1. Miruna Badescu Eau de Web Biodiversity Action Plans data reporting and publishing

2. 2 BAP reporting on 2008 and 2010  Data and information collected by the countries and aggregated by the Commission  Final reporting made in PDF format  Difficult to extract reported data and information because of the lack of structure  Manual work needed into compare different actions and targets per country  Manual work needed in reusing (parts of) the information into aggregated reports

3. 3 BAP reporting in Reportnet Lack of structured delivery formats does not allow automatic conversion to other formats or automatic quality assessment

4. 4 Publishing process  Reported data was copied from the PDF files and pasted into a relational database  Long and fully manual process  Issues occurred during transformation: different encodings, text formatting, special characters  Initially - MS Access database build for the construction of the EU Community Report  Data migrated into MySQL, for the presentation on the BISE portal  Several rounds of manual checking were necessary

5. 5 EU BAP report 2010 into BISE (1) Data available per country:  Objectives  Targets  Actions  Measures of Progress

6. 6 EU BAP report 2010 into BISE (2) Comparison of data for multiple countries, and with the Community Report

7. 7 EU BAP report 2010 into BISE (3) The Community Report is aggregated by the Commission and lists for each Objective, Target and Action: -Community actions -Progress since the last reporting (2008)

8. 8 Conclusions and recommendations  Reportnet deliveries should be made in structured format  XML, RDF  Excel  Relational database  The SOER approach (SEIS) makes the further checking and integration of BAP data easier and will less errors  It should be possible to aggregate future deliveries into the BISE easier  It should be easy for other applications to grab and reuse the BAP data