1. Welcome to Vote on the Code 2015 The Process Begins!

2. Introduction and State of the CMAHC

3. CMAHC: WELCOMES, ADMINISTRATION, CONFERENCE FLOW, ORGANIZATION, WORKING GUIDANCE

4. CMAHC Vote on the Code 2015 Welcome!  Thanks to all of you who are taking the time to attend in- person or via Live Streaming  Thanks to NSPF for organizational and registration assistance  Tom Lachocki, Jocelyn Jester, Susan Wichmann, Alex Antoniou

5. CMAHC Vote on the Code 2015 Housekeeping  Turn off your ring tones  Restrooms are out door straight ahead on right  Emergency exits are in back of room to outside  Full agenda so no scheduled breaks  Take them when needed  Coffee, tea provided (thx to Aquatic Development Group)  Lunch on your own  Noon to 1pm each day, list of close proximity restaurants in registration packet  Bring food back to room for increased interaction

6. Thanks to Founding Sponsors

7. Thanks to Gold and Bronze Sponsors

8. LEADERSHIP

9. CMAHC, 2015 Board of Directors Michael Beach, President Jasen Kunz John Linn Colleen Maitoza Tony Mendez Tim Shay Tracynda Davis, Vice-President Scot Hunsaker, Treasurer Jim DunnBob Vincent, Secretary

10. Technical Review Committee Carl Nylander, Chair Counsilman-Hunsaker Paul Sisson, Vice Chair Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality  Gary Fraser, Washington State Department of Health (retired)  Ralph Kittler, Seresco Technologies, Inc.  Rich Martin, NSF International  Ellen Meyer, Lonza Group Ltd.  Katie Moore, Texas Department of State Health Services  Susan Painting, Monroe County Health Department, New York  Laura Suppes, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, WI

11. Other Staff to Help You  Julia Charles, CDC  Lawyer working on MAHC legislative tracking but will be on chat room and other logistics  Kelli Foster, CDC  Environmental Health by day but here to help on registration, note taking, general problem solver  Laina Curtiss, CDC  Not here and why are happy since it is because of her first baby being on the way!

12. Volunteers Needed!  Caucus facilitators  Three caucus sections with sectors. Still need several facilitators for most sectors. See Kelli Foster to help and get instructions. Numbers needed equals Public Health/Regulators (0) Manufacturers/Suppliers (1) Designers/Builders (3) Management/Staff (2)  Photographers  Please take pictures of how you feel the Conference should be highlighted and send to info@cmahc.orginfo@cmahc.org  Want to post a collage on the CMAHC website, post-conference

13. PROCESS FOR GATHERING, REVIEWING, MODIFYING, AND ACCEPTING FEEDBACK

14. CMAHC Process Input Soliciting ideas  CR submissions open to general public January 5 to February 19

15. CMAHC Process Input Change Request  159 CR submissions  TRC constituted  CR triaging to check submission criteria  All CRs and supporting materials posted for member viewing March 31  CRs open for member comment for 60 days

16. CMAHC Process Input Change Request Technical Review & Discussion  Technical review and comment from membership  CRs open for member comment for 60 days (July 6)  TRC reviews posted 9/17 - open access  CRs open for member comment until 10/23

17. CMAHC Process Input Change Request Technical Review & Discussion Conference Presentations  Gathering members to give them a voice  Present and discuss 62 CRs at conference  CRs open for member comment until 10/23

18. CMAHC Process Input Change Request Technical Review & Discussion Conference Presentations  Post-Conference comments close 10/23  Review, potential CR revision  Voting open 11/6 -12/6  Board review  Submission to CDC, release of voting results 1/14/2016  CDC releases revised MAHC 5/2016 CDC Board of Directors Voting

19. OPPORTUNITIES FOR INTERACTION AND FEEDBACK

20. Member Communication, Feedback, and Interaction  Working premise  Having a microphone for 2-3 people to speak in support or opposition to CR is not the best interaction Selects for those fastest and loudest  Want to broaden feedback to include as many people as possible Mimic as much as possible the MAHC development process with multiple rounds and modes of public comment  Note: Burden of feedback is on members to read and get involved

21. Overall Process: Member Communication, Feedback, and Interaction  CRs open for anyone to submit: received 159 CRs  CRs posted March 31, open for member comment until July 6 (~3 months) while TRC reviewing  Zero comments received  TRC reviews posted in September for member comment  Nine received by 9/30 deadline for conference use  Conference includes in-person and virtual interaction opportunities  Comments accepted for another 2 weeks after conference to allow time for reflection and suggested improvements  CRs still open for change  Voting starts 1 month after Conference; open for 1 month

22. Conference Opportunities: Communication, Feedback, and Interaction  Breakout caucus discussion with other sector members  Tuesday: 1-2pm, 7-9pm  Wednesday: 2-3 pm  On-live Live Stream-based chat room discussion projected for in-person attendees to see on screen (in-person and virtual)---will be monitored and presented  Microphone for attendees once posted and chat room feedback covered  In-person attendees can also submit written comments to front podium if desired (put your name on them please so we can clarify if needed)  Floor discussion Wednesday 3-4:15pm

23. Change Request (CR) Presentations  Presented by Section # in twelve 1-hour increments  If you don’t want to hear some take a break and network with colleagues  We will stick to time for each hour but may shift timing within the hour section presentation  Each section has ~ 4 CR presentations  May be grouped by theme, same MAHC section since they don’t need to be presented individually  Where submitter did not agree to TRC changes both suggestions are presented (for example 18/18A), you will vote on them separately

24. Change Request (CR) Presentations  Presentations  5 minutes CR (may be presented by submitter)  5 minutes TRC review  Move to next session CR until 4 CR presentations covered  Chat room comments monitored throughout presentations Projected on screen for in-house viewing Real time reviewing and summarizing of chat room comments  20 minutes at end of each section to present submitted/virtual comments to group and, once completed, open microphone for attendees  Strict time limits  62 CRs to cover; must keep on time to keep conference on time so all speakers will be cut off when time is completed

25. Change Request (CR) Presentations  Strict time limits  62 CRs to cover; we must keep to the time to keep conference on time so all speakers will be cut off when time is completed  The Emcee may be smiling in the picture but won’t be if you go over time! Scot Hunsaker, CMAHC Board Treasurer

26. Caucus Sessions After Each ½ Day Session  Split up by sector designation (you picked it if you became a member)  Have four rooms for separate discussion  Facilitator assigned to help flow of discussion  Discuss CRs covered, get pulse of your community, plan comments to be submitted post-conference, or what you want to discuss Public Health/Regulators: Federal, State, State Designee, Local Health Depts. Public Health/Regulators: Federal, State, State Designee, Local Health Depts. Management/Staff: Consumer, Consumer Protection, Aquatic Staff, Aquatic Management Management/Staff: Consumer, Consumer Protection, Aquatic Staff, Aquatic Management Designers/Builders: Aquatic Design, Aquatic Builder, Academia Designers/Builders: Aquatic Design, Aquatic Builder, Academia Manufacturers/Suppliers: Aquatic Manufacturer, Aquatic Supplier Manufacturers/Suppliers: Aquatic Manufacturer, Aquatic Supplier

27. Logistics: Live Streaming  We will be triaging Live Streaming messages  Right now, if you are on the Live Stream, please write an email with “Livestream attendance” in the subject box and tell us how many people are sitting in at your registered livestream site----we want an estimate of reach

28. Chat Room Comment and Discussion  In-person and Live Streaming attendees will use chat room function to send messages to group  Will project here in room for in-person attendees to see  Live Streamers can see on their computer  Sign-up instructions--Julia  As you are hearing presentations, send comments to group on your thoughts on  Pro, con, potential improvements Hold the yes/no comments for your vote as this is not meant to be a vote or straw poll

29. STATE OF THE CMAHC DOUG SACKETT, CMAHC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Driven By Your Expertise

30. Where Was the CMAHC 1 Year Ago in October 2014  MAHC 1 st Edition posted August 2014  CMAHC  Incorporated as 501(c)3 non-profit  Board of Directors in place  Executive Director just hired and announced  NSPF signed on as 1 st Founding Sponsor in early 2014  CMAHC organizational meeting held in Portland, OR in October, 2014

31. Where are We on Adoption of the MAHC?  Key consideration  States must review head to head and fit into regulatory or legislative process and timeframe so adoption can take 1-2 years CDC fecal incident response (small element): 21 states adopted in 1-2 years; all states in 5 years—small section FDA Food Code adoption sped up in years 3-6---entire model code  NACCHO endorsement  23 state and local jurisdictions comparing MAHC to existing code or moving ahead on potential adoption (eg., New Mexico, Indiana)  CDC has conducted four head-to-head comparisons to be made for key states

32. Sustainability: Membership and Sponsorship Growth  Membership  2014 Free: >300  2015 $20/yr: >300  Sponsorships  2014 1 Founding  2015 3 Founding, 3 Gold, 3 Bronze  Financial audits conducted and satisfactory

33. Research Agenda, Technical Consultations, and MAHC Interpretation  Research agenda  Started last October, refined and posted on CMAHC website  Technical and adoption consultations  Doug Sackett and CDC getting many calls  Need for more formalized and broader assistance  CDC efforts  Legislative and regulatory tracking system to track uptake and adoption of key MAHC elements  Building sentinel surveillance systems in 5 states (AZ, CA, FL, NY, TX) to track pool/spa inspection data  MAHC Implementation Support Network is being developed by NACCHO with CDC support  MAHC Inspector Training Program is being developed by NEHA with CDC support

34. Biennial Conference Process Development and Implementation  Adopted aggressive Biennial Conference timetable so MAHC is updated biennially starting in 2016  January/February: MAHC Change Requests solicited  159 Change Requests submitted  February-March  Technical Review Committee formation  April: Posted all CRs for member viewing and comment  April-June: TRC review  September: Post all TRC reviews  October: Plan and convene biennial conference

35. Ad Hoc Committees  Chlorinator sizing  Collecting data and analyzing  Altered original submission to make it performance based until more data are available  Will continue work after Conference  Indoor air handling  Met with ASHRAE  ASHRAE Multi-disciplinary Task Group Committee approved Chair, Keith Coursin, Desert Aire Corp.

36. Communications  Communication assistance  Name change  Interviews, media articles  E-blasts  Revised logo and message “Driven by Your Expertise” Tag line is at core of what this organization is about  External Presentations WAHC, NEHA, Women in Government, NCSL, NRPA, AHLA, APSP GA, AccuTab, IPSC, NSF, multiple Health Departments

37. Communications  Website  Revised look  Expanded content  Members only area Database for CRs, TRC reviews, member comments developed Voting module built into database for member use

38. Contact Information Doug Sackett Executive Director, CMAHC E-mail: info@cmahc.org Phone: 678-221-7218

39. MAHC More Information: Search on “CDC MAHC” or visit the Healthy Swimming MAHC Website: www.cdc.gov/mahc Email: mahc@cdc.govwww.cdc.gov/mahcmahc@cdc.gov CMAHC More Information: Search on “CMAHC” or visit the CMAHC Website: www.cmahc.org Email: info@cmahc.orgwww.cmahc.orginfo@cmahc.org