Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Case study: Contract of districts in Brussels ENTP Presentation to the Mayor of Almere Brussels 27 th June 2007.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Case study: Contract of districts in Brussels ENTP Presentation to the Mayor of Almere Brussels 27 th June 2007."— Presentation transcript:

1 Case study: Contract of districts in Brussels ENTP Presentation to the Mayor of Almere Brussels 27 th June 2007

2 Some facts about Brussels 1 Region of 1 million inhabitants 19 Municipalities 2 linguistic Communities 2 nd richest region in the EU per GDP One of the poorest region in the EU concerning the overall income of inhabitants Rate of employment: around 18% and 34% for youngster under 25y Rate of immigrants: 27% (more than 55% are from the EU) Long years of deprivation of some districts due to: a lack of investment from the federal state, the non existence of the regional level and the financial speculation for the land.

3 The contract of districts - Organization An integrated approach in: The issues  Social housing  Housing under convention  PPP to involve owners in the regeneration of housing  Creation and development of public spaces (infrastructure, transport, environment)  Social regeneration (from infrastructure to economic regeneration) The territories  City  Districts  Neighbourhood  Surrounding areas The actors  EU  Federal government  Regions  Towns  Associations  Citizens

4 The contract of districts - how it works Partnership between the Municipality and the Region Positive discrimination: 15 disctricts representing 1/3 of inhabitants and receiving 80% of the city’s policy funding 4 years programmes Maximum 90% of subsidies from the region and minimum 10 % of subsidies from the Municipality Participatory approach: there is a Commission of concertation in each “quartiers” composed by 8 representatives of the inhabitants (elected by the inhabitants), 8 representatives of institutions, 4 delegates of NGOs businesses and schools and 1 representative of the local employment office Cooperation between the different level  Municipalities, associations and inhabitants set up projects  Region, EU, federal government, municipality fund the actions Interconnected priorities  Last 5 years only 20% job created in Brussels were taken by people living in Brussels  The residents are choosing to live in the suburbs  So employment policy need to be accompanied by housing policy, policy on public spaces, mobility and education

5 The Contract of districts- Evaluation Conditions for success  Political will  Sustainability in time  Scale of policies (degree of involvement, degree of cooperation, degree of integration between the different policies etc…) Positive aspects  Creation of new housings  Improvement of public spaces  Better social cohesion with the increase of the participation of inhabitants, the building of collective equipment and action on training and Professional insertion Negative aspects  Lack of visibility of the results for the inhabitants  Complex organization and procedures can create a segmentation of the initiatives  Involvement of the inhabitants: from passive observer to active citizen not always the case  Complexity of the relationship between associations, inhabitants and administration

6 The Contract of Districts - Main conclusions It is a good practice of an integrated approach in urban regeneration The need for coordination is even more pregnant in the belgian context Positive and real impacts at the local level for the inhabitants but.....difficulties to find the best ways to involve them.

7 Thanks Contacts Pascaline Gaborit: Pascaline.gaborit@newtowns.netPascaline.gaborit@newtowns.net Alfredo Corbalan: alfredo.corbalan@newtowns.netalfredo.corbalan@newtowns.net Marie-Violaine Polonowski: marie.polonowski@newtowns.netmarie.polonowski@newtowns.net www.newtowns.net


Download ppt "Case study: Contract of districts in Brussels ENTP Presentation to the Mayor of Almere Brussels 27 th June 2007."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google