Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: REVITALIZING THE TRADITION

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: REVITALIZING THE TRADITION"— Presentation transcript:

1 SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: REVITALIZING THE TRADITION
Stuart A. Umpleby Department of Management The George Washington University Washington, DC

2 A current transition to reflexive knowledge
Many people have contributed to the current change in thinking Heinz von Foerster, second order cybernetics Vladimir Lefebvre, ethical cognition George Soros, reflexivity theory in economics Karl Mueller, second order research Louis Kauffman, knot theory Klaus Krippendorff, the reflexive turn

3 Heinz von Foerster ( )

4 George Soros

5 Karl Mueller

6 Vladimir Lefebvre

7 Louis Kauffman

8 Klaus Krippendorff

9 The basic idea Science can be expanded by adding the observer to what is observed and considering the co-evolution of theories and society We would shift our thinking from viewing science as creating descriptions of systems to viewing science as an active part of social systems

10 World 1 3 Description Observer 2

11 Philosophers vs. scientists
Philosophers, in my experience, have a broad and multi-faceted conception of philosophy of science Practicing scientists have a narrower, rule-bound conception of philosophy of science Many social scientists seek to imitate their conception of physics Objective descriptions are thought to be the goal

12 How we think about social science
It is easy to accept that theories affect society We create theories because we hope that people will accept them, act on them and society will perhaps operate better However, when scientists conduct research, they usually assume that theories do not affect what is studied We act this way because we think this is the way to create objective descriptions

13 Four models underlying science
Linear causality – many statistical methods are available, e.g., correlation and multiple regression Circular causality – inherent in regulation, system dynamics models Self-organization – Adam Smith, Charles Darwin, complex adaptive systems Reflexivity – von Foerster, Soros, Lefebvre

14 Reflexivity Observe, decide, act, observe… A circular process
An observer is included Operates on two levels of analysis – observation and participation

15 The task of science is to produce accurate descriptions

16 The observer should be included within the domain of science

17 Social systems consist of observers who also participate

18 Four ways of describing systems
Variables – physics and economics Ideas – anthropology and psychology Groups – sociology and political science Events – history, law

19 A model of social change using four methods for describing systems
Ideas Variables Groups Events A model of social change using four methods for describing systems

20 A reflexive theory operates at two levels
Ideas Variables Groups Events A reflexive theory operates at two levels

21 A more holistic view of social systems
The current emphasis on disciplines leads to overspecialized points of view We need to make use of the knowledge from several fields in order to create the knowledge that we need to understand complex systems

22 The importance of purpose
Is the purpose of science to create universal general knowledge or to help human beings function effectively in nature and society? Probably science has both purposes, but adaptation of the individual and society is the larger purpose Methods for creating universal general knowledge should not prevent us from creating knowledge useful for survival

23 Expanding the base of knowledge for philosophy of science
Philosophers have primarily used the method of rational criticism Second order science can use a wide range of methods from any discipline – computer simulation, survey research, mathematical proofs, data analysis Second order science can use results of research in the biological and social sciences

24 Philosophical principles
Demarcation Induction Reflexivity The correspondence principle

25 Popper’s two principles
Demarcation – the difference between science and non-science: scientific statements must be falsifiable Induction – induction cannot lead to universal, general knowledge. A statement can be proven to be false, but not true

26 Soros’s philosophical principle
Reflexivity – systems composed of thinking participants are different from systems composed of non-thinking participants The presence or absence of reflexivity serves as a criterion of demarcation between social and natural phenomena

27 The Correspondence Principle
Proposed by Niels Bohr when developing the quantum theory Any new theory should reduce to the old theory to which it corresponds for those cases in which the old theory is known to hold A new dimension is required By applying the correspondence principle to the philosophy of science, we change not just one theory or one field but all of science

28 New philosophy of science
New philosophy of science An Application of the Correspondence Principle Old philosophy of science Amount of attention paid to the observer

29 Examples of the correspondence principle
Relativity theory – add the speed of light The gas laws – add the diameter of gas molecules Amount of attention paid to the observer The effect of a theory on the system described

30 Popper on second order tradition
What we call ‘science’ is differentiated from the older myths not by being something distinct from a myth, but by being accompanied by a second-order tradition – that of critically discussing the myth Before, there was only the first-order tradition. A definite story was handed on. Now, there was still a story to be handed on, but with it went a silent accompanying text of a second-order character

31 Second order tradition (2)
This second order tradition was the critical or argumentative attitude. It is the fundamentally important thing about scientific tradition Scientific myths are different from religious myths because if one adopts a critical attitude then one’s myths do become different. They change; and they change in the direction of giving a better and better account of the world – of the things which we can observe

32 Second order tradition (3)
And they also challenge us to observe things which we would never have observed without these theories or myths

33 Revitalizing the tradition
Perhaps second order science will revitalize tradition of science reflecting on itself

34 Contact Information Prof. Stuart Umpleby Department of Management School of Business George Washington University Washington, DC USA

35 Prepared for a panel discussion of Second Order Science
University Seminar on Reflexive Systems The George Washington University Washington, DC November 26, 2014

36


Download ppt "SECOND ORDER SCIENCE: REVITALIZING THE TRADITION"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google