Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Outline 1.Gender and intersectional intersectional inequalities 2.New flagship initiative on gender statistics to support localization and monitoring.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Outline 1.Gender and intersectional intersectional inequalities 2.New flagship initiative on gender statistics to support localization and monitoring."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Outline 1.Gender and intersectional intersectional inequalities 2.New flagship initiative on gender statistics to support localization and monitoring of SDGs – opportunities for addressing disability

3 Strong content on GEWE in 2030 agenda Realizing gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls will make a crucial contribution to progress (2030 Agenda Declaration) Goal 5 “Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls”: Six Outcome and three MOI targets – many TGs addressing a multiple set of gender equality concerns (e.g. 5.1; 5.2, 5.3, 5.a, 5.c) Gender sensitive TGs in many other goals: >25% of TGs. (21 mention ‘women, men, girls, boys or gender equality’ and 16 refer to ‘universal’ or access for ‘all’) No one left behind: need to disaggregate by ‘ income, sex, age, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location and other characteristics relevant in national contexts ’ (TG 19.18; para 74.g)

4 Monitoring of GEWE in SDGs: Significant developments and many (new) tools Many new tools to draw from, including: Minimum set of gender indicators (52 Outcome + 11 Norms indicators) adopted by UNSC in 2013 + adaptations in most regions Core set of 9 VAW indicators (UNSC 2009, 2011, 2013) Technical resources: guidelines on gender statistics (UNECE/WB, UNSD); VAW data (UNSD); census (UNFPA); Gender data navigator (WB); gender and STEM (UNESCO) etc. Various collaboration forums, coordination mechanisms and partnerships, (IAEG-GS, EDGE, DATA2X etc.)

5 But many existing and new challenges for statistics Issues covered go beyond minimum set e.g. measuring discrimination: Indicator about results, not means; but need one priority indicator; avoid composite indices, perception indicators etc. – no credible alternative yet MOI targets: indicators to be universally relevant; avoid measuring inputs Going beyond sex disaggregation: disaggregate also for marginalized groups, people with disabilities, migrants, etc. but with finite sample sizes. Gender and environment – brand new issues to think about such as gender and climate change (e.g. TG 13b) Doing justice to it all with a limited number of indicators (multipurpose indicators)

6 Experience of UN-Women in TST and IAEG- SDGs to date: Goal 5 During Open Working Group negotiations, UN-Women, UNFPA and OHCHR led TST Gender cluster (later SDG 5) Within UN System, including recent exercise by UN Chief Statisticians, UN Women coordinated inputs for Goal 5 Precedent of collaboration within IAEG-GS, so broad agreement among contributing agencies (i.e. FAO, ITU, OHCHR, UNICEF, UNESCO, UNODC, UNFPA and UN Women) Intensive consultation with civil society organizations, including monthly meetings, so broadly aligned Comments by member states vary: Most are supportive and more ambitious but some have also questions about the choice of indicators

7 Indicators for Goal 5 (and reactions to them) (1) Indicators for which there is broad enough agreement Targe t Suggested indicatorData sourceMonitoring agencyTier Possible disaggregation SexAgeLoc.Inc. Other * 5.2 Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls aged 15+ subjected to physical, sexual and psychological violence by a current or former intimate partner, in the last 12 months, by form of violence and age DHS + VAW surveysUN-Women, UNICEF, UNSDII √√√√ 5.2 Proportion of women and girls aged 15+ subjected to sexual violence by persons other than an intimate partner, since age 15, by age and place of occurrence DHS + VAW surveysUN-Women, UNICEF and UNSDII √√√√ 5.3 Percentage of women aged 20-24 who were married or in a union before age 15 and age 18 (i.e., child marriage) DHS and MICSUNICEF and UNFPAI √√√ 5.3 Percentage of girls and women aged 15-49 years who have undergone FGM/C, disaggregated by age group, with a particular focus on ages 15-19 DHS and MICSUNICEF and UNFPAI √√√√ 5.4 Average weekly hours spent on unpaid domestic and care work, by sex, age and location (for individuals 5 years and above)** Time-use surveysUN-Women and UNSDII√√√√√

8 Indicators for Goal 5 (and reactions to them) (2) Indicators for which there is agreement but some questions remain 12Suggested indicatorData sourceMonitoring agencyTier Possible disaggregation SexAgeLoc.Inc. Other * 5.6 Proportion of women (aged 15-49) who make their own sexual and reproductive decisions DHS and MICS***UNFPAII √√√√ 5.b Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone, by sex Household surveysITUII√√√√√ Indicators for which countries have raised serious concerns about methodological clarity, areas of law covered, or type of indicator 5.1 Number (%) of countries with legal frameworks that promote gender equality and non-discrimination against all women and girls CEDAWCEDAW, UN-Women, OHCHRIII 5.6 Proportion of countries with laws and regulations that guarantee all women and adolescents access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, information and education Country reportsUNFPAII

9 Indicators for Goal 5 (and reactions to them) (3) Indicators that were added/changed following comments TargetSuggested indicatorData sourceMonitoring agencyTier Possible disaggregation SexAgeLocInc Other * 5.2 Proportion of girls and women (aged 15-19 and 20-24) who were subjected to sexual violence before age 15 by any persons DHS + VAW surveysUN-Women, UNICEF and UNSDII √√√ 5.2 Number of detected and non-detected victims of human trafficking per 100,000; by sex, age and form of exploitation Administrative data from law enforcement institutions/Field studies UNODCII√√√ 5.4 Average weekly time spent in water collection (including waiting time at public supply points), by sex, age and location Household surveysUN-Women and UNICEFIII√√√√√ 5.4 Proportion of pre-school children who are in early childhood care and education (ECCE) programmes Household surveysUNICEFIII√√√√√ 5.5 Proportion of women in leadership positions in political, economic and public life, by level and by type (leadership positions include the executive (Heads of State and Governments, ministers and local governments), legislative (national parliaments), judiciary and law enforcement (judges and police officers), and managers in public and private sector entreprises) Administrative + household surveys IPU, UN-Women, UNODC, UCLG and ILO I 5.5Share of female researchers, by seniority levelAdministrativeUNESCOI √ 5.a (a) Percentage of people with secure rights over agricultural land (out of total agricultural workers), by sex; and (b) Percentage share of women among owners or rights- bearers of agricultural land” by type of tenure Agricultural census and surveys FAO, UNSD, UN-WomenIII √√√√ 5.c Expenditure on gender equality policies as a percentage of total government expenditures Administrative sourcesUN-WomenIII

10 Monitoring GEWE in other goals – Limited traction beyond sex disaggregation Limited traction when list of indicators limited to one priority indicator per issue, unless target is specifically about gender (e.g. MMR, SRH, equal pay) At best sex-disaggregation, but little by way of prioritizing indicators that address other important gender concerns e.g. TG 3.9 addresses air pollution, but no traction for indoor air pollution e.g. Indic proposed for TG 4.2 measures 5 year-old children ‘developmentally on track’ but participation in childcare unaddressed e.g. Indic for TG 11.7 measures built up areas of cities, but completely leave safety aspect unaddressed (e.g. physical and sexual harassment against women and girls) Issues that are part of targets but are simply ignored: e.g. TG 4.7

11 Back to process: Still many unknowns What happens now that open consultation phase is over? Lots of inputs and differences to reconcile before 2 nd IAEG-SDGs? Discussions happening at regional level, sometimes led by Regional Commissions – links to the current IAEG process? If priority criterion is kept, what to do with non-priority indicators? (keep them for expanded set of thematic indicators?) How to ensure no one left behind but avoid ‘disaggregation fatigue’  important role for thematic monitoring?

12 Better production and use of gender statistics for evidence-based localization of the SDGs Ambitious new flagship programme initiative from UN Women: 3 objectives: Address weak policy space and legal and financial environment to produce gender statistics at national level Address technical challenges within National statistical systems that limit the production of gender statistics Address lack of access to data and limited capacity on the part of policymakers and other users to analyse them to inform policies Opportunities for collaboration

13 1.Supportive policy environment in place to ensure gender-responsive localization and effective monitoring of the SDGs Outputs 1.1. An assessment of gender statistics and identification of gaps is conducted at the national level 1.2. Enabling legal frameworks, institutional arrangements, and adequate resources for gender statistics are in place 1.3. National plans to localize gender-related SDGs targets and indicators are developed

14 2. Quality, comparable and regular gender statistics are available to address national data gaps and meet policy and reporting commitments under the SDGs, CEDAW and Beijing Output 2.1. Capacity of the national statistical system (NSS) strengthened to compile Tier I indicators in the minimum set and SDGs 2.2. Capacity of the NSS strengthened to collect Tier II indicators in the minimum set and SDGs 2.3. Capacity of the NSS strengthened to produce Tier III indicators in the minimum set and SDGs

15 3. Gender statistics are accessible to all users (including governments, civil society, academia and private sector) and can be analysed to inform research, advocacy, policies and programmes, and promote accountability Outputs 3.1. Increased dissemination of data at national, regional and global levels 3.2. User-producer dialogues institutionalized to increase accessibility, quality and demand for gender statistics 3.3. Capacity of civil society, government and other actors to use and analyse and use gender statistics to inform decision-making is strengthened


Download ppt "Outline 1.Gender and intersectional intersectional inequalities 2.New flagship initiative on gender statistics to support localization and monitoring."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google