1. Idaho System For Educational Excellence ISEE Update ISSA and IETA Conferences February 7 & 8 2011

2. 222 Today’s Agenda ISEE overview SRM Data Uploads What’s Next Data Quality How the data is used Reports Q&A

3. 3 Vision “Every parent and educator will have access to the data they need to guide instruction on a daily basis and measure the academic progress of all students.” -Tom Luna Superintendent of Public Instruction

4. 44

5. 55 Researchers Ease of Use Timeliness AnnuallyDaily Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular Align Data To Users De-identified, comparative data Student level, assessments, KPIs, goals Data associated with Student Stakeholders Schoolnet Data Reporting System Custom Extracts Legislators State Dept Trustees Superintendents Principals Teachers Stakeholders Legislators Researchers Stakeholders Legislators State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Daily Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Daily Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Daily Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Daily Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators Daily Timeliness Ease of Use Easy, pre-formatted Difficult, granular State Dept Researchers Stakeholders Legislators

6. 66 SRM Data Uploads December submissions –96 submitted on-time with no errors January submissions –92 submitted on-time with no errors Continual improvement in data quality Overall understanding of how the reporting works Integration and cross validation

7. 7 What’s Next On-going monthly schedule The following is the schedule for ISEE data collection and submission. Collection Period Submission Period Days to submit Deadline: w/errorsMidnight on 1/8 – 2/4/201 2/4 – 2/18/2011 2/17 & 2/18/2011 2/18/2011 2/5 – 3/4/2011 3/4 – 3/18/2011 3/17 & 3/18/2011 3/18/2011 3/5 – 4/1/ 2011 4/1 – 4/15/2011 4/14 & 4/15/2011 4/15/2011 4/2 – 5/6/2011 5/6 – 5/20/2011 5/19 & 5/20/2011 5/20/2011 5/6 – 6/3/2011 6/3 – 6/17/2011 6/16 & 6/17/2011 6/17/2011 6/4 – 7/1/2011 7/1 – 7/15/2011 7/14 & 7/15/2011 7/15/2011 7/ 2 – 8/5/2011 8/5 – 8/19/2011 8/18 & 8/19/2011 8/19/2011 8/6 – 9/2/2011 9/2 – 9/16/2011 9/15 & 9/16/2011 9/16/2011 9/3 – 10/7/201110/7 – 10/20/2011 10/19 & 10/20/201110/20/2011 10/8 – 11/4/201111/4 – 11/18/2011 11/18 & 11/18/201111/18/2011

8. 8 What’s Next Reporting requirements –Teacher & Principal Evaluation Information –Due in the March upload Currently on Staff Demo & Employment Template –If evaluation date is in the future Record the future date for the evaluation No Scoring required if date is in the future –If evaluation has taken place Record score based on option & if student achievement was part of the consideration

9. 9 What’s Next Staff Evaluation – Details –Staff Evaluation Elements In the Staff Demographics & Employment File –Items 53-55 Evaluation Date – must be in valid date format –Definition: For Teachers and Principals, the date when their evaluation is expected to be final. NOTE: Optional until March 2011 Evaluation Results – choose from option set –Definition: For Teachers and Principals, if the evaluation is complete (evaluation date is in the past) then what is the performance level from the evaluation. NOTE: Optional until March 2011 Student Performance Considered - Y/N/X option set –Definition: For Teachers and Principals, is student performance or student growth included in the staff members evaluation. NOTE: Optional until March 2011

10. 10 What’s Next Staff Evaluation – Details –Based on plans submitted last year to the SDE using the Charlotte Danielson methodology –Staff Evaluation Levels (Option Sets) Staff Evaluation Level DDistinguished (or district equivalent) Staff Evaluation Level PProficient (or district equivalent) Staff Evaluation Level BBasic (or district equivalent) Staff Evaluation Level UUnsatisfactory (or district equivalent)

11. 11 Data Quality Accurate Data reported each month –Creating a “digital backpack” –A correct reflection on student and staff information Course information –Actual course code of what the student is taking –Actual staff assignment of what the staff member is doing Special program information –Current status of students and programs

12. 12 Data Usage How is the data used –To calculate student attendance & enrollment –To calculate staffing information –To populate programs iPass Child Count SchoolNet DRS

13. 13 Data Usage Reports – Attendance and Enrollment District Name 000-District Name

14. 14 Data Usage Programs – iPass List of Student Names Name

15. 15 Data Usage Programs – Child Count –If students were correctly listed in Special Ed file they will automatically appear in the drop down – same with teacher Jones Missy 1/1/2011 123456789

16. 16 Data Usage Programs – DRS –De-identifiable data for multiple uses

17. 17 Data Usage Programs – SchoolNet –Individual student information for specific stakeholders Superintendents – view entire district Principals – view of all classes within school Teachers – view of students within their class

18. 18 ISEE-Schoolnet Digital Backpack –Consolidate State Assessment Results: ISAT, IRI, IELA & ACT –Enrollment, completion, grades Key Performance Indicators –Goals & Exemplars Reports

19. 19 Schoolnet Assessments with Student Reports will not match building reports ISAT is not AYP

20. 20 District View Note: This is demonstration data, it is not intended to represent district or student performance

21. 21 Subject View Note: This is demonstration data, it is not intended to represent district or student performance

22. 22 Class Roster View Note: This is demonstration data, it is not intended to represent district or student performance

23. 23 Digital Backpack

24. 24 Assessment Detail

25. 25 ISEE Contacts Troy Wheeler - CIO twheeler@sde.idaho.gov Joyce Popp - ISEE jpopp@sde.idaho.gov Greg Berg - Attendance & Enrollment Reports (Finance) gdberg@sde.idaho.gov Kathy Vincen - Staffing Reports (Finance) klvincen@sde.idaho.gov Support, access, general information Support@sde.idaho.gov