Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHoward Berry Modified over 9 years ago
1
myUMich Service Architecture Janus Project Brown Bag 1 June 2000
2
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 2 Overview Introductions Institutional messages & business goals – Linda Place User requirements study – Judy Dean Portal benchmark study – John Cady Service/information architecture – John Cady & BJ Streu
3
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 3 Institutional Messages Suspension of Belief “Publicness” Faculty Autonomy Transparent Administration Making Our History Visible
4
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 4 Principle of Suspension of Belief Creation of an environment that – Enables and supports intellectual and artistic creativity and exploration of alternative world views – Encourages risking identity loss and discourages rigid perspectives – Encourages exploration of complexity – Fosters compromise and accommodation across divergent viewpoints
5
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 5 Principle of “Publicness” Local community minded Commitment to eliminating socio-economic barriers to education Enabling an education that interacts with as many aspects of American life as possible
6
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 6 Principle of Faculty Autonomy Decentralization of decision making with respect to teaching and research Enable taking of personal responsibility Encourage personal engagement with work
7
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 7 Principle of Transparent Admin Keep bureaucracy invisible to faculty and students Enable creativity and exploration to happen without being obviously present Do not focus on production of goods and services but on enabling of academic processes
8
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 8 Principle of Visible History Take community member accomplishments seriously by keeping them visible
9
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 9 Business Goals Improved recruitment and retention Brand enhancement (national recognition) Development of lifelong relationships
10
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 10 First Target Audience Undergraduate students Potential students
11
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 11 User Requirements Overview Role and task modeling Student interactions and user testing “Best practices” research and benchmarking
12
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 12 Portal Benchmark Study Goal: see how to best handle portal structure Studied: – Top 10 Internet portals (as ranked by Traffick.com) – Two school-specific portals with guest views – Looked at college student portals; none worth study Focus: organization, navigation, and labeling
13
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 13 Positive Findings Found some strong examples to emulate Solid confirmation of the utility of the “containers” approach as the primary model of organization
14
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 14
15
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 15 Positive Findings, part 2 Also, great insights into customization options: – Add/remove modules – Customize within a module – Move content within columns – Etc. And into creating the customization process: – Strategies for easily moving content up or down in a column – How to give user feedback about changes
16
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 16 Pitfalls However, we also discovered some pitfalls Some sites supplemented container navigation with lists of menu items, navigation bars, etc. This caused a variety of problems: Pitfall #1:menu sprawl
17
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 17
18
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 18
19
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 19 Pitfalls #2: multiple navigation bars
20
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 20
21
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 21 Pitfalls (continued) #3: several levels of menus
22
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 22
23
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 23 Pitfalls #4: partial inclusion of options
24
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 24
25
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 25 Pitfalls #5: Duplication or near-duplication of links
26
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 26
27
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 27 Benchmark Summary Some good ideas Some lessons A state-of-the-art architecture is within our reach
28
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 28 Proposed Organizational Structure In a static Web site: design architecture + content simultaneously In interactive, fluid portal environment: design shell first, then architectures of services
29
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 29 Design Considerations Satisfy those fans of one all-in-one page and those who prefer several simpler pages Avoid the menu pitfalls we found in other portals Build a system that can accommodate services we haven't even thought of yet Keep things simple and efficient for the user How to:
30
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 30 An Answer Aha! Yahoo! Not a graphically pleasing site, but a very functional one Yahoo! architecture – Begin with single all-in-one page – Can add pages, choose content, and name them
31
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 31
32
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 32 Advantages of Yahoo! Approach Gives user control over the way s/he defines “simple” Relieves us of need to categorize menu items Relieves us of potential menu item politics User presented with only as much complexity as needed
33
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 33 Using the Yahoo! Method This model gives us the greatest flexibility and modularity of all the systems we’ve seen It has been tested and is proving popular – Yahoo! is by far the portal leader (see handouts) Our architecture will be more sophisticated and flexible than either MyUW or MyUCLA (and the latter has been in use since 1997)
34
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 34 Other Structural Notes Keep navigation to a minimum and prominent Build an intuitive and easy customization process Educate users re: customization benefits/ease Take care in designing default page; most users not expected to customize, at least at first
35
The Architecture
36
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 36
37
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 37
38
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 38
39
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 39
40
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 40
41
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 41
42
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 42
43
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 43
44
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 44
45
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 45
46
26 May 2000 myUMich Service Architecture 46
47
Contributing to Student Input Contact Linda Place lmp@umich.edu 615-5820
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.