Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPhilippa Heath Modified over 9 years ago
1
Suspension Peter Morabito Michael Paliga Brian Ross Drivetrain Kenny Elliot Patrick Mooney Dylan Quinn Frame Dan D’Amico Curtis May Greg Schafran
2
To design a vehicle for the SAE Baja Competition
5
[Veh. wt]*[Sin(incline angle)] = Repelling Weight [650 lbs]*[Sin(40 degrees)] = 418 lbs Rep wt = (tire rad)*(CVT ratio)*(engine tq)*(X min) 418 lbs = (1.0 ft)*(3.85)*(14 lb-ft)*(X min) ----->Xmin= 7.7551 Gear Ratio Calculations
6
Stage 1 - 2.0:1 Size: 20/40 teeth Pitch: 12 Face Width: 1.0 in Stage 2 - 4.0:1 Size: 20/80 teeth Pitch: 12 Face Width: 1.5 in 6.5 inch diameter output gear allows room for differential mounting to increase vehicle handling.
9
Front Suspension Basic Double A-arm setup Same overall design as previous years car No significant changes, just modifying to fit newly designed frame Rear Suspension Using a rear trailing arm set up similar to the 2012 car Eliminating the dynamic toe aspect, but maintaining the dynamic camber Improving wheel travel and reliability
10
ASSEMBLYFRONT REAR
11
Steering wheel angle vs. steering angle (front left) Motion is of a body roll
12
Camber angle (rear right) Motion is of a body roll
13
Camber Angle (rear right) Motion is of a jump
14
Camber angle (front right) Motion is of a jump
15
FEA - Stress FEA - Displacement TRAILING ARM 1’’ X 0.065’’ 4130 STEEL
16
UPPER A-ARM FEA - Stress FEA - Displacement 1’’ X 0.065’’ 4130 STEEL
17
LOWER A-ARM FEA - Stress FEA - Displacement 1’’ X 0.065’’ 4130 STEEL
18
Fox Float Racing Shocks: Adjustable air spring, velocity damping control, and light weight. Reduced Cost - $521.25 per pair versus $859 per pair for Custom Works Shocks. Comparable performance
19
Frame- Methods SAE standards SAE standards Firewall Firewall Front end Front end Roll cage Roll cage Rear end Rear end Finite Element Analysis Finite Element Analysis
20
The 2012 ODU Mini Baja (55 th place) weighed 479 pounds The 2012 ODU Mini Baja (55 th place) weighed 479 pounds Cornell’s car (3 rd place) weighed only 306 pounds Cornell’s car (3 rd place) weighed only 306 pounds Reduce frame size and weight Reduce frame size and weight Eliminate redundant members Eliminate redundant members Frame- Analysis
21
Material-4130 steel tubing: primary members: 1.25”x.065 secondary members: 1”x.065 Shorter overall length Lighter than previous ODU cars: 63.7 lbs. Frame- Results
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.