Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Plane Strain Extrusion – Slip-line Field Solution vs. FEM Solution

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Plane Strain Extrusion – Slip-line Field Solution vs. FEM Solution"— Presentation transcript:

1 Plane Strain Extrusion – Slip-line Field Solution vs. FEM Solution
Nanshu Lu ES 246 Plasticity Project Jan. 11, 2006

2 Outline Metal Forming – Extrusion Slip-line Field Solution
Unsymmetrical Extrusion FEM Solution Conclusions

3 Metal Forming – Extrusion
Extrusion: Metal forming process whereby the workpiece is placed in a chamber with an opening and is forced to escape through the opening, usually being pushed out by a mandrel. Extrusion (a) and an assortment of extrudates (b) Metal Forming, Betzalel Avitzur, Lehigh University

4 Slip-line Field Solution
Hill R. (1948) A B C D E F G x2 x1 H Fan CAD

5 Unsymmetrical Extrusion
Green A.P. (1955) Fractional Reduction Eccentricity

6 Unsymmetrical Extrusion
Rough container walls Smooth container walls

7 FEM Solution – Modeling Skills
Part: Billet – 2D deformable shell Ram – 2D analytical rigid body Property Material – steel Elastic – 2000GPa, v=0.3 Plastic – Yield Stress = 400MPa, perfectly plastic Material Orientation – local coordinate system Assembly Billet – punch contact

8 FEM Solution – Modeling Skills
Step “Move ram” after initial step Maximum number of increments = 1000 Initial Increment = Minimum time increment = 1e-6 Nonlinear geometry Output request History output – reaction force on the ram reference point DOF monitor – monitor the horizontal displacement of the ram reference point

9 FEM Solution – Modeling Skills
Interaction Frictionless surface-to-surface contact between billet and the ram at initial step Load Boundary Condition Symmetric boundary condition Displacement constraints Imposed displacement to the ram (=0.05m)

10 FEM Solution – Modeling Skills
Mesh Structured CPE4R elements Global seed size 0.002m Job Monitor

11 FEM Solution – Deformed Shape

12 FEM Solution – Animation

13 FEM Solution – Reaction Force History

14 FEM Solution – P~H Relation
H (m) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 P/k 0.0000 0.6187 1.2373 1.8560 2.4747 3.0933 Pmax (N) 75.6 154.2 217.9 308.4 377.5 Cal-P/k 0.6547 1.3354 1.8871 2.6708 3.2692 r=0.5,

15 FEM Solution – P~k Relation
σy (MPa) 360 380 400 420 440 P/(2H) (MPa) 321.6 339.4 357.3 375.2 393.0 Pmax (N) 68.8 72.2 75.6 78.9 82.2 Cal-P/(2H) 344 361 378 394.5 411 H=0.2m

16 FEM Solution – Unsymmetrical Extrusion
ε 0.2 0.4 0.6 Δp/k 0.0000 0.0300 0.1300 0.2950 P (N) 204.8 206.6 211.3 218.6 Cal- Δp/k 0.0390 0.1407 0.2988 r=0.8

17 Conclusion Slip-line field method gives good solutions for metal-forming process ABAQUS/CAE v6.5 is able to calculate perfectly-plastic material Adaptive meshing is needed to simulate metal-forming process accurately Thermal contact interaction should be included further

18 Acknowledgement Thank You ^_^ Joost Vlassak Jennifer Furstenau
Xuanhe Zhao Thank You ^_^


Download ppt "Plane Strain Extrusion – Slip-line Field Solution vs. FEM Solution"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google