1. OASIS LegalXML Member Section April 27, 2005 John Greacen, Chair Roger Winters, Secretary Member Section Steering Committee

2. Special Characteristics of the LegalXML Member Section We are primarily users and consumers, not developers or vendors, of XML products We include large numbers of public sector members We have strong ties to public sector policy making groups We perceive our TCs to be perpetual entities – overseeing and improving standards once they have been developed We have historically been unwilling to promulgate any standards that include private IPR claims; that provision was included in our ROP upon joining OASIS

3. Membership 83 members 4 sponsors 32 contributing organizations

4. Technical Committees Contracts Electronic Court Filing eNotary Integrated Justice odrXML (?) Legislative & Regulatory Compliance (?)

5. Steering Committee Members Don Bergeron – LexisNexis (Legislative & Regulatory Compliance) Jim Cabral – MTG Management Consultants, LLC (Integrated Justice) Robin Gibson – Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator (at large) John Greacen – Greacen Associates, LLC (at large) Dave Marvit – Fujitsu (Contracts) John Messing – Private Attorney/American Bar Association/Law on Line (eNotary) Debi Miller-Moore – American Arbitration Association (odrXML) Dallas Powell – Tybera (at large) Roger Winters – King County Department of Judicial Administration (Electronic Court Filing)

6. History 1998 – Legal XML established with 17 members. Grew to over 800 members. 2001 – Legal XML, Inc. created; schism with Todd Vincent 2002 – Merger with OASIS

7. Committee Specifications – All DTDs Electronic Court Filing 1.0 Electronic Court Filing 1.1 Court Document 1.1 Query & Response 1.1

8. Member Section Mission and Vision Statements Mission Statement The OASIS LegalXML Member Section develops open, non-proprietary technical standards for structuring legal documents and information using XML and related technologies. Vision Statement Courts, lawyers, criminal justice agencies, legislatures, libraries, publishers and other participants in the civil and criminal legal systems use XML standards to maintain and share electronic legal records cheaply, seamlessly and securely.

9. 2005 Spending Plan Consultant to assist in drafting requirements, specifications and schemas -- $40,000 TC and Steering Committee meeting expenses -- $25,000 Conference calling service -- $2,400 Total -- $67,400

10. Accomplishments in 2004 Development of Global Justice XML Data Model reference documents Development of requirements for contracts and next generation of court filing standards Recruitment of National Notary Association to join eNotary TC Hiring of consultant

11. Goals for 2005 Complete Court Filing Blue specification and schemas (July 1) Complete GJXDM Reference Document Methodology, Naming and Design Rules (MNDR) specification Complete and vet contracts requirements Complete requirements for notary standard for transmitting notary journal data from individual desktops or registries to public central registries located in public sector facilities Establish Legislative & Regulatory Compliance TC (if sufficient interest exists) Revitalize On Line Dispute Resolution XML TC

12. Member Section Concerns The Board’s unwillingness to assign all LegalXML Member Section TCs to the RF on Limited Terms IPR status The Board’s failure yet to create a $250 governmental membership category The Board’s continuing requirement that all TCs include tasks and timelines in their Charters The clumsiness of KAVI’s handling of documents