1. 1 Semester 4 Student Selected Component (SSC) Dr Tristan Pocock (tristan.pocock@manchester.ac.uk) Room 1.101 Stopford Building

2. Why group posters? Chance to work in an unsupervised group a way of presenting information to a large audience a visual summary of a group’s research a combination of text and figures designed to evoke interest in a particular theme

3. Timeline Date 31st Jan1 st PBL session – split into groups for SSC Meet in groups to discuss title/ write 50-100 word synopsis 7th FebShow title/ synopsis to PBL tutor for approval 14 th FebEmail title/ synopsis to SSC coordinator RESEARCH FOR POSTER 31 st Jan or 7 th or 14 th Feb -IT session (PC Cluster 2) 16 th April -FINISH RESEARCH/ FORMAT POSTER 3rd May

4. DEADLINE FOR UPLOADING POSTER FILE (PDF) TO BLACKBOARD: Thursday 3rd May at midday (Wk 11)

5. Poster Assessment Day Thurs 24th May 2012 Morning or Afternoon Every member of the group MUST attend their allocated Poster session

6. Choosing a topic must have a specific theme (e.g. ‘The role of brown adipose tissue in obesity’ rather than ‘Obesity’) must contain aspects of the major strands of the course: basic medical and clinical sciences (BD), behavioural and social sciences (PHI), and evidence- based medicine

7. Choosing a topic (contd) should address different levels of study: from Molecules & Membranes, through Cells & Tissues, Organs & Systems to Individuals & Society i.e. topics should reflect all of these levels to a degree

8. The Audience Peers Examiners (BD, PHI, clinicians) PBL tutors N.B. Should be pitched at fellow scientists who may not be experts in your chosen field

9. Basic medical and clinical sciences (BD) Should explain how changes to normal anatomy/ physiology give rise to the condition Should explain any relevant dietary or pharmacological interventions

10. Behavioural and social sciences (PHI) Should explore disease prevalence (epidemiology), risk factors, patients’ experience of the disease + clinician’s perspective, communication issues, psychiatry, (ethics and law) Examiners will be looking for evidence of appropriate reading/ links to relevant psychological models in these areas

11. Public health Should look at: how disease affects daily life of patients + problems faced current services available access to treatment implications for public health professional attitudes ethics and law surrounding treatments Consider how fast the field is moving – implications for re-training of health professionals

12. Presenting evidence Assertions made need to be supported by references (avoid unsupported personal opinions) Use technical names for concepts – do not ‘dumb down’ Clear and succinct descriptions

13. Synopsis Brief summary (50-100 words) of the aims of the project and intended research methods e.g. Title: Current treatments for osteoarthritis Key words: [2 contexts/ 2 vocations] This project will look at some of the risk factors for osteoarthritis, its symptoms and morphology. We will explore current treatments and care for sufferers, and the impact of the disease on close relatives. Research will be conducted using scientific databases and through investigation of patient support using websites.

14. Title/ synopsis Must be emailed to tristan.pocock@manchester.ac.uk Email must include names of students in group, SSC group no. (inc. A or B) and name of PBL tutor

15. Lay abstract MUST BE INCLUDED AT THE TOP OF POSTER! Summary of the topic, using terms which someone without a scientific background can understand Should be concise, with short words and obvious to the reader (i.e. not combined with introduction)

16. Planning groups expected to meet regularly OUTSIDE of PBL sessions EVERYONE must contribute to planning/ production of posters NON-CONTRIBUTORS should be reported to PBL tutor or me by 9 th March THE PENALTY FOR NOT CONTRIBUTING IS FAILURE OF SSC!!!

17. Peer assessment of contribution Students expected to rate the contributions of others according to: 1.Attendance at meetings 2.Communication skills/ contribution to discussion 3.Production of work within specified deadlines 4.Evidence of research 5.Contribution to poster design

18. Research look at specific journals for recent developments in understanding/ treatments of disease consult Health Care websites, e.g. http://www.dh.gov.uk to get information about patient support groups, carer information, etc http://www.dh.gov.uk contact charities or organisations specific to clinical aspect of topic N.B. You are NOT allowed to contact patients directly. It is NOT essential to interview clinicians.

19. Referencing must provide references for any work which is not your own (including any figures you include) aim for ≤ 12 refs (need to be correctly formatted) posters will put through University plagiarism detection software If your Poster contains any plagiarised material then the whole group will fail!

20. Poster Assessment Posters assessed by 3 examiners using specific criteria Examiners will look for evidence of addressing the major strands Any member of group may be asked a question about their poster Posters rated as either Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, Honours or Distinction

21. Peer Assessment You will be expected to rate the other posters in your session

22. Marking criteria Initial impact Layout/order Quantity/ subdivision of Information Use of figures Title/ abstract/ conclusions Depth/ relevance of Information Approach to topic References Lay abstract Response to questions

23. Breakdown of SSC marks 80% awarded by examiners’ mark for Group poster 20% awarded by members of the group for contribution to the exercise

24. Learning journal You will be expected to keep a learning journal throughout this exercise Could be used to provide evidence of contribution More details to follow………………

25. Role of PBL tutor to check that chosen title/ synopsis is appropriate to refer problems to me i.e. Tutors are NOT expected to guide students

26. A few key points! AVOID TOO MUCH TEXT! Keep lay abstract really simple References – <12 + readable Ensure poster reflects title + engages reader Figures – large, simple + referenced Use NICE guidelines/ stats where poss. (not FDA!)

27. Faculty of Medicine manchester.ac.uk/medicine Why posters should not be too wordy: would you spend time looking at a poster like this if you only had 10 minutes? Faculty of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PT Introduction. When the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. The idea of a poster is to display a sample of the author’s work rather than their entire career. When the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. The idea of a poster is to display a sample of the author’s work rather than their entire career. Method This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the 1 st sectionWhen the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. Blah, blah, blah, blah……. This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the 1st sectionWhen the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. Blah, blah, blah, blah……. This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the 1st sectionWhen the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. Blah, blah, blah, blah……. This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the 1st sectionWhen the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. Blah, blah, blah, blah……. Conclusion. Hopefully you’ll agree that this isn’t a very well thought out poster, because it isn’t easy to follow. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. The idea of a poster is to display a sample of the author’s work rather than their entire career. Hopefully you’ll agree that this isn’t a very well thought out poster, because it isn’t easy to follow. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. More Results. This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the other sections. When the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. REFERENCES. Mouse,M et al. (1927) Is this section so important that it needs to be in such a large font? Results. This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the 1 st sectionWhen the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. The idea of a poster is to display a sample of the author’s work rather than their entire career. This bit is just stuck out on the side and doesn’t follow logically on from the 1st sectionWhen the font is this small it makes it very difficult for the reader to read. Another thing is that there is far too much text and it is nearly all in one large block with very little space in between. If you had to read all of this text then it would be very boring and you might as well just read a paper. The idea of a poster is to display a sample of the author’s work rather than their entire career.

28. 28