Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJosephine Wood Modified over 9 years ago
1
Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no special formulas, etc. – 75% of students need to pass the Reading/Writing SOL tests, 70% need to pass the other 3 core subjects. Schools may use a 3 year average to meet the benchmark. High Schools have a Graduation benchmark as well. II.AMO (Federal Accountability (Annual Measurable Objectives) Used to be AYP, but is now based on Virginia’s waiver from NCLB Different benchmarks for different membership groups Each school and the Division has 36 benchmarks to meet in participation and performance categories for Math and Reading (High Schools also have a graduation benchmark). Schools /Division not meeting one of the 36 benchmarks does not meet AMO HOW TO MEET BENCMARKS: 1) Meet the current benchmark or exceed last year’s pass rate - whichever is higher OR 2) Meet the benchmark using 3-year average, (can only use 3-year average if you did not meet the benchmark last year) OR 3) Decrease the failure rate from last year by 10% OR 4) Have less than 30 in the category 5) High schools must have 80% of graduating seniors receive a regular or advanced diploma in all membership groups
2
REVISED AMO TARGETS REVISED MATH AMO TARGETS Accountability Year 12-1313-1414-1515-1616-1717-18 (11-12)(12-13)(13-14)(14-15)(15-16)(16-17) All Students 616466687073 Gap Group I 475257636873 Gap Group 2 455156626773 Gap Group 3 525660656973 SWD 334149576573 ELL 394653596673 Econ. Disadvantaged 475257636873 Asian 8283Continuous Progress White 687072747678 REVISED READING AMO TARGETS Accountability Year 12-1313-1414-1515-1616-1717-18 (11-12)(12-13)(13-14)(14-15)(15-16)(16-17) All Students 856669727578 Gap Group I 765259657278 Gap Group 2 764957647178 Gap Group 3 805360667278 SWD 593042546678 ELL 764452616978 Econ. Disadvantaged 765259657278 Asian 9280Continuous Progress White 907475767778 Gap Group 1 = SWD, ELL, Econ. Disadvantaged Gap group 2 = African American Gap Group 3 = Hispanic
3
New Methodology for AMO SubgroupStudents Passing Total Students Pass RateAMOAMO Met? Econ. Disadv.3-Year8917152.04%52%YES Current175630.35%52%NO Previous225044.00%47% School A makes AMO for this category by using the 3-year average. School may use the 3- year average because they did not meet AMO last year SubgroupStudents Passing Total students Pass RateAMOAMO Met? Econ. Disadv.3-year17322875.87%52% Current537768.83%52%NO Previous557474.32%47% School B below DOES NOT meet AMO. School did surpass the AMO, but had to do better than last year because that was higher than the current AMO. School could not use 3-year average because they met AMO last year
4
Highlights Grades 4 through EOC Reading pass rates met or surpassed the State pass rates. Grade 4 Math, Algebra II, and Geometry improved over 2012 Grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and EOC Math pass rates met or surpassed the State pass rates Challenges Grade 3 Math is several percentage points below the state average (65 % and 57%). Grade 8 Math is several percentage points below the state average (61% and 54%) Special Education Graduation rate used for AMO continues to be well below AMO
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.