Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDelilah Hicks Modified over 9 years ago
1
VBWG In-hospital course of stroke patients with vs without AF Steger C et al. Eur Heart J. 2004;6:in press. More severe stroke on admission Lower Barthel Index Higher proportion with Rankin Scale score (%) Higher rate of medical complications Pneumonia (%) Pulmonary edema (%) Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (%) Mortality (%) Poorer neurological status at discharge Lower Barthel Index Higher Rankin Scale score P < 0.0004 for all comparisons With AFWithout AF 15 52 40 31 23 12 8 25 9 6 2 14 60 4 85 2
2
VBWG Detection of AF after acute stroke/TIA Jabaudon D et al. Stroke. 2004;35:1647-51.ELR = 2-lead event-loop recording device N = 149Stroke/TIA ECG No Yes 4 (2.7%) 6 (4.1%) 7 (4.9%) 5 (5.7%) n = 88/132 7-day ELR n = 145 Additional ECG n = 13924-hr Holter No Yes AF? No. AF detected Yes AF? No AF?
3
VBWG Risk of AF by duration of heart rhythm Jabaudon D et al. Stroke. 2004;35:1647-51. Monitoring time (hours) AF risk (%) ECG HolterELR
4
VBWG Recurrence of AF 13 months post-stroke/TIA Jabaudon D et al. Stroke. 2004;35:1647-51.ELR = 2-lead event-loop recording device 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ECG or 24-hr Holter7-day ELR AF recurrence (%)
5
VBWG Clinical challenge: Addressing the rising burden of AF and stroke Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Circulation. 2004;110:1042-6. AHA. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2004 Update. Jabaudon D et al. Stroke. 2004;35:1647-51. AF continues to present an enormous public health problem – Men and women >40 yrs have lifetime risk for AF of ~1 in 4 – Estimated 2.2 million Americans – May account for up to 140,000 strokes yearly ECG and 24-hr Holter monitoring do not identify all stroke/TIA patients with AF Many AF patients are not receiving anticoagulant therapy to prevent recurrent stroke
6
VBWG Role of anticoagulant therapy in secondary prevention of stroke AF should be strongly suspected in all patients with acute stroke/TIA or TIA – All stroke/TIA patients with confirmed AF should receive anticoagulant therapy Warfarin – Pro: Proven effective – Con: Need for frequent (and costly) monitoring and dose adjustment New anticoagulants that offer fixed dosing with no monitoring are under investigation and may address warfarin’s shortcomings – Oral (direct thrombin inhibitors, ie, ximelagatran) – Parenteral (low–molecular-weight heparins, factor Xa inhibitors)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.