1. Cases

2. Case 1 Domain name: 2012.com Respondent: – Uses subdomain london.2012.com – Makes demostrable preparations to offer sport news for users – Displays information about London, especially information for the tourists what to visit Summer olympic games – The website contains plenty of advertisement– hotels, taxis, social events

3. Case 2 Domain name: adidas-childlabour.com respondent: – Human rights group Ochranci, o. s. – Informs public about the child labour used to produce A didas products – Discourages consumers to purchase – Sells small gift producs like mugs, T-shirst, umbrellas with motives against child labour to finance their campaign

4. Deadlines Complainants 2nd of MAY – presentation 6th of MAY – complaints Defendants 16th of MAY – presentation 20th of MAY – Responses

5. Teams – Case 1 ? Complainant –Jiří Aleš –David Blaheta –Radek Valach Defendant –Ondřej Antoš –Jan Kolář –Pavel Stařičný

6. Teams – Case 2 ? Complainant –Iveta Sedláčková –Josef Hertl –Vít Kubalec Defendant –Michal Reinohl –Ivan Luksicek 51554 –Tome, Pedro Ivo Marques Oliva