Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byProsper Chambers Modified over 9 years ago
1
Keith Murphy Supervisor: Dr Caspar Ryan RMIT University – Distributed Systems and Networking Melbourne, AUSTRALIA Keith Murphy1
2
Power Preservation Metrics Adaptation Algorithm Implementation ◦ Distributed Frameworks ◦ MobJeX Empirical Evaluation Expected Results Conclusion Keith Murphy2
3
Why is it important? ◦ Mobile devices ◦ Useability ◦ More Advanced Applications What has already been done? ◦ Hardware monitoring of power. ◦ Client – Server offloading. ◦ Adaptation – Hardware and Software. What Research is being Proposed? ◦ Adaptation Algorithm for Distributed Frameworks. Keith Murphy3
4
Adaptation via transparent object migration within dynamic distributed networks. ◦ useful for power preservation JavaParty, Voyager, FarGo MobJeX Keith Murphy4
5
What sort of metrics? ◦ Metrics that have direct correlation to power usage. Identified Metrics: ◦ Processor Utilisation ◦ Network Utilisation ◦ Memory Utilisation ◦ Battery Status ◦ Direct versus Indirect measures (watts per unit). Keith Murphy5
6
Two Algorithms Weighting algorithm that has been previously empirically evaluated in work by Pablo & Ryan. An algorithm currently under development by Abebe & Ryan. What is planned ◦ Modify ◦ Add new metrics Keith Murphy6
7
Designed to minimise the development effort. Provides a middleware that detects changes within its environment via the collection of metrics. automatically triggers the adaptation of applications via object migration using adaptation algorithms. Different to the other frameworks where object migration is either predetermined or controlled by an administrator or scripts. Predefined Metric collection and Adaptation Sub-systems. Keith Murphy7
8
Initial Simulation Scenario ◦ Used to calibrate ◦ Comparing the following Pablo & Ryan’s algorithm versus our enhanced power preservation version. Abebe & Ryan’s algorithm versus our enhanced power preservation version. Enhanced Pablo & Ryan’s algorithm versus Enhanced Abebe & Ryan’s. ◦ Testing: Different Resource Utilisation Empirical Evaluation Scenario’s ◦ Designed to Verify results from the simulations. Keith Murphy8
9
Power used whilst the algorithm completes a task will be measured. The difference between the original and our enhanced power preservation version of it, will determine how much power has been saved. This information will be graphed and an estimation of extended battery life of a said device will be made. Keith Murphy9
10
We expect see power being preserved It will vary depending on the scenario It is to early to estimate the power preserved Keith Murphy10
11
Feasible At This Stage Future Work Questions? Keith Murphy11
12
Keith Murphy12
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.