Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Intergovernmental Relationships PIA 2528. Some Oral Interview Questions: End of Semester 1. What major historical factors appear to have defined Governance,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Intergovernmental Relationships PIA 2528. Some Oral Interview Questions: End of Semester 1. What major historical factors appear to have defined Governance,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Intergovernmental Relationships PIA 2528

2 Some Oral Interview Questions: End of Semester 1. What major historical factors appear to have defined Governance, Local Government and Civil Society according to our "general reading.“ 2. What factors are unique and different for Africa, Middle East, Eastern Europe, Asia or Latin America? 3.To what extent is society and culture important at the "country" level? Be able to discuss at least one country in your region.

3 Theme The Nature of Intergovernmental Relationships

4 Overview: Historical Patterns of Relations  AT ISSUE - Location of ultimate power and Responsibility  Definition of Power:  The authoritative allocation of values  Balance: Leadership, Authority and Choice  WORLD WIDE HUMOR- VIDEO WORLD WIDE HUMOR

5 Hierarchy and Authority: Feudal and Now?

6 Symbolism, Power and Authority Leadership as Image

7 German Liberalism 1848

8 Authority

9 Authoritarian States

10 TYPES OF INTER-GOVERNMENTAL AND INTER- ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONS Confederation and loose con- federal relationships

11 The Articles of Confederation The Articles of Confederation, drafted in 1777 by the Continental Congress, served as the first Constitution of the United States.

12 Confederation Relationships Power lies with the sub-units  U.S. Articles of Confederation  Canadian Federation  European Union  Southern African Development Council  Economic Council of West African States  ASEAN  Mercusor

13

14 Federalism  Concept: Can Transfer additional authority back to the sub-units but not take power away from the federated governments (Provinces, states)  Principal: Divided Soveregnty

15 Governance as a cake

16 Federal Systems In Federal Relationship Some power lies with the National Unit Some power lies with lower units Layer Cake

17 German Intergovernmental Relations

18 Layers of Government Intertwined

19

20 Federal Powers  Unique or Exclusive Powers- Federal and State  Concurrent Powers- Federal and State  Devolved Powers- State and Local  Denied Authority

21 Federal Systems Key Distinction: 1. Lower units cannot break away from the National Unit 2. National Units cannot take power away from the lower units 3. Divided Sovereignty

22 Federalism: Examples: USA Canada Germany Nigeria India Russian Federation Austria Switzerland Malaysia

23 Fort Sumter

24 Federal Relationships TaxationIndian States

25 Unitary Systems and Sub-regional units 1. All power ultimately lies at the national level 2. What power the local level has, is given to it by the national level 3. The power that the national unit has given to the local level can also be taken away from it

26 Unitary Government

27

28 Unitary Systems- Examples  United Kingdom  France  Hungary  Kenya  Japan  South Africa? (Unitary or Quasi- Federal)  Bolivia  China?  Palestine?  Indonesia  Sweden

29 Indonesia

30 Unitary Systems

31 Subsidiarity: European Union Term  Subsidiarity is the idea that matters should be handled by the smallest (or, the lowest) competent government authority possible.  It is presently best known as a fundamental principle of European Union Law. According to this principle, the EU may only act (i.e. make laws) where member states agree that action of individual countries (or local governments) is insufficient.  Subsidiarity has become a principle of public sector reform in LDCs

32 Term Avoids the Concept of Democracy  South Africa

33 Subsidiarity: Reminder and Summary  Concept: Transfer of authority to a lower level of government  Primary Unit of Government: Lowest level that carries a bureaucracy with it  Alternative Social Service Delivery Systems Debated- eg. Health in USA

34 Models of Subsidiarity: Review  Devolution: Federal or Unitary (Political)  Deconcentration (Administrative)  Delegation (Special Unit- PAT)  Privatization (Contracting Out)  Program and Project Deconcentration: Principal Agency Issue)

35 Local Governance South African Elections, May, 2011 VIDEO

36 Coffee Break  Ten Minutes

37 Intergovernmental Relationships Basic Assumptions and Local Governance

38 Reiteration

39 Devolution  Transfer to a non-Federal political body e.g.Decision-Making Legal, Budget and personnel authority to district and town councils Key- power lies with lower level politicians

40 Thomas P. (Tip) O’Neil, Speaker of the U.S.House of Representatives 1977-1987

41 Street Level Issues- Costa Rica

42 Deconcentration: Transfer of authority to administrators at lower level within the administrative system

43

44 The Goal: Professionalism

45

46 Deconcentration: Review  Functional vs. Prefectoral  Prefectoral integrated  Prefectoral unintegrated

47 Control Systems: Review Home AffairsLocal Govt. Council Labor District Labor Office Education District Ed. Office Agriculture District Ag. Office Public Works Office Functional

48 Control Systems InteriorLocal Govt.Public WorksAgricultureEducationLabor Council/Chief Prefectoral - Integrated District Office District Labor Office District Ed. Office District Ag. Office Public Works Office

49 Control Systems: Review Local Govt. Council/ Chief Prefectoral - Unintegrated Police InteriorLabor District Labor Office Education District Ed. Office Agriculture District Ag. Office Public Works Office District Office

50 The Critical View

51 Delegation  Transfer of authority to a statutory body such as Public Corporations or parastatals (UK)  Eg. AMTRAK

52 Delegation  Transfer Function Outside of line Departments  Use of Board  Commercialization vs. Privatization

53 Public Enterprise Commercialization: In Theory

54 Delegation

55 Privatization  Transfer function out of government sector to the For Profit or Non-Profit Sector

56 “Russian Privatization and Silence of the Lambs”

57 Principles of Privatization  Key Conditionality- Privatization of the economy within a context of administrative Reform  Linked to Contracting Out

58 The View from the 1080s Redux

59 Principles of Privatization a. divestiture (full sale) b. contracting out c. liquidation d. sell off public private partnership shares

60 Waste Removal

61 Principles of Privatization Goal: Small government and return to the recurrent budgeting process and balanced budget principles of “Neo-Orthodox Economists”

62 The Image: Electrical Privatization in Brazil

63 Programs and Projects  Program and Project Deconcentration: (Principal Agency Issue)  Assymetric Relationships  Prone to Patron-Clientalism

64 President Chester A. Arthur and Patronage (1881-1885)

65 Principal Agency Syndrome: Asymmetric interests when a principal hires an agentprincipalagent

66 Program and Project Decentralization: 1. Sectoral - By regular line or agency within a Ministry E.g. Focused activity - seed production (Green Revolution) Agricultural experiments

67 Origins- Experiments in Mexico 1943 (Rockefeller Foundation)

68 Indian Department of Agriculture

69 Program and Project Decentralization: 2. Deconcentration or Devolution of authority to central level special unit eg. Transport, water, health or education projects to subordinate administrative or structures (Education Service) PAT (Port Authority Transport) Buses

70 Program and Project Decentralization:  3. Inter-Ministerial Committees or Units Planning supervision Overlapping memberships, e.g. Land Use Planning

71 Inter-ministerial Cooperation in Botswana (and Expatriates)

72 Land Use Plan, Berlin Germany

73 Program and Project Decentralization: 4.Creation of field level Special Project Units with semi- autonomous status ( Special designated geographical areas) Integrated Development Programs (Deliver Social and Economic Services)

74 Rural Socio- Economic Enhancement Scheme 2.1 Integrated Rural Development 2.2 Small Irrigation Schemes Development 2.3 Integrated Farming Systems Development 2.4 Revobue Multipurpose Dam 2.5 New Cash Crops Establishment 2.6 Livestock Development 2.7 Farmers' Associations Promotion 2.8 Grain Storage Development 2.9 District Water Supply 2.10 Rural Electrification 2.11 Mineral Resources Exploration

75 Program and Project Decentralization: Project Decent. E.g. A Range management project; or Integrated Rural Development - Most well known type of special project  Multitude of project activity in different sectors that may overlap or compliment.

76 Integrated Rural Development (IRD)

77 DISCUSSION ISSUES AND CONCERNS Democracy: Writers and Themes

78 Discussion: What Have You Been Reading? Discussion One: What is unique about each part of the world as seen from our authors? Discussion Two: Limited Government- What is it? Discussion Three: Command Economy?

79 VIDEO: Dictatorship Charlie Chaplin, “The Great Dictator” (1940)Dictatorship

80 Case Studies: Stereotypes and The Institutional Legacy- Geographical Themes and Myths  Africa: “Dark Continent,” Slavery, race and Europe:  Eastern Europe: Balkan Ghosts  Asia: Villagization and Collectivism and the Asian Model  Latin America: Iberian heritage (or US)- Marxism, the U.S. and Ideology  Middle East: Ottoman Legacy, Islam, Israel, vs. Europe

81 Regional Discussions: What are you finding out? 1. Democracy 1. Governance 2. Local Government 3. Civil Society 4. Institutional State


Download ppt "Intergovernmental Relationships PIA 2528. Some Oral Interview Questions: End of Semester 1. What major historical factors appear to have defined Governance,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google