Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAusten Richards Modified over 9 years ago
1
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Contributions / input by: Hendrik Reich, Andreas Rhodin, Klaus Stephan, Werner Wergen (DWD) Daniel Leuenberger, Tanja Weusthoff (MeteoSwiss) Marek Lazanowicz (IMGW) Mikhail Tsyrulnikov (HMC) PP Kenda : Status Report christoph.schraff@dwd.de Deutscher Wetterdienst, D-63067 Offenbach, Germany status & outlook general issues in the convective scale experiments for assessing importance of km-scale details in IC deterministic analysis
2
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 1:General issues in the convective scale and evaluation of COSMO-DE-EPS Purpose: Guides decision how resources will be spent on/ split betw. LETKF and SIR (COSMO-NWS and universities); part of the learning process main disadvantage of LETKF: assumes Gaussian error distributions Task 1.1.A: investigate non-Gaussianity by means of O – B statistics (convective / larger scales, different forecast lead times): provides an upper limit estimate of the non-Gaussianity to deal with talk by Daniel Leuenberger: Statistical characteristics of high-resolution COSMO Ensemble forecasts in view of Data Assimilation Task 1.2: investigate non-Gaussianity by examining perturbations of very-short range (2009) forecasts from COSMO-DE-EPS
3
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de RWWRP / THORPEX Workshop on 4D-Var and EnKF intercomparison we should continue with KENDA (LETKF) as planned (4DVAR / EnKF ok for HR DA: everybody pushes the way further on the current road; ensemble size stable (30 – 40); synergistic approaches) model errors a (the) key issue for advanced DA important for DA to work on model improvement worthwhile to obtain options for EnKF implementations which also make use of 3DVar (by implementing tasks 2.1, 2.5) talk by Breogan Gomez: Single-column experiments on the vertical localisation in the LETKF difficulty of assimilating non-local satellite data and achieving good resolution in local analysis Task 1.4: M. Tsyrulnikov: Review on Hunt et al. implementation of LETKF
4
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 1.1 D: assess importance of km-scale details versus larger-scale conditions in the IC (do we have to analyse the small scales, or is it sufficient to analyse the large scales, as e.g. incremental 4DVAR (ECMWF) would do ?) Comparison: ‘IEU’: IC from interpolated COSMO-EU analysis of ass. cycle (no LHN) ‘IDE’: IC from COSMO-DE analysis of ass. cycle (no LHN) ‘LHN’: IC from COSMO-DE analysis of ass. cycle (IDE + LHN for use of radar- derived precipitation) Note:– IC from assimilation cycle → late cut-off, very similar set of observations – identical correlation functions (scales) used in nudging for IEU and IDE – identical soil moisture, taken from IEU (with variational soil moisture initialisation) – model version as operational in summer 2009 Period:31 May – 13 June 2007: air mass convection
5
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de 00 UTC runs06 UTC runs ETS FBI LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) 31.05. – 13.06.07: air-mass convection # radar ‘obs’ with rain LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) time of day 0.1 mm
6
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de 00 UTC runs06 UTC runs ETS FBI LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) 31.05. – 13.06.07: air-mass convection # radar ‘obs’ with rain LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) time of day 1 mm
7
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de 12 UTC runs18 UTC runs ETS FBI LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) 31.05. – 13.06.07: air-mass convection 0.1 mm # radar ‘obs’ with rain LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) time of day 1218
8
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de 12 UTC runs18 UTC runs ETS FBI LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) 31.05. – 13.06.07: air-mass convection 1 mm # radar ‘obs’ with rain LHN IDE (no-LHN) IEU (coarse IC) time of day
9
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de 12- UTC runs, 6 – 18 h fcsts. (nighttime precipitation) radar (12-h sum)LHN (fine-scale IC)IEU (coarse IC) 10 June 18 UTC – 11 June 06 UTC 2007 4 June 18 UTC – 5 June 06 UTC 2007 Examples
10
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 1.1.D: assess importance of km-scale details Results of comparison to coarse-scale ‘IEU’ : ─‘IDE’ better than ‘IEU’ for 12- and 18-UTC runs up to +15h (similar FBI, higher ETS) similar for 0- and 6-UTC runs ─improvement by LHN during first 6 hours ─‘LHN’ has better precipitation patterns (6 – 18 h forecast) than ‘IEU’ in some cases Radar With LHN Without LHN (dashed: determininistic) Past experiments (Leuenberger): environment affects impact of fine-scale details in analysis from LHN
11
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 2:Technical implementation of an ensemble data assimilation framework / LETKF analysis step (LETKF) outside COSMO code ensemble of independent COSMO runs up to next analysis time separate analysis step code, LETKF included in 3DVAR code of DWD
12
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de perturbed forecasts – ensemble mean forecast (local, inflated) transform matrix W a analysis meanperturbed analyses LOCAL Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) (chart based on a slide of Neil Bowler, UK MetOffice) = background perturbations X b → flow-dep. backgr. error covar. analysis error covariance in the (5-dimensional) sub-space S spanned by background perturbations : (linearise obs operator around the mean of ensemble of simulations of an obs) explicit solution for minimisation of cost function (Hunt et al., 2007) ( - ) + = 0.9 Pert 1 -0.1 Pert 2 -0.1 Pert 3 -0.1 Pert 4 -0.1 Pert 5 → analysis ensemble member : and in model space : → analysis (mean) and analysis error covariance : columns of
13
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Analysis for a deterministic forecast run : use Kalman Gain K of analysis mean K is already computed in the (L)ETKF ; if the resolution of the deterministic run is higher than of ensemble, the analysis increments have to be interpolated to the fine grid determ. Kalman gain / analysis increments not optimal, if deterministic run (strongly) deviates from analysis mean of ensemble
14
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de LETKF COSMO read obs (NetCDF) + Grib analysis of ensemble member compute obs–fg (obs. increm.) + QC (contains obs operator) write NetCDF feedback files (obs + obs–fg + QC flags) + Grib files (model) read ensemble of NetCDF feedback files + ensemble of COSMO S-R forecast Grib files perform LETKF (based on obs–fg values around each grid pt., calc. transformation matrices and analysis (mean & pert.)) (adapt: C-grid, specific variables (w), efficiency) write ensemble of COSMO S-R analysis Grib files + NetCDF feedback files with additional QC flags ( verif.) exp. system Task 2.3: finished Task 2.2: almost finished Task 2.4: not yet done However: scripts written to do a few stand-alone cycles with LETKF → preliminary tests can start soon
15
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de y: observations x: model state d = y – H(x): innovation H: observation operator qf: quality flag QC: quality control Verification / diagnostics: new ‘stat’ tool : compute model (forecast) – obs, as input for verification GRIB new tool (included in 3DVar code) NetCDF observation y qf read obs write feed- back x H(x) QC H read feedback y qf H(x) read grib NetCDF feedback y, qf, d want have capability of computing distance of model (ensemble member) to observations that have not been used previously in a COSMO run ( SIRF) need to include NetCDF observation QC H & in ‘stat’ module common codes in COSMO & ‘stat’ tool
16
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 2.1: extract from COSMO: - ‘library 2’ : in progress - ‘library 1’ : finished Task 2.5:- in progress: include above libraries in 3DVar environment, (translate COSMO data structure into 3DVar data structure and vice versa) - not yet started: extend flow control (e.g. reading several Grib files and temporal interpolat.) Task 2:Technical implementation of an ensemble data assimilation framework / LETKF for verification: ‘stat’-module: compute model (forecast) – obs : adapt verification mode of 3DVar/LETKF package Advantages: –COSMO obs operators available in 3DVAR/LETKF environment 3DVar/ EnKF approaches requiring 3DVar in principle applicable to COSMO LETKF for ICON will require COSMO obs operators in the future –1 common code for GME/ICON and COSMO to produce input for diagnostics / verif.. Disadvantages: – more complex code for this diagnostic task – possibly additional transformation from COSMO data structure into 3DVAR data structure and vice versa required for new COSMO obs operators. observation operators H with QC modules for reading obs from NetCDF Task 2.6: Adapt ensemble-related diagnostic tools : not yet started
17
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 3: Evaluate and tune LETKF address primary scientific issues related to the LETKF on the convective scale (using only in-situ data at first) investigate / control noise, adapt in view of non-hydrostatic aspects if mixing of hydrostatically balanced model states (ensemble forecasts) varies with height (vertical localisation), the resulting model analysis will usually not be hydrostatically balanced →get version that can be used to do first tests with radar radial winds primary scientific issues: – model model (physical) perturbations – multiplicative covariance inflation – localisation (multi-scale DA) – additive covariance inflation with red noise, backscatter, statistical forecast error covariances (‘3DVAR-B’) ‘ – bias removal – noise control (update frequency, digital filter initialisation, lateral boundary cond.) – (convection initiation (warm bubbles, LHN)
18
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de Task 4: Inclusion of additional observations Research funded by DWD to develop suitably sophisticated + efficient observation operators for radar data (radial winds + (3-dim.) reflectivity) (Blahak + 2 PhD’s) Task 4.1: Radar radial winds: implement simple obs operator, then test and tune particular issues: obs error variances and correlations, superobbing, thinning, localisation Task 4.2: Radar reflectivity (after 2010): Task 4.3: Ground-based GPS slant path delay (after 2010): particular issue: localisation for non-local obs Task 4.4: Cloud info based on satellite and conventional data (DWD: applied for Eumetsat fellowship, start end of 2010) derive incomplete cloud analysis, use obs increments of cloud or humidity use SEVIRI brightness temperature directly in LETKF in cloudy (+ cloud-free) conditions Task 5: Sequential importance resampling (SIR) filter research projects continue within DAQUA (MeteoSwiss investigating on norms)
19
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de thank you for your attention
20
KENDA (Km-Scale Ensemble-based Data Assimilation) COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept. 2009 KENDA christoph.schraff@dwd.de set up (G-) SIRF test with COPS period time Weighting + Resampling Guiding steps Weighting + Resampling final weighting after free forecast is computed SREPS (ass.) SREPS (pred.) radar / satellite / in-situ obs. free forecast … … HRES select best members ( ≤10 ) Set up standard and G-SIRF with and without standard data assimilation (MIUB, DWD) assess impact of conventional DA (LHN, PIB) on ensemble development (spread generation, keeping ensemble on track) implement optimal stepping to a new driving mesoscale ensemble Evaluate classical and spatial (object oriented, fuzzy) metrics for weighting mesoscale (SREPS) and km-scale ensemble members (DLR, MCH) assess correlation of metrics betw. models of different res. assess persistence of skill in different metrics
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.