2. PLEASE PUT ASSIGNMENT #4 FACE DOWN IN BASKET ON CHAIR  MUSIC: Bach, Concertos for Two Harpsichords (1732-36) THE ENGLISH CONCERT Trevor Pinnock, Conductor, Harpsichord Kenneth Gilbert, Harpsichord Performed 1980

3. DQ121: Storage as “School Purpose”

4. DQ121: IS STORAGE A “SCHOOL PURPOSE”? PARTIES’ LIKELY ARGUMENTS For School District? For Future Interest Holder?

5. DQ121:IS STORAGE A “SCHOOL PURPOSE”? What legal research could you do to help resolve this question?

6. DQ121:IS STORAGE A “SCHOOL PURPOSE”? What legal research could you do to help resolve this question? CASES ON “SCHOOL PURPOSE” CASES ON “CHURCH PURPOSE” ETC.

7. DQ121:IS STORAGE A “SCHOOL PURPOSE”? What factual research could you do to help resolve this question? (What facts matter?)

8. IS STORAGE A “SCHOOL PURPOSE”? What facts matter?: USE OF SPACE What is stored & how used? Alternatives (crowding? Cost?) How regularly is storage accessed?

9. IS STORAGE A “SCHOOL PURPOSE”? What facts matter?: GRANTOR’S INTENT CHECK GRANT OR RELATED DOX WITNESSES TO TRANSACTION ASK GRANTOR IF ALIVE WITNESSES RE GRANTOR BELIEFS

10. DQ122. Why should we allow grantors to have any control at all of what happens to land after they have died? Come back to later w Shapira

11. PROBLEM 7I Featuring Halloween Corn

12. (7I) O conveys "to J and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, O retains a right to re-enter the premises." J opens a restaurant that serves several dishes cooked with wine or flamed with brandy and at Sunday brunch offers a free glass of champagne. The restaurant is successful, and 11 years after its opening D wants to buy it and add a bar. Advise D.

13. PROBLEM 7I: MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

14. PROBLEM I: MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

15. (I): O “To Julia and her heirs so long as the premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on the premises, Orrin retains a right to re-enter the premises." Does Orrin’s interest vest automatically (FSD) or does he have to act (FSCS)?

16. FSD or FSCS? “ So long as” & condition built into 1 st clause suggest FSD Moment of violation clear, so can be FSD “Right to re-enter” & 2 clauses suggest FSCS “retains” suggests FSCS b/c implies that O’s right can held for some period of time after violation Most states: presumption favoring FSCS Mahrenholz: More like punishment than purpose

17. PROBLEM 7I: MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

18. (7I): O “To J … so long as … premises are not used for sale of beer, wine, or liquor, and if beer, wine, or liquor is sold on... premises O retains a right to re-enter….” DOES IT VIOLATE GRANT IF J’s restaurant: (i) serves several dishes cooked with wine or flamed with brandy? (ii) at Sunday brunch offers complimentary glass of champagne?

19. PROBLEM 7I: MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

20. IF VIOLATION, RESULT? If O has Possibility of Reverter? O gets legal title at moment of violation. If sufficient time has passed, J may have title through adverse possession

21. IF VIOLATION, RESULT? If O has Right of Entry (RE)? Assuming O has not acted, O still has RE If O is aware of Julia’s use of alcohol, may be held to have waived the right to enforce regarding these kinds of uses of alcohol.

22. PROBLEM 7I: MULTI-STEP ANALYSIS FSD or FSCS? CONDITION VIOLATED? EFFECT OF VIOLATION? ADVICE RE PURCHASE

23. Note that if J sells a defeasible fee to D, D takes subject to any condition not made irrelevant by the sale. To J so long as alcohol is never used on the premises. – Wording of condition not limited to J; appears to apply to anyone – Condition survives sale.

24. COMPARE: To J so long as J never uses alcohol on the premises. – Condition only places limit on J. – Essentially void if J is not the owner. – Once J is dead, condition can never be violated, so owner would have fee simple absolute.

25. 11 years after its opening Donald wants to buy restaurant and add a bar. Advise Donald.

26. Plausible Advice to Donald Includes : Buy both present estate and future interest (or “all rights” of both J and O) to merge into f.s.absolute Serve free liquor & raise prices (and argue waiver if O questions) Make purchase contingent on J insuring right to use alcohol (winning suit re adverse possession/ waiver/etc.; buying future interest; waiver K with O)

27. LOGISTICS Choosing 1L Elective: I’ll Discuss on the Friday Before You Register Seating available in front for this unit Exam Drafting : – E1 Names – Schedule: Draft, Seal, Reinforce

28. LOGISTICS Office Hours – Extra Office Hours Next Week – Listed on Course Page & on My Door – No Appointments & Multiple People – Wed & Thu Evenings in Library Rooms

29. LOGISTICS Postings – Sample Questions on Course Page Now – Answers/Explanations Posted Today – Tuesday: Two Complete Old Exams & Answers – Thursday: Write-Up of 7P-7S

30. LOGISTICS Shapira (M/T): DQ123 (Barley) asks re arguments in case; I’ll frame in terms of key distinctions made by court: – Court distinguishes between X & Y – What is the distinction it makes? – Why is it significant?

31. EXECUTORY INTERESTS Future interest in grantee Cuts off prior vested interest (present estate or reversion or vested remainder) rather than waiting for it to expire naturally.

32. Pre-1536 (= Pre- “Common Law”) Limitations on Future Interests in Grantees Must follow finite estate Must be capable of taking effect at the expiration of preceding estate Must not take effect before the expiration of the preceding estate

33. EXECUTORY INTERESTS Future interest in grantee Cuts off prior vested interest rather than waiting for it to expire naturally. Shifting Executory Interest cuts off another grantee

34. EXECUTORY INTERESTS Future interest in grantee Cuts off prior vested interest rather than waiting for it to expire naturally. Shifting Executory Interest cuts off another grantee Springing Executory Interest cuts off grantor

35. EXECUTORY INTERESTS (EXAMPLES) Shifting Executory Interest: To Justin & his heirs so long as no tobacco is grown on the land, otherwise to Eric and his heirs.

36. EXECUTORY INTERESTS (EXAMPLES) Springing Executory Interest: To Crystal if she passes the California bar exam.

37. (7F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica: Life Estate Betty: Contingent Remainder in Fee Simple Reggie: Reversion What happens if Veronica dies when Betty is 17?

38. (7F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” What happens if Veronica dies when Betty is 17? (Common Law): destroyed If contingency not met when prior estate ends, contingent remainder is destroyed. Betty has nothing. Reggie has fee simple absolute.

39. DOCTRINE OF DESTRUCTABILITY OF CONTINGENT REMAINDERS destroyed If contingency not met when prior estate ends, contingent remainder is destroyed

40. DOCTRINE OF DESTRUCTABILITY OF CONTINGENT REMAINDERS Overruled by statute or caselaw in every American jurisdiction except …

41. DOCTRINE OF DESTRUCTABILITY OF CONTINGENT REMAINDERS Overruled by statute or caselaw in every American jurisdiction except... Florida

42. (7F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” What happens if Veronica dies when Betty is 17? (Modern View): If contingency not met when prior estate ends, we wait to see if it is met later. Betty’s remainder becomes an executory interest. Reggie has fee simple on executory limitation

43. (7F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica dies; Betty is 17 (Modern View)

44. DOCTRINE OF DESTRUCTABILITY OF CONTINGENT REMAINDERS (Second Common Application) Where there is a life estate, one or more contingent remainders, and a reversion, and the life estate and reversion merge into a fee simple, the contingent remainders are destroyed.

45. (7F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica buys R’s reversion. If destructability applies: V has fee simple absolute.

46. (7F) Reggie “to Veronica for life, then to Betty and her heirs if Betty attains the age of 21.” Veronica buys R’s reversion (Modern View: Merger Without Destruction)

47. Problems 7J-7K-7L

48. (7J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda?

49. (7J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted?

50. (7J):Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted?: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Other?

51. (7J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Ted?: Contingent Remainder (in f.s.) Mary: Reversion

52. (7J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Mary Rhoda a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate What difference does change make?

53. (7J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Rhoda a proper funeral." Ted can’t possibly give Rhoda a “proper” funeral by the time Rhoda dies. Thus, Ted’s interest cannot be a remainder; there will be a gap between the end of R’s life estate and Ted’s interest. So Ted has …?

54. (7J): Mary "to Rhoda for life, then to Ted if Ted gives Rhoda a proper funeral." Rhoda: Life Estate Mary: Reversion Ted: Springing Executory Interest (in f.s.)

55. EXAM TIP: USE COMMON SENSE!! Can’t give a “proper” funeral to a person until after the person has died.

56. EXAM TIP: USE COMMON SENSE!! If an interest is conveyed in a will, the grantor is dead.

57. Vested Remainder Subject to Divestment = Vested Remainder Subject to Complete Defeasance (P596)

58. CONTINGENT REMAINDER v. VESTED REMAINDER SUBJECT TO DIVESTMENT (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs.

59. CONTINGENT REMAINDER v. VESTED REMAINDER SUBJECT TO DIVESTMENT (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. A alive; B dies at 17: (1+2) B gets 0; C gets fee simple at A’s death

60. CONTINGENT REMAINDER v. VESTED REMAINDER SUBJECT TO DIVESTMENT (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. A alive; B turns 21: (1+2) B has vested remainder; C’s interest fails

61. CONTINGENT REMAINDER v. VESTED REMAINDER SUBJECT TO DIVESTMENT (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. A dies; B is 17: (1) Grantor has fee simple on executory limitation; B & C have springing executory interests.

62. (1) To A for life, then to B & her heirs if she turns 21, but if B dies before 21, then to C and his heirs. (2) To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before 21, then to C & his heirs. A dies; B is 17: (1) Grantor has fee simple on executory limitation; B & C have springing executory interests. (2) B has fee simple on executory limitation; C has shifting executory interest.

63. VESTED REMAINDER SUBJECT TO DIVESTMENT v. VESTED REMAINDER IN FEE SIMPLE ON EXECUTORY LIMITATION To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B dies before turning 21, then to C & his heirs. Condition can occur before B obtains possession.

64. VESTED REMAINDER SUBJECT TO DIVESTMENT v. VESTED REMAINDER IN FEE SIMPLE ON EXECUTORY LIMITATION To A for life, then to B & her heirs, but if B ever uses the land for commercial purposes, to C & his heirs. (Condition cannot occur before B obtains possession)

65. COMMON MISTAKES Contingent Remainder Subject to Open Contingent Remainder Subject to Divestment Executory Interest Subject to Divestment

66. COMMON MISTAKES Contingent Remainder Subject to Open Contingent Rem. Subject to Divestment Executory Interest Subject to Divestment

67. (7K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George?

68. (7K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George: Life Estate Kramer?

69. (7K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George: Life Estate Kramer: Vested Remainder (in f.s.) subject to divestment Elaine?

70. (7K): “To George for life, then to Kramer and his heirs; but if Kramer does not attain the age of 21, then to Elaine and her heirs." Kramer is 15 years old. George: Life Estate Kramer: Vested Remainder (in f.s.) subject to divestment Elaine: Shifting executory interest (in f.s.)

71. (7L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety?

72. (7L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children?

73. (7L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent remainders (in f.s.) (must survive Tweety) Peggy?

74. ALTERNATIVE CONTINGENT REMAINDERS Two contingent remainders for which the event that causes one to vest will destroy the other.

75. ALTERNATIVE CONTINGENT REMAINDERS Two contingent remainders for which the event that causes each one to vest will destroy the other. Here, only two possibilities: either (1) Tweety will be survived by children (who would then take) or (2) he won’t (Peggy takes)

76. (7L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety has 2 children, Heckle and Jeckle. Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent remainders (in f.s.) (must survive Tweety) Peggy: Alternative contingent rem. (in f.s.) Other?

77. (7L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety: Life Estate Tweety’s Children: Contingent remainders (in f.s.) Peggy: Alternative contingent rem. (in f.s.) Daffy: Reversion (even when alternate contingent remainders)

78. (7L): Daffy "to Tweety for life, then to such of Tweety's children as survive him, but if none of Tweety's children survives him, then to Peggy and her heirs." Tweety: Life Estate Heckle/Jeckle: Contingent remainders (in f.s.) Peggy: Alternative contingent rem. (in f.s.) Daffy: Reversion