Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 1 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Automatic Transition Prediction and.

Published byEvelyn Fowler Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 1 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Automatic Transition Prediction and."— Presentation transcript:

1 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 1 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Automatic Transition Prediction and Application to 3D High-Lift Configurations Andreas Krumbein German Aerospace Center - DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Numerical Methods

2 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 2 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Outline Introduction Transition Prediction Coupling Structure Test Cases Computational Results Conclusion Outlook Outline

3 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 3 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Introduction Aircraft industry requirements: RANS based CFD tool with transition prediction Automatic, no intervention of the user Reduction of modeling based uncertainties Accuracy of results from fully turbulent flow or flow with prescribed transition often not satisfactory Improved simulation of the interaction between transition locations and separation

4 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 4 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Introduction Different approaches: RANS solver+ stability code + e N method RANS solver+ boundary layer code + stability code + e N method RANS solver+ boundary layer code + e N database method(s) RANS solver+ transition closure model or transition/turbulence model

5 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 5 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Introduction Different approaches: RANS solver+ stability code + e N method RANS solver+ boundary layer code + stability code + e N method RANS solver+ boundary layer code + e N database method(s) RANS solver+ transition closure model or transition/turbulence model

6 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 6 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Introduction Objectives of the talk: Documentation of the 1 st application of the complete system to an industrially relevant aircraft configuration with a multi-element wing Documentation of the results for different flow conditions: fully turbulent flow, flow with prescribed and predicted transition Demonstration that the technique is ready to be applied to complex configurations Demonstration that the underlying procedure yields reasonable results for a complex configuration

7 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 7 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Transition Prediction Coupling Structure Coupling Structure cycle = k cyc

8 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 8 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Coupling Structure Transition Prediction Module: Laminar boundary-layer method for swept, tapered wings (conical flow) e N database-methods for Tollmien-Schichting and Cross Flow instabilities Laminar separation approximates transition if transition downstream of laminar separation point 2d, 2.5d (infinite swept) + 3d wings Single + multi-element configurations N factor integration along chordwise gridlines Attachment line transition, by-pass transition & transition inside laminar separation bubbles not yet covered

9 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 9 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Coupling Structure Structured RANS solver FLOWer: 3D RANS, compressible, steady/unsteady Structured body-fitted multi-block meshes Finite volume formulation Cell-vertex and cell-centered spatial discretizations schemes Central differencing, 2 nd & 4 th order artificial dissipation scaled by largest eigenvalue Explicit Runge-Kutta time integration Steady: local time stepping & implicit residual smoothing, embedded in a multi-grid algorithm eddy viscosity TMs (Boussinesq) & alg./diff. RSMs

10 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 10 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein P T upp (sec = 1) P T upp (sec = 2) P T upp (sec = 3) Coupling Structure Transition Prescription: Automatic partitioning into laminar and turbulent zones individually for each element Laminar points: S t,p  0 Independent of topology P T upp (sec = 4)

11 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 11 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Test Cases KH3Y geometry (DLR F11 model) Half-model with Airbus A340 fuselage Wing-body with full span slat and flap high-lift system Landing configuration:  S = 26.5°,  F = 32.0° Measurements European High Lift Programme (EUROLIFT), partly funded by EU Airbus LSWT (Bremen, Germany) Re  = 1.35 mio., M  = 0.174 Transition band on fuselage, 30mm downstream of the nose

12 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 12 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Test Cases Computations  = 10.0° and 14.0° Fully turbulent, prescribed & predicted transition Spalart-Allmaras one-equation TM with Edwards & Chandra mod. 97 blocks, 5.5 mio. points, 96.500 on surface Transition prediction in sections: 11 on slat 13 on main wing 13 on flap Calibration of critical N factors:  = 10°, hot film on main wing upper side at 68% span  (x T /c) main = 0.08  N TS = 4.9 No indications for CF  N CF = N TS

13 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 13 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Test Cases ‘Point transition‘ (no transitional flow model) Prescribed transition lines: hot film data slat &main wing 68% span  = 10°, upper side  = 10°, lower side  = 10.0°  = 14.0° elemupper sidelower sideupper sidelower side slat(x T /c) slat = 0.21at TE(x T /c) slat = 0.11at TE main(x T /c) main = 0.08at TE(x T /c) main = 0.05(x T /c) main = 0.15 flapbeneath main TEat TEbeneath main TEat TE

14 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 14 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Results  = 10°, upper side prescribed  = 10°, upper side predicted  = 10.0°, upper side: laminar surface regions Computational Results

15 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 15 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Results  = 10°, lower side prescribed  = 10°, lower side predicted  = 10.0°, lower side: laminar surface regions

16 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 16 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Results  = 14.0°, upper side: laminar surface regions  = 14°, upper side prescribed  = 14°, upper side predicted

17 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 17 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Results  = 14.0°: laminar surface regions & transition labels TS  = 14°, upper side predicted CF  = 14°, lower side predicted

18 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 18 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Results Comparison of  prescribed & predicted transition lines  = 10°, upper side predicted  = 14°, upper side predicted section of the hot films calibration point for N TS

19 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 19 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Results Comparison of  c p -distributions:  = 0.20, 0.38, 0.66, 0.88  = 14.0°

20 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 20 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Conclusion The complete coupled system (RANS solver & transition prediction module) was succesfully applied to a complex aircraft configuration of industrial relevance  WB with 3-element high-lift system The predicted transition lines are reasonable and quite different from estimated ones based on an experiment But, they are of preliminary character: Transition prediction module does not yet cover all transition mechanisms which can occur in 3d high-lift flows Transition inside laminar separation bubbles, attachment line transition & by-pass trasition can not be detected More validation on complex configurations necessary It seems to be evident that transition inside laminar separation bubbles is of high importance It was shown that a fully turbulent simulation or an estimation of the transition lines can result in significant deficiencies

21 Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 21 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Further comparisons for the current tast cases: Skin friction lines vs. flow visualizations Global coeffcients: lift & drag More validation cases, e.g. DLR F5 wing → transonic test case & other more complex test cases Empirical criteria for: - transition inside laminar separation bubbles - attachment line transition - bypass transition Incorporation of a fully automated linear stability code into the transition prediction module → alternative for database methods Consideration of relaminarization Acknowledgments:  Work carried out in EUROLIFT II project, partly funded by EU  Computational grid provided by Airbus Germany Outlook

Download ppt "Hyatt Regency, San Francisco, California > 06-June-06 Slide 1 > 24 th Applied Aerodynamics Conference > A. Krumbein Automatic Transition Prediction and."

Similar presentations

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoils and wings

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Airfoils and wings
Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench

Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
Boundary Layer Analyses

Boundary Layer Analyses
A Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on 3D Unstructured Meshes Dimitri J. Mavriplis Department of Mechanical Engineering University.

A Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on 3D Unstructured Meshes Dimitri J. Mavriplis Department of Mechanical Engineering University.
University of Southampton Southampton, UK

University of Southampton Southampton, UK
Andreas Krumbein > 30 January 2007 MIRACLE Final Meeting, ONERA Châtillon, Folie 1 Navier-Stokes High-Lift Airfoil Computations with Automatic Transition.

Andreas Krumbein > 30 January 2007 MIRACLE Final Meeting, ONERA Châtillon, Folie 1 Navier-Stokes High-Lift Airfoil Computations with Automatic Transition.
Transition locations on the LEISA high lift airfoil S.Reuß

Transition locations on the LEISA high lift airfoil S.Reuß
Analysis of CFD Methods in High Lift Configurations

Analysis of CFD Methods in High Lift Configurations
1 Pressure-based Solver for Incompressible and Compressible Flows with Cavitation Sunho Park 1, Shin Hyung Rhee 1, and Byeong Rog Shin 2 1 Seoul National.

1 Pressure-based Solver for Incompressible and Compressible Flows with Cavitation Sunho Park 1, Shin Hyung Rhee 1, and Byeong Rog Shin 2 1 Seoul National.
MAE 5130: VISCOUS FLOWS Introduction to Boundary Layers

MAE 5130: VISCOUS FLOWS Introduction to Boundary Layers
Adaptation Workshop > 21.06.2006 Folie 1 > TAU Adaptation on EC145 > Britta Schöning TAU Adaptation for EC145 Helicopter Fuselage Britta Schöning DLR –

Adaptation Workshop > Folie 1 > TAU Adaptation on EC145 > Britta Schöning TAU Adaptation for EC145 Helicopter Fuselage Britta Schöning DLR –
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module

Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
MAE 1202: AEROSPACE PRACTICUM Lecture 12: Swept Wings and Course Recap April 22, 2013 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.

MAE 1202: AEROSPACE PRACTICUM Lecture 12: Swept Wings and Course Recap April 22, 2013 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th 2007. Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,

1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
1 DLES, Ercoftac Workshop, Trieste, 8-10 September 2008 LES of turbulent flow through a heated rod bundle arranged in a triangular array. S. Rolfo, J C.

1 DLES, Ercoftac Workshop, Trieste, 8-10 September 2008 LES of turbulent flow through a heated rod bundle arranged in a triangular array. S. Rolfo, J C.
Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.

Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.

Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
Numerical study of the blade cooling effect generated by multiple jets issuing at different angles and speed into a compressible horizontal cross flow.

Numerical study of the blade cooling effect generated by multiple jets issuing at different angles and speed into a compressible horizontal cross flow.
Applications of Adjoint Methods for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University.

Applications of Adjoint Methods for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google