1. Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation cwardle@nsf.gov 703-292-4776

2. Caroline Wardle Education –B.Sc. Special in Mathematics, London University, England (1965 ) –Ph.D. in Mathematical Physics, London University, England (1970) Academic positions –Hunter College of the City University of New York (1969-1975) –Boston University (1975-1990) –Wang Institute of Graduate Studies (1980-1981) –Howard University (1997-1998) NSF positions –Senior Science Adviser for Education and IT Workforce in the Computer and Network Systems Division (2002 - present) –Deputy Division Director, Program Director: research, infrastructure and educational programs in CISE (1990-2002) Research Interests –Theoretical physics, computer graphics, programming languages, software engineering, information systems and computer ethics.

3. Federal Agency Funding Agencies, programs & program managers Kinds of funding Pro’s and con’s of collaboration Pro’s and con’s of interdisciplinary proposals; Do's and don'ts of successful proposal writing The review process

4. Proposal Writing DO’s Do identify the relevant program and talk to the appropriate program manager Do read the program announcement carefully and respond Do understand the rules and evaluation criteria of the agency Do present your ideas clearly and succinctly using correct English Do provide adequate explanation - reviewers are technical peers Do ask experienced investigator to critique your proposal Do keep within agency guidelines for proposal format Do read copies of successful proposals Do volunteer to be a reviewer

5. NSF’s Merit Review Criteria What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? … more… What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups? … more… Additional program-specific review criteria... NSF will return without review proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the Project Summary.

6. Proposal Writing DON’Ts Don’t submit an identical proposal to several programs Don’t miss proposal deadlines, NSF does not accept late submissions Don’t request unrealistic items in the budget Don’t exceed program budgetary guidelines Don’t wait until the last minute for institutional sign-off Don’t give up if your proposal is declined, examine the reviews and try once more

7. A good NSF proposal Responds to the program announcement Presents in a concise, scientific writing style : –What you are going to do –How you will do it –Why it is important –What is your unique contribution –The broader impact of your proposed work –A well-defined evaluation and assessment plan –What others are doing in this area –An appropriate and justified budget Includes letters indicating support or cooperation, if proposing other participants Shows how current proposal builds on past support, if relevant Responds to the reviewers' comments, if this is a re- submission