1. CREAM: Semantic annotation system May 24, 2013 Hee-gook Jun

2. 2 / 20 References [1] From manual to semi-automatic semantic annotation: about ontology-based text annotation tools – COLING 2000 (Semantic Annotation and Intelligent Content) – M. Erdmann, A. Maedche, H.-P. Schnurr, S. Staab [2] CREAM: creating relational metadata with a component-based, ontology- driven annotation framework – K-CAP 2001 (Knowledge capture) – Siegfried Handschuh, Steffen Staab, Alexander Maedche [3] Authoring and annotation of web pages in CREAM – WWW 2002 – Siegfried Handschuh, Steffen Staab [4] S-CREAM - Semi-automatic CREAtion of Metadata – EKAW 2002 (Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web) – Siegfried Handschuh, Steffen Staab, Fabio Ciravegna University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany

3. 3 / 20 Outline  Web Annotations  Manual Annotation  CREAM: Ontology-driven annotation framework  S-CREAM: Semi-automatic CREation of Metadata  Conclusion  Discussion

4. 4 / 20 Web Annotations  Statements by an author about a Web document  External to the documents – Stored in one or more annotation servers  Annotation server should be able to – consult the annotations with a given document – add their own annotations  Tools: Annotea, SHOE, Ont-O-Mat

5. 5 / 20 Architecture of Annotea RDF database Annotation Servers Get RDF Store RDF Browser/Editor Web document Annotations

6. 6 / 20 Manual Annotation [1]  KA2 initiative – The main source of information for the KA portal stems from distributed web pages maintained by members of the KA community Editor aslkdfjlksjdfafdasdjflkj sdlkfjlaskdjflkjaslkdfjl asjdfkadfklsjafsasfasd fsafasdfdasfdsfasdf Docs Annotated Docs Knowledge Base Ontology Crawler Annotator

7. 7 / 20 Manual Annotation [1]: Problems  Syntax errors and typos of ontological entities  False references  Lack of deep domain knowledge

8. 8 / 20 Inference-supported Annotation [1]  CREAM – Integrates the ontology and the knowledge base into the editing evnironment Editor aslkdfjlksjdfafdasdjflkj sdlkfjlaskdjflkjaslkdfjl asjdfkadfklsjafsasfasd fsafasdfdasfdsfasdf Docs Annotated Docs Knowledge Base Ontology Crawler Annotator

9. 9 / 20 Inference-supported Annotation [1]  CREAM – Integrates the ontology and the knowledge base into the editing evnironment aslkdfjlksjdfafdasdjflkj sdlkfjlaskdjflkjaslkdfjl asjdfkadfklsjafsasfasd fsafasdfdasfdsfasdf Docs Annotated Docs Knowledge Base Crawler Annotator

10. 10 / 20 CREAM: Ontology-driven annotation framework [2]  Basic idea: Avoid error-prone and syntactic mistakes  Challenges – Consistency – Proper Reference – Avoid Redundancy – Relational Metadata – Maintenance – Ease of Use – Efficiency

11. 11 / 20 CREAM: Architecture [2]  Document Viewer and Ontology Guidance – Browsing Knowledge database  Document management – Avoid duplicate annotations and existing semantic annotations  Annotation Inference Server – Reasons on crawled and newly annotated ontology instances  Information Extraction

12. 12 / 20 CREAM: Architecture [2]  Ont-O-Mat: the implementation of CREAM framework

13. 13 / 20 CREAM: Meta Ontology [3]  Define the ontology rather independently of the purpose of creation of metadata by web and annotation

14. 14 / 20 CREAM: Annotation by Typing [3]  Working almost exclusively within the ontology guidance/fact browser where O is instance(or global URI) and C is Concept

15. 15 / 20 CREAM: Annotation by Markup [3]  Reuse of data from the document editor/viewer in the ontology guidance/fact browser

16. 16 / 20 CREAM: Annotation by Authoring [3]  Reuse of data from the fact browser in the document editor.

17. 17 / 20 S-CREAM: Semi-automatic CREation of Metadata [4]  Aligns conceptual markup – From Tag-like annotation to structured annotation  Discourse representation Docs Tagged output DR Thing

18. 18 / 20 S-CREAM  Ont-O-Mat and Amilcare – Producing XML tagged document Zwei Linden instOf Hotel Zwei Linden is located at Dobbertin Dobbertin instOf City Zwei Linden has room single room 1 Zwei Linden Dobbertin Single room

19. 19 / 20 Conclusion  Comprehensive framework for creating annotations – Ontology guidance/fact browser – Document management system – Meta ontology – Inference service – Information extraction  The foundation of the future semantic web

20. 20 / 20 Discussion  Strong point – Referenced paper – Providing an annotation tool  Weak point – Not well-organized paper – Legacy ontology model (DAML +OIL)