Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Intrapersonal Theories of Health Behavior n Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. n David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA n July 16, 2003, 8:30-10:15am n

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Intrapersonal Theories of Health Behavior n Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. n David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA n July 16, 2003, 8:30-10:15am n"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 1 Intrapersonal Theories of Health Behavior n Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. n David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA n July 16, 2003, 8:30-10:15am n hays@rand.org hays@rand.org n http://www.gim.med.ucla.edu/FacultyPages/Hays/

3 2 Today’s Question n Why do people behave in health- compromising ways? “Theory needs questioners more than loyal followers” (Rimer, 2002, p. 156).

4 3 Why do people... n do things that are bad for their health such as smoke cigarettes or drink too much alcohol? n not do things that are health- enhancing like exercise or eating low fat foods? n not do things that maximize the likelihood of better outcomes such as wearing seat belts?

5 4 Why do people…? n smoke cigarettes? n drink too much alcohol? n overeat? n fail to follow their doctor’s recommendations? -->Break into groups 

6 5 Transtheoretical Model n Stages of Change u “Ordered categories along a continuum of motivational readiness to change a problem behavior” http://www.uri.edu/research/cprc/transtheoretical.htm

7 6 Five Stages of Change n Precontemplation n Contemplation n Preparation* n Action n Maintenance

8 7 Precontemplation n No intention to change behavior in the foreseeable future (next 6 months). n Includes people who are unaware of the problem plus those who know about the problem but are not considering change. n “I am not thinking about changing my risky sexual behavior within the next 6 months to reduce the risk of getting HIV.”

9 8 Contemplation n People are aware that a problem exists and are seriously thinking about overcoming it but have not yet made a firm commitment to take action. n Intending to change within 6 months; open to feedback and information about how to change. However, ambivalent about the costs and benefits of their behavior. n “I am thinking about changing my risky sexual behavior within the next 6 months to reduce the risk of getting HIV.”

10 9 Preparation* n Individual is intending to take action in the next month and has unsuccessfully taken action in the past year (combines intention and behavior criteria). n Actively planning change and already taking some steps toward action such as reducing frequency of problem behavior. n “I am thinking about changing my risky sexual behavior within the next 30 days to reduce the risk of getting HIV.”

11 10 Action n Stage in which individuals modify their behavior, experiences, or environment in order to overcome their problems. Involves overt behavioral changes and requires commitment of time and energy. n e.g., cessation of smoking has occurred and last cigarette was less than 6 months ago. n “In the last few months I have changed my risky sexual behavior to reduce the risk of getting HIV.”

12 11 Maintenance n People work to prevent relapse and consolidate the gains attained during action. n Sustaining change and resisting temptation to relapse. n Stage extends from 6 months and beyond the initial behavioral change. n “For more than 6 months I have changed my (former) risky sexual behavior to reduce the risk of getting HIV.”

13 12 Decisional Balance n Pros and cons combine to form a balance sheet of comparative potential gains and losses. n Balance varies by stage of change.

14 13 Self Efficacy n Perceived ability to perform a task. n Self efficacy predicts future behavior if there are adequate incentives and skills.

15 14 Processes of Change n How shifts in behavior occur u Consciousness raising u Counter-conditioning u Dramatic relief u Environmental reevaluation u Helping relationships u Reinforcement management u Self-liberation u Self-reevaluation u Social liberation u Stimulus control

16 15 Precaution Adoption Process Model n Stage 1: Unaware of issue n Stage 2: Unengaged by issue n Stage 3: Deciding about acting n Stage 4: Decided not to act n Stage 5: Decided to act n Stage 6: Acting n Stage 7: Maintenance http://www.psandman.com/

17 16 Precaution Adoption Process Model n Do you know what it means to floss your teeth? u No -> {stage 1} u Yes -> {go to next q} n Do you floss your teeth now? u Yes -> {Stage 6 or 7} u No -> {go to next q} n Which of the following best describes you? u I’ve never thought about flossing. {Stage 2} u I’m undecided about flossing. {Stage 3} u I’ve decided I don’t want to floss. {Stage 4} u I’ve decided I do want to floss. {Stage 5}

18 17 Health Belief Model n Susceptibility n Severity n Costs/Benefits n Cues/Motivation n Barriers

19 18 Susceptibility n How likely one thinks a bad outcome (e.g., get sick or a disease) is if behavior persists (doesn’t change).

20 19 Severity n The consequence is perceived to be severe as opposed to mild.

21 20 Benefits of Behavior n The alternative behavior will reduce the likelihood of the negative consequence (e.g., disease). & n Benefits are perceived to outweigh costs.

22 21 Motivational cues n Cues (internal or external) that help convert intentions into behavior

23 22 Barriers n There are not significant psychological, financial, or other costs or barriers to engaging in the behavior.

24 23 Jane is not likely to continue smoking because… n She thinks that she might get lung cancer if she continues to smoke (susceptibility). n She believes that dying from lung cancer is terrible (severity). n Jane does not find smoking to be very pleasurable (cost/benefits). n Her friends are supportive of her quitting (absence of barrier)

25 24 Jon is likely to continue smoking because n He agrees with the tobacco industry-- smoking doesn’t cause lung cancer (susceptibility). n He believes that dying from lung cancer is not any worse than any other way of dying (severity). n Jon feels that smoking relaxes him (cost/benefits). n His friends offer him cigarettes (barrier to quitting)

26 25 Theory of Reasoned Action n Intentions n Attitudes u Beliefs (outcome expectancies) u Values n Subjective Norms u Beliefs (about what others think you should do) u Motivation to comply

27 26 Intentions n “Barring unforeseen events, a person will usually act in accordance with his or her intentions” (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980, p. 5).

28 27 Attitudes n One’s positive or negative evaluation of performing a behavior u Beliefs: about the consequences of performing the behavior (outcome expectancies) u Values: appraisal (importance) of the consequences

29 28 Subjective Norms n One’s perception of the social pressures to perform or not perform a behavior. u Beliefs: about whether specific individuals or groups think one should perform the behavior. u Motivation to comply with these people.

30 29 Someone likely to drink and drive n ATTITUDE: Bob feels more at ease with others when he drinks (beliefs about the consequences and values) n SUBJ NORM: Bob feels that his colleagues encourage him to drink after work (belief) and he wants them to like him (motivation to comply) n INTENTION: Bob intends (expects) to drink with his colleagues after work and then drive home 1 or more times in the next 30 days (intentions).

31 30 Theory of Planned Behavior n Past Behavior n Perceived Behavioral Control/Locus of Control/Self- Efficacy

32 31 Past Behavior n Always the best predictor of future behavior.

33 32 Behavioral Control n Intention -> Behavior u Link is problematic when behavior is not fully under the individual’s control.

34 33 Differential Association- Reinforcement Theory n Differential association with peers, family, school, work, church groups shape behavior n Imitation of Models n Differential Reinforcement n Exposure and Adoption of Evaluative Definitions n Behavioral Consequences

35 34 Imitation of Models n We learn behavior by watching and imitating other people.

36 35 Differential Reinforcement n Positive reinforcement (rewards) n Negative reinforcement (avoidance of something bad) n Positive punishment (aversive stimuli) n Negative punishment (loss of reward) u Positive (present something) u Negative (take something away) u Reinforcement (behavior increases) u Punishment (behavior decreases)

37 36 Exposure and Adoption of Evaluative Definitions n The more an individual defines a behavior as good or at least justified rather than bad, the more likely they are to engage in it. u Evaluative definitions F positive, neutral, negative F norms, attitudes, orientations

38 37 Behavioral Consequences n What happened after the behavior was performed?

39 38 Jerry is likely to overeat n Jerry’s parents are big eaters (imitation of models) n Jerry’s family serves big meal portions and encourages him to “clean your plate or you won’t get dessert” (negative reinforcement) n Jerry feels that thin people are unhealthy (evaluative definitions). n Jerry’s family praises him for finishing his meals (behavioral consequences).

40 39 Concluding Thoughts

41 40 This class was supported in part by the UCLA/DREW Project EXPORT, National Institutes of Health, National Center on Minority Health & Health Disparities, (P20-MD00148-01) and the UCLA Center for Health Improvement in Minority Elders / Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Aging, (AG-02-004).


Download ppt "1 Intrapersonal Theories of Health Behavior n Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. n David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA n July 16, 2003, 8:30-10:15am n"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google