Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLorena Norton Modified over 9 years ago
1
E-PRTR dataflows and SEIS in the Netherlands Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Wim van der Maas
2
2 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Outline PRTR in the Netherlands Process and dataflow Three systems with useful experiences for SEIS 1.Integrated industrial reporting (e-AER) 2.Internal website with PRTR-partners 3.Aarhus implementation Lessons Learned Technology is not the issue, what are the issues? Standardisation, Version control, What is in it for us?
3
3 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Netherlands Pollutant Release & Transfer Register Since 1974 The national emissions to air, water and soil of 350 pollutants Two datasets per year (t-2 in March, t-1 in July) Formal approved by the partners: Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) Statistics Netherlands (CBS) Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO). On behalf of three Ministries Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) Transport, Public Works and Water Management (V&W) Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV)
4
4 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Overall coordination of the process (70 emission experts, 10 institutes) Infrastructure (websites, databases) Spatial allocation of the national emissions Report emissions to the Dutch government, EU, UNFCCC LCP, EPER/E-PRTR, NIR, IIR CLRTAP/NEC, WFD etc. One exception: Cap & trade emission reports (ETS) Report emissions to the public www.prtr.nl www.emissieregistratie.nl www.prtr.nlwww.emissieregistratie.nl emissieregistratie@pbl.nl emissieregistratie@pbl.nl Tasks of the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency:
5
5 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Emissions of 1000 point sources (IPPC facilities, eAER’s) 650 source categories with national totals and activity levels Divided into 55 work packages (Emission Experts) 5 Task Forces: Energy sector, industry, waste Agriculture Transport Water Consumers Data in the PRTR Diffuse sources Calculated individual sources IPPC-facilities (eAER)
6
6 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Dataflow PRTR Facilities Internal website All reports e-AER Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s
7
7 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Dataflow PRTR Facilities Internal website All reports Public website Embargo sheet e-AER 1 2 3
8
8 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Integrated industrial reporting (e-AER) 1 Since 1995 mandatory annual reporting by the industry Integration of 11 separate questionnaires 250 largest companies + 500 voluntary Questionnaire on paper of 100+ pages (fixed format) Increasing amount of themes air, water, waste, energy, noise, safety, soil... 250 (local) authorities for validation at least 7 copies on paper Digitised after validation into one database quality problems
9
9 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Integrated industrial reporting (e-AER) 1 An intelligent form (100+ screens) Many checks and balances Historical data also shown A central database with historical and actual data A web-site to: Give user support (additional helpdesk) Reporting of data (to spreadsheets) Reporting of status information Your password and ID implies the information shown and read or write permission
10
10 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Integrated industrial reporting (e-AER) 1 This months we will pass a new law to integrate E-PRTR with the other obligations: -Information on installations (LCP and to calculate national data) -On energy use (LCP, GHG) -15 pollutants with lower thresholds (< 90% coverage) -8 additional pollutants (TSP) -Combustion and process-emissions (GHG) -Biomass CO 2 And a tender to rebuild the e-AER to facilitate the integration of E-PRTR
11
11 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Dataflow PRTR Facilities Internal website All reports e-AER Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s Work package MDB’s
12
12 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Internal website with PRTR-partners 2 Only accessible by PRTR-partners (extranet) Down- en Uploads by the Emission Experts Version control Only the expert can upload it’s work package Many automated checks during uploads As many down- and uploads as wanted Automated logging of all uploads EmissionExplorer for overall checks After an upload every partner can check ‘the whole picture’ To compare with previous datasets To analyses trends
13
13 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Public website (Aarhus implementation) 3 To inform the public about emission-sources in their neighborhood (and, by doing so, increasing the involvement of the public in validation of emissions Bilingual Integration of point sources and diffuse emissions Integrated compartments (air, air IPCC, soil, water indirect and direct) Maps per emission source, 5*5 km grid, per community (municipalities), water catchment area etc. Emission Explorer, only one dataset, no activity data All methodologies used, detailed exports
14
14 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
15
15 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
16
16 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
17
17 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
18
18 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
19
19 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
20
20 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
21
21 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
22
22 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
23
23 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
24
24 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
25
25 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
26
26 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
27
27 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
28
28 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
29
29 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
30
30 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
31
31 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
32
32 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
33
33 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
34
34 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
35
35 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
36
36 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
37
37 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008
38
38 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 350 pollutants 650 source categories 1000 point sources 400 communities, thousands grid-cells ……. 100.000.000 emissions 50.000 emission maps 200 methodology reports Public website (Aarhus implementation) 3
39
39 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 350 pollutants 1250 source categories 1000 point sources 400 communities, thousands grid-cells ……. 100.000.000 emissions 50.000 emission maps 200 methodology reports Maximum transparency? Public website (Aarhus implementation) 3
40
40 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Technology is not the issue Store once use many Webservices / Central database Capacity PRTR 100,000,000 emissions Ipod Complete GIS Europe on street level
41
41 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 What are the issues? Standardisation
42
42 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Datamodel ER Spatial allocation Pollutant hierarchy National emissions Source Categorisation Waste Datasets Activity- data Compart- ments Work packages Reporting obligations Installations & stacks Facility emissions & activity levels Facilities Competent authorities
43
43 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 What are the issues? Standardisation Just finished a study to explain the CO 2 -differences between ETS, E-PRTR, NIR-CRF Version control (continuously updated!) Timing of the various obligations Process is dominated by the UNFCC GHG inventory What is in it for us? (to get people moving) Focus communication of SEIS Business to Government (no) Local Government to National Government (no) National Government to EU (yes) EU to the public (…)
44
44 E-PRTR and SEIS, Wim van der Maas, 2 Dec 2008 Concepts we benefited from The owner has control Central data-model No storage of redundant information Pro: consistency guaranteed Contra: storage at the lowest level Source categorisation Very strict version control Two datasets, always ‘JIT’, harmonise data Forbid the use of spreadsheets for data storage or as a reporting tool
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.