Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byQuentin Hunter Modified over 9 years ago
1
Towards parametrized GEC current sources for the CESM model FESD project meeting February 2014 Wiebke Deierling, Andreas Baumgaertner, Tina Kalb
2
Background Mach et al. 2011 Investigate parameterizations based on readily available cloud parameters in model such as: -In-Cloud Ice Water Path -Convection Mass Flux -……… Assumption: Cloud characteristics relate to conduction currents of different type Step 1: Investigate spatial and temporal distribution of these cloud parameters. How well do they represent observed cloud parameters? Step 2: Regression between estimated observed currents and cloud parameters to infer currents in model. This can be done on different temporal and spatial scales.
3
Storm counts from TRMM from Liu et al. 2009 Conversion of thunderstorm (TC) / electrified storm (T 30dbZ < -10/-17C) count to current per grid box: x 1.7A #TC over ocean x 1.0A #TC over land x 0.41A #ESC over ocean x 0.13A #ESC over land
4
CESM In-cloud ice water path above 500 hPa CESM Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa June Liu et al., 2009 estimated current
5
MERRA Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa CESM Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa June Liu et al., 2009 estimated current
6
Yearly average CESM Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa single-year mean (low resolution) Liu et al., 2009 estimated current
7
June composite day: loop through 0-23 UT CESM updraft mass flux above 800hPa, deviation from mean
8
Carnegie curve: Percent deviation from mean (June) Liu et al. 2009 current CESM % UT
9
Vertical location of charges Altitude above sea level (km) Positive charge at -30C Negative charge at -10C km from CESM temperature distribution
10
Conclusions and future work Convective updraft mass flux from CESM simulations has similar features to derived GEC source current from storm counts → possibly useful for parametrizing source current in the model Future work: o Derive relationships between storm counts and storm-current from ER-2 and radar o Compare results from different reanalysis (NCEP/NCAR, ECMWF) o Improve fitting of model variables to “observed” source current
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.