Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAdam Conley Modified over 9 years ago
1
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20021 Patent Law -- A VERY Brief Introduction by Roberta J. Morris, Ph.D., Esq. Adjunct Professor, University of Michigan Law School Member of the Patent Bar and of the Bars of New York and Michigan
2
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20022 OUTLINE A.Introduction: Questions concerning your project B.What is a patent (concrete) C.What is a patent (abstract) D.Major issues in Patent Law 1.Is [it] valid? 2.Is [it] infringed? 3.So what? (Remedies) “it” refers to a specific CLAIM of the patent, not “the patent” itself
3
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20023 A. THE QUESTIONS IN YOUR MIND Can we get a patent? Can someone else sue us on their patent? These questions reflect two basic concepts of patent law: VALIDITY and INFRINGEMENT. But to understand them, you have to understand what a patent is, and what a patent is not. For your term project, you may be wondering:
4
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20024 expired Mar. 30,1999
5
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20025 What is a patent (concrete) A patent can be divided into two parts: SPECIFICATION and CLAIMS What does the patent CLAIM? The CLAIMS are the special language that defines the legal significance of the patent, validity prior art -as to its “validity” over the “prior art”, and infringement - as to someone else’s infringement of it. What does the patent teach? Find the answer in the SPECIFICATION [no S, please]: {all the talk and the figures}
6
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20026 In the coffee lid patent, U.S. Patent No. 4,322,015, the SPECIFICATION is the text starting at column 1, line 1 and ending at column 5, line 11. The CLAIMS are the text in column 5, line 12 to the end. There is also a "cover sheet" (the top page). SPECIFICATION: The part of the patent where the inventor TEACHES you the art of the invention. CLAIMS: The part of the patent that defines the “metes and bounds” of the invention. The CLAIMS need to be valid. The CLAIMS determine what will infringe.
7
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20027 why the invention is different from the prior art claim to "priority" Drawings - necessary except for chemical inventions "Preferred Embodiment" another "term of art"
8
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20028 Figure 1 Claim 1
9
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 20029 Filing: $740 for up to 20 claims, of which up to 3 can be Independent Issue Fee: $1280 Maintenance: 3.5 years $880; 7.5 years $2020; 11.5 years $3100. There are many other fees if you miss a deadline, or otherwise need special treatment Provisional application: $160 These are the fees for anyone whose patent application is ASSIGNED to a big company. Independent inventors, universities, and employees of small businesses pay HALF. U.S. PATENT FEES (eff. Oct. 1,2001) http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/1999/fee20011001.ht m#patfee What is a patent (concrete): What does it cost?
10
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200210 PATENT FEES (European Patent Office, eff. March 6, 2001) http://www.european-patent-office.org/ The EPO estimated that as of July 1999, the cost of an average EPO patent would be 29800 Euros. http://www.european-patent-office.org/epo/new/kosten_e.pdf In the EPO, there are fees for examination and translation, as well as filling and grant. The U.S. is now considering instituting a separate fee for examination, too.
11
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200211 PATENT FEES (Korean Patent Office, eff. Apr. 9, 2001) http://www.kipo.go.kr/ [In WONS] Filing: electronic 29K, paper 39K (up to 20 pages of specification+drawings) Examination: 1st claim: 141K, each additional: 32K Registration (annually): 1st 3 years: 42K/yr + 14K per claim > 3, also per year. Later years are more expensive.
12
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200212 What is a patent - abstract –A patent has nationality. –A patent is a right to exclude, not a right to do. –"Patents don't last forever"
13
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200213 Patent laws are territorial: You can not sue in the US for infringement of a Korean, German or British patent, and vice versa. Patents have NATIONALITY I use US law for my examples. The laws of other countries are different, but the basic ideas are much the same world-wide.
14
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200214 A patent confers the right to exclude, NOT the right to do W invents and patents the WHEEL. B later invents and patents the BICYCLE. Who can make and sell BICYCLES?
15
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200215 A patent confers the right to exclude, NOT the right to do Not W, without a license from B -- or the risk of a lawsuit. Not B, without a license from W -- or the risk of a lawsuit (unless B wants to sell wheel-less frames to W’s customers). Who can make and sell BICYCLES?
16
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200216 The Right to Exclude A patent confers the Right to Exclude -- NOT The Right to Do so what happens when patents COMPETE? Licensing Retreat - Retool Lawsuit FISH STORY [M&A]
17
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200217 How the dilemma may be resolved OR
18
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200218 “Patents don’t last forever.” FRONT END: In general, you can not enforce your patent against infringers until the patent ISSUES. The patent process can take several years: APPLICATION EXAMINATION (office actions [rejections], amendments, appeals) ISSUANCE At every step, you pay the Patent Office a fee. = SUE! [start a lawsuit]
19
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200219 MIDDLE: Maintenance fees must be paid to the Patent Office to keep the patent in force. These fees must be paid in every country where you want patent protection. The fees to the various Patent Offices are only part of the costs. The other part is attorney fees. You will usually hire an attorney during the application process. You may also hire an attorney after the patent issues if you want to license or sue on your patent. “Patents don’t last forever.”
20
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200220 END: Patents expire after a certain amount of time. (Generally, 20 years from date of FILING.) So, how long DO patents last? Roughly, about 18 years, if all the fees are paid, and you have an easy time in the Patent Office (2 years from application to issuance) “Patents don’t last forever.”
21
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200221 The parts of a patent: the specification and the claims –and the claim chart –The idea of a patent search The phrase " prior art " The concept " person of ordinary skill in the art " Concepts and "terms of art" Major Issues in Patent Law Is it valid? Is it infringed? So what?
22
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200222 “anticipated” means the CLAIMED invention is found in a SINGLE piece of prior art Validity – to be valid a claim must be “new” (not ANTICIPATED, and not OBVIOUS) and “useful” Is it valid? Is it infringed? So what?
23
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200223 claim chart prior art If you made a claim chart, with each element of the claim on the left side, you could complete the right side by quoting/pointing to something in this single piece of prior art. What if something is missing in that piece, but you can find it in some other piece? Answer: then maybe the claimed invention is ‘OBVIOUS.’ Claim Chart – a 2 column chart that permits you to compare the claim of a patent to something else, in a visually informative way. prior art Prior Art – evidence that the invention, or at least some aspects of it, existed before this inventor’s activities. Actual devices, journal articles, advertisements, manuals, and of course other patents, can all be prior art.
24
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200224 The Claim 1. A container lid... comprising: - a central portion --adapted to nest within and below the rim of a container and -- rim engaging means --- around the entire periphery of the lid, - said rim engaging means being adapted to secure said lid... The Prior Art pretty standard stuff for a coffee lid Claim Chart
25
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200225 THE "PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART" (POSITA) Does the specification ENABLE the POSITA to make and use the invention? Are the claims OBVIOUS to the POSITA? OBVIOUSNESS, as well as other things in patent law, are judged from the point of view of:
26
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200226 What is “prior”? Anything more than 1 year before your application date ALSO Anything that is before your invention date. TWO THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW, IFYOU KNOW ANYTHING AT ALL ABOUT US PATENT LAW: The on-sale bar: anything YOU did more than a year before your application date could invalidate your patent. The duty of candor: you MUST tell the Patent Office what you know about prior art. You don’t have to search, but you have to be honest about what you know, and what you find.
27
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200227 Infringement: get out that old claim chart. Write the claim in the left column. The right hand column will have information about the “accused device.” invalid If the claim “reads on” the prior art, it is invalid. infringed If the claim “reads on” the accused device, it is infringed. Is it valid? Is it infringed? So what?
28
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200228 So what? “Damages”: no LESS than a “reasonable royalty” Opportunity for Multiplying those “damages” by a number up to 3 Opportunity for having the other side pay your attorney fees Prejudgment interest Injunctions: preliminary or permanent Is it valid? Is it infringed? So what? If the patent owner violated the duty of candor, for example by knowing it has an “on-sale bar” and not telling the Patent Office, and despite that the patent owner pursues the lawsuit, the court could order it to pay the accused infringer’s attorney fees.
29
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200229 BACK TO YOUR QUESTIONS Can we get a patent? Who is "we"? And a patent on what? the device ? a "method of doing business" ? a special component or material ?
30
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200230 Who is - or should be - "WE" : that is: Who qualifies as an "inventor"? Some possible answers –Everyone on the team –The professors –The person who machines some parts for the prototype, writes some code for the software, etc. X wrong ^ CAN WE GET A PATENT?
31
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200231 Who qualifies as an "inventor"? Forget politics Never lie to the Patent Office Different "claims" (different aspects of the invention) may have different inventors
32
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200232 Can we get a patent? –Why would we want to? Protect the “exclusivity” we hope to get (anyway) by being first-to-market Bargaining chip/defensive strategy Financing/Venture capital –What country/countrieses? –How much will it (they) cost? Fees to the Patent Office + Fees to attorneys
33
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200233 Can we get a patent? Answer: Yes, unless there is PRIOR ART that TEACHES the POSITA how to make and use our invention. (If that PRIOR ART is a patent, it will TEACH this in its SPECIFICATION.) If there is such prior art, then the PRIOR ART will make our CLAIMS unpatentable (=invalid) by making them OBVIOUS or ANTICIPATED. [The CAPITALIZED words are all “terms of art.”]
34
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200234 Can someone else sue us on their patent? Answer: NO, unless their CLAIMS “READ ON” our device or method. If one or more of their patent’s claims do “read on” our device, they may sue us (or offer us a license). If we are sued, it will not help us that - we did not know they had a patent, or - we invented the thing ourselves (we did not copy) INNOCENT INFRINGEMENT IS STILL INFRINGEMENT.
35
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200235 If we make our product, can someone else sue us for patent infringement? How will we know? WE find their patent THEY find us How can we protect ourselves from aggressive patent owners? –FIRST, get educated –Then maybe Get a license Design Around Get an opinion of counsel
36
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200236 Thank You. Questions?
37
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200237 Let W(x) be the operation of determining the worth of x; and let P=pictureF=figure C=ChartG=Graph D=DiagramH=Histogram E=EquationI=illustration w=word and let P = C ∪ D ∪ E ∪ F ∪ G ∪ H ∪ I then W(P) ≥ 1000W(w)
38
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200238 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts –SEARCHING FOR PATENTS (US) number search word search –Technology –Assignee using the PTO's Classification System (often the best) –Finding the right class/subclasses »use a patent you know about »word search the index
39
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200239 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts –"Prior Art" Patents Printed Publications –Books, Theses, Journal Articles, Print Advertisements and Brochures, Websites (even) "THINGS" - real objects that are "known or used" [by the public] or "in public use or on sale" Your own activities (more than 1 year before your US filing date)
40
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200240 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts Your own activities (more than 1 year before your US filing date) If you offer your product for sale, even if you do not have a working prototype, that COULD “start the clock.” Patent lawyers speak of the ON SALE bar, but the bar applies to offers, and to publications, preprints, trade show displays, etc. Other countries do not give you a ONE-YEAR grace period.
41
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200241 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT The ‘duty of candor’ who has it, and what those folks must do consequences of violation of this duty –The WHOLE patent is unenforceable – The patent owner may be liable for attorney fees of the accused infringer who defeated it
42
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200242 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT Validity of the specification –description –'enablement’ –'best mode’ Validity of the claims –Use Claim Chart to compare claims to prior art - “alone or in combination”
43
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200243 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT Some things we may have left unsaid: Do you need a working prototype to apply for a patent? –"Conception" and "Reduction to Practice" –Why do an 'actual' reduction to practice? –Why not? "Provisional Applications"
44
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200244 B. VALIDITY - patent applications Filing Date, and 'Office Actions' –Unique to the US: 'Interferences' and the 'first-to-invent' system Why you must keep lab notebooks What to do with them, and how often –Other Countries: OPPOSITIONS What the Patent Examiner Will Probably Do: REJECT the CLAIMS
45
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200245 B. VALIDITY - patent applications How to respond to a Final Rejection: Amend, Appeal, Abandon –The Three A's and when and why to do which
46
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200246 B. INFRINGEMENT - protecting patent rights –Marking (Why does our coffee lid have a patent number?) –Writing a Letter Licensing Starting the “damages” clock (“They” can’t plead ignorance)
47
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200247 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT –Calculating the "TERM" of a Patent [that is, determining when it expires] Concepts you need: –EARLIEST and MOST RECENT APPLICATION –"F+20" »F = filing date of EARLIEST application »20 = 20 years (to the day) –"I+17" »I = issue date of patent »17 = 17 years (to the day) –WARNING: Calculation assumes that patent owner pays all the MAINTENANCE FEES
48
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200248 Calculating the “term” of a US Patent No Which is later? 17 years from date of issue OR 20 years from date of filing of EARLIEST [US, regular] application Term is I+17 Term is F+20 Patent expires 20 years from date of EARLIEST application Was the MOST RECENT application on file by 6/8/95?
49
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200249 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts [specification and claims]
50
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200250 The two basic LIABILITY issues of patent law: VALIDITY and INFRINGEMENT VALIDITY: whether the invention - as CLAIMED - is "new." If it is, and if the application meets the other legal requirements, the patent is VALID. Patents are EXAMINED before they are issued (unlike copyrights). They are PRESUMED valid in court, but can be proven invalid. INFRINGEMENT: whether some UNAUTHORIZED person is using the inventions as CLAIMED.
51
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200251 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts What is the legal significance of the SPECIFICATION (no “s”) and and of the CLAIMS in connection with VALIDITY? We'll need one more "term of art": THE "PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART" (POSITA) Does the specification ENABLE the POSITA to make and use the invention? Are the claims OBVIOUS to the POSITA?
52
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200252 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts –"Prior Art" Patents Printed Publications –Books, Theses, Journal Articles, Print Advertisements and Brochures, Websites (even) "THINGS" - real objects that are "known or used" [by the public] or "in public use or on sale" Your own activities (more than 1 year before your US filing date)
53
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200253 A.YOUR QUESTIONS -- Concepts Your own activities (more than 1 year before your US filing date) If you offer your product for sale, even if you do not have a working prototype, that COULD “start the clock.” Patent lawyers speak of the ON SALE bar, but the bar applies to offers, and to publications, preprints, trade show displays, etc. Other countries do not give you a ONE-YEAR grace period.
54
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200254 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT Validity of the specification –description –'enablement’ –'best mode’ Validity of the claims –Use Claim Chart to compare claims to prior art - “alone or in combination”
55
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200255 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT The ‘duty of candor’ who has it, and what those folks must do consequences of violation of this duty –The WHOLE patent is unenforceable – The patent owner may be liable for attorney fees of the accused infringer who defeated it
56
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200256 B. VALIDITY & INFRINGEMENT Some things we may have left unsaid: Do you need a working prototype to apply for a patent? –"Conception" and "Reduction to Practice" –Why do an 'actual' reduction to practice? –Why not? "Provisional Applications"
57
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200257 B. INFRINGEMENT - protecting patent rights –Marking (Why does our coffee lid have a patent number?) –Writing a Letter Licensing Starting the “damages” clock (“They” can’t plead ignorance)
58
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200258 C. REMEDIES Now let’s consider what the outcome of a patent infringement lawsuit might be. We may be the patent owner, and we may be the accused infringer in that lawsuit. Or we might even be both!
59
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200259 C. REMEDIES –Injunctions (shutting down your plant) If the patent owner asks for a “preliminary injunction” the accused infringer will face enormous time presssure in mounting a defense Whether or not the patent owner obtains a preliminary injunction (one entered before the complete trial on all the facts), the patent owner will very often obtain a “permanent injunction” against any further infringement –Contempt proceedings (for violating an injunction)
60
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200260 SUMMARY You can get a patent, and maybe it is worth doing so. It is certainly worth checking whether you are likely to infringe, especially the patents of your big, strong competitors –In (either) process, you may find some expired or disclaimed patents with good ideas in them. –It pays to pay attention to patents.
61
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200261
62
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200262
63
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200263
64
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200264
65
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200265
66
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200266
67
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200267
68
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200268
69
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200269
70
RJMorris - Global Product Realization -Sept.26, 200270
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.