: Hydrological Processes, 12, with sources from Clark et al. (1993); Salisbury and D'Aria (1992, 1994); Salisbury et al. (1994)

17 Refractive Index of Light (m)
m = n + ik The “real” part is n Spectral variation of n is small Little variation of n between ice and liquid

18 Attenuation Coefficient
Attenuation coefficient is the imaginary part of the index of refraction A measure of how likely a photon is to be absorbed Little difference between ice and liquid Varies over 7 orders of magnitude from 0.4 to 2.5 uM

19 ADVANCED VERY HIGH RESOLUTION RADIOMETER (AVHRR)
2,400 km swath Orbits earth 14 times per day, 833 km height 1 kilometer pixel size Spectral range Band 1: uM Band 2: uM Band 3: uM Band 4: uM

20 Snow Measurement Satellite Hydrology Program
AVHRR and GOES Imaging Channels

21 Snow Measurement Remote Sensing of Snow Cover (NOAA 16)

22 Snow Measurement NOAA Micron Channel

23 Mapping of snow extent Subpixel problem Cloud cover
“Snow mapping” should estimate fraction of pixel covered Cloud cover Visible/near-infrared sensors cannot see through clouds Active microwave can, at resolution consistent with topography

24 Analysis of Mixed Pixels
Assuming linear mixing, the spectrum of a pixel is the area-weighted average of the spectra of the “end-members” For all wavelengths l, Solve for fn

25 Subpixel Resolution Snow Mapping from AVHRR
May 26, 1995 (AVHRR has 1.1 km spatial resolution, 5 spectral bands)

26 AVHRR Fractional SCA Algorithm
Scene Evaluation: Degree of Cloud Cover over Study Basins Execute Sub-pixel snow cover algorithm using reflectance Bands 1,2,3 Snow Map Algorithm Output: Mixed clouds, high reflective bare ground, and Sub-pixel snow cover Execute Atmospheric Corrections, Conversion to engineering units AVHRR (HRPT FORMAT) Pre-Processed at UCSB [NOAA-12,14,16] AVHRR Bands 1 2 3 4 5 Thermal Mask Build Thermal Mask Build Cloud Masks using several spectral-based tests Geographic Mask Application of Cloud, Thermal, and Geographic masks to raw AVTREE output Composite Cloud Mask Masked Fractional SCA Map

27 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM)
30 m spatial resolution 185 km FOV Spectral resolution μm μm μm μm μm μm μm 16 day repeat pass

28 Subpixel Resolution Snow Mapping from Landsat Thematic Mapper
Sept 2, 1993 (snow in cirques only) Feb 9, 1994 (after big winter storm) Apr 14, 1994 (snow line m) (Rosenthal & Dozier, Water Resour. Res., 1996)

29 Discrimination between Snow and Glacier Ice, Ötztal Alps
Landsat TM, Aug 24, 1989 snow ice rock/veg

30 AVIRIS CONCEPT 224 different detectors 380-2500 nm range
10 nm wavelength 20-meter pixel size Flight line 11-km wide Flies on ER-2 Forerunner of MODIS

31

32 AVIRIS spectra

33 Spectra of Mixed Pixels

34 Subpixel Resolution Snow Mapping from AVIRIS
(Painter et al., Remote Sens. Environ., 1998)

35 GRAIN SIZE FROM SPACE

36

37 EOS Terra MODIS Image Earth’s surface every 1 to 2 days
36 spectral bands covering VIS, NIR, thermal 1 km spatial resolution (29 bands) 500 m spatial resolution (5 bands) 250 m spatial resolution (2 bands) 2330 km swath

38 Snow Water Equivalent SWE is usually more relevant than SCA, especially for alpine terrain Gamma radiation is successful over flat terrain Passive and active microwave are used Density, wetness, layers, etc. and vegetation affect radar signal, making problem more difficult

39 SWE from Gamma There is a natural emission of Gamma from the soil (water and soil matrix) Measurement of Gamma to estimate soil moisture Difference in winter Gamma measurement and pre-snow measurement – extinction of Gamma yields SWE PROBLEM: currently only Airborne measurements (NOAA-NOHRSC)

40 Snow Measurement Airborne Snow Survey Program

41 Snow Measurement Airborne SWE Measurement Theory
Airborne SWE measurements are made using the following relationship: Where: C and C0 = Uncollided terrestrial gamma count rates over snow and dry, snow-free soil, M and M0 = Percent soil moisture over snow and dry, snow-free soil, A = Radiation attenuation coefficient in water, (cm2/g)

42 RMS Agricultural Areas: 0.81 cm
Snow Measurement Airborne SWE: Accuracy and Bias Airborne measurements include ice and standing water that ground measurements generally miss. RMS Agricultural Areas: 0.81 cm RMS Forested Areas: 2.31 cm

43 Airborne Snow Survey Products

44 Microwave Wavelengths

45 Frequency Variation for Dielectric Function and Extinction Properties
Variation in dielectric properties of ice and water at microwave wavelengths Different albedo and penetration depth for wet vs. dry snow, varying with microwave wavelength NOTE: typically satellite microwave radiation defined by its frequency (and not wavelength)

46 Dielectric Properties of Snow
Propagation and absorption of microwaves and radar in snow are a function of their dielectric constant Instrumentation: Denoth Meter, Finnish Snow Fork, TDR e = m2 and also has a real and an imaginary component

47 Modeling electromagnetic scattering and absorption
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Snow Soil

48 Volume Scattering Volume scattering is the multiple “bounces” radar may take inside the medium Volume scattering may decrease or increase image brightness In snow, volume scattering is a function of density

49 SURFACE ROUGHNESS Refers to the average height variations of the surface (snow) relative to a smooth plane Generally on the order of cms Varies with wavelength and incidence angle

50 SURFACE ROUGHNESS A surface is “smooth” if surface height variations small relative to wavelength Smooth surface much of energy goes away from sensor, appears dark Rough surface has a lot of back scatter, appears lighter

51 MICROWAVES WORK 24/7 Penetrate through cloud cover, haze, dust, and all but the heaviest rain Not scattered by the atmosphere like optical wavelengths Work at night!

52 ALL OBJECTS EMIT MICROWAVE ENERGY
Emitted by atmosphere Reflected from surface Emitted from surface Transmitted from the subsurface through snow DRY SNOW: attenuates subsurface energy WET SNOW: becomes an emission source

53 MICROWAVE MAGNITUDE Temperature Brightness (Tb)
Function of temperature and moisture content Generally very small amount of energy Need a large pixel size to have enough energy to measure

54 POLARIZATION POLARIZATION Polarization
HH (horizontal-horizontal) VV (vertical-vertical) HV (horizontal-vertical) VH (vertical-horizontal) More bands and more polarizations, more info

55 PASSIVE MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY
Passive Microwave (PM): can penetrate clouds & provide information during night Daily PM data available on a global basis Satellite Microwave data: To retrieve SWE Chang et al.,1976; Goodison et al.,1986; etc. Basis of microwave detection of snow: Redistribution of upwelling radiation (RTM, SM)

56 Passive Microwave SWE Estimates
Microwave response affected by: Liquid water content, crystal size and shape, depth and SWE, stratification, snow surface roughness, density, temperature, soil state, moisture, roughness, vegetation cover Ratio of different wavelengths Vertically polarized brightness temperature, TB, gradient Single frequency vertical polarized TB

57 Passive Microwave SWE Estimates
Advantages: Daily overpass (SSM/I, Nimbus-7 SMMR) Large coverage areas Long time series (eg. Cosmos Russia 1968) See through clouds, no dependence on the sun (unlike visible or near IR) Disadvantages Large pixel size (12.5 – 25 km) Still problems with vegetation Maximum SWE & limitations with wet snow SMMR = scanning multichannel microwave radiometer SSM/I = special sensor microwave imager

58 Passive Microwave SWE Products

59 ANOTHER PASSIVE MICROWAVE EXAMPLE

60 SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR (SAR)

61 SAR WAVELENTHS Wavebands L-band (24 cm) C-band (6 cm) X-band (3 cm)

62 Active Microwave Snow Detection
Has been used to estimate binary SCA at m resolution as compared to air photos Advantages: High resolution Detection characteristics Disadvantages: Repeat of 16 days & narrow Swath width, as per TM Commercial sensor: ERS-I/II (?), RADARSAT

63 Active Microwave SWE Estimation
Snow cover characteristics influence underlying soil temperature, this affects the dielectric constant of soil Backscatter from soil influenced by dielectric constant and by soil frost penetration depth Snow cover insulation properties influence backscatter from Bernier et al., 1999: Hydrol. Proc. 13:

64 SWE and Other Properties derived from SIR-C/X-SAR
Snow density Snow depth Particle radius Snow depth in cm Grain radius in mm Snow density Estimated Ground measurements

65 Active Microwave SWE Estimation
Thermal snow resistance (R in oCm3s/J) SWE / R Backscattering ratio (swo - sro in dB) Mean snow density (rs in km/m3) Problem: Maximum SWE detectable in order of 400 mm from Bernier et al., 1999: Hydrol. Proc. 13:

66 Weather Radar for Snowfall
Ground-based NEXRAD system covers most of the conterminous US, except some alpine areas Snowfall estimation improves with time of accumulation, not necessarily required for individual storm events like rainfall Variation in attenuation due to particle shape, wet snow, melting snow General problems with weather radar

67 Particle Characteristics Considerations
Raw Mixed precipitation Scaling removed mixed precip + particle shape from Fassnacht et al., 2001: J. Hydrol. 254:

68 Research / Operational Products
Snow-covered area Fractional SCA with Landsat or AVHRR (UAz RESAC) With AVIRIS, also get albedo Binary SCA currently from MODIS, VIIRS (NPOESS) Snow-water equivalent L-band dual polarization + C- and X-band Daily SSM/I over the Midwest and Prairies Snow wetness Near surface with AVIRIS Within 2% with C-band dual polarization


Download ppt "Remote Sensing of Snow Cover"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google