1. OIL and DAML+OIL: Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web 2005. 1. 10. Sungshin Lim sslim@pusan.ac.kr TOWARDS THE SEMANTIC WEB: Ontology-driven Knowledge Management Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Pusan National University

2. Page 2sslim@pusan.ac.kr Contents The Semantic Web Pyramid of Languages XML for Data Exchange Resource Description Framework (RDF) RDF Schema Ontology Inference Layer (OIL) DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language (OWL)

3. Page 3sslim@pusan.ac.kr The Semantic Web Pyramid of Languages

4. Page 4sslim@pusan.ac.kr XML for Data Exchange XML is designed for mark-up in documents of arbitrary structure XML provides a standardized syntactical way to expose structural information DTD defines a grammar to specify allowable combinations and nesting of tag names, attribute names, and so on. Although XML Schema offers several advantages over DTDs, their role is essentially the same. XML is used to server a range of purposes: –Serialization syntax for other mark-up languages e.g. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) –Separating form from content E.g. XSL –Uniform data-exchange format

5. Page 5sslim@pusan.ac.kr Resource Description Framework (RDF) RDF –is designed to standardize the definition –use of meta-data descriptions of web-based resource –is suited to representing data Basic building block –object–attribute-value –A(O,V) –[O] – A ->[V] Subject Object predicate Resource Value property Equivalent!

6. Page 6sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDF: Why do we need RDF? Sungshin Lim Sungshin Lim is the creator of the resource “http://klpl.re.pusan.ac.kr/page.html“. Sungshin Lim http://klpl.re.pusan. ac.kr/page.html Sungshin Lim http://klpl.re.pusan. ac.kr/page.html What is the correct way of expressing it?

7. Page 7sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDF: The RDF Data Model In RDF this sentence would be a triple: triple(page.html,creator,Sungshin Lim) creator(page.html,Sungshin Lim) page.html“Sungshin Lim“ creator Resource (subject) object Property (predicate) attribute Value (object) value

8. Page 8sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDF: The RDF Data Model page.html creator <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf = “http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#” xmlns:dc = “http://http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/”> Sungshin Lim “Sungshin Lim“

9. Page 9sslim@pusan.ac.kr http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# ID about type resource Description Tutorial: RDF Namespace

10. Page 10sslim@pusan.ac.kr Legend: Ellipse indicates "Resource" Rectangle indicates "literal string value" Tutorial: RDF Model (graph)

11. Page 11sslim@pusan.ac.kr <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.china.org/geography/rivers#Yangtze" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://www.geodesy.org/river#"> 6300 kilometers western China's Qinghai-Tibet Plateau East China Sea This is read as: This is a Description about the resource http://www.china.org/geography/rivers#Yangtze. This resource is an instance of the River type (class). The http://www.china.org/geography/rivers#Yangtze resource has a length of 6300 kilometers, a startingLocation of western China's Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and an endingLocation of the East China Sea." Tutorial: rdf:Description + rdf:type

12. Page 12sslim@pusan.ac.kr <rdf:Description rdf:ID="Yangtze" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://www.geodesy.org/river#" xml:base="http://www.china.org/geography/rivers"> 6300 kilometers western China's Qinghai-Tibet Plateau East China Sea Tutorial: Alternative Alternatively we can use rdf:ID rather than rdf:about, as shown here:

13. Page 13sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDF Schema RDFS extends RDF with “ schema vocabulary ”, e.g.: –Class, Property –type, subClassOf, subPropertyOf –range, domain RDF Schema for Simple Ontologies

14. Page 14sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDFS: Core Classes and Properties Core Classes Core Properties rdfs:Resource rdfs:Literal rdfs:XMLLiteral rdfs:Class rdf:Property rdfs:DataType rdfs:Type rdfs:SubClassOf rdfs:SubPropertyOf rdfs:Domain rdfs:Range rdfs:Label rdfs:Comment

15. Page 15sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDFS: Example A Vehicle Class Hierarchy This schema could also be described by the triples: ex:MotorVehicle rdf:type rdfs:Class. ex:PassengerVehicle rdf:type rdfs:Class. ex:Van rdf:type rdfs:Class. ex:Truck rdf:type rdfs:Class. ex:MiniVan rdf:type rdfs:Class. ex:PassengerVehicle rdfs:subClassOf ex:MotorVehicle. ex:Van rdfs:subClassOf ex:MotorVehicle. ex:Truck rdfs:subClassOf ex:MotorVehicle. ex:MiniVan rdfs:subClassOf ex:Van. ex:MiniVan rdfs:subClassOf ex:PassengerVehicle.

16. Page 16sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDFS: Example <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xml:base="http://example.org/schemas/vehicles"> The Vehicle Class Hierarchy in RDF

17. Page 17sslim@pusan.ac.kr RDFS: Example <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xml:base="http://example.org/schemas/vehicles"> The Vehicle Class Hierarchy Using the Typed Node Abbreviation

18. Page 18sslim@pusan.ac.kr Ontology Inference Layer (OIL) Ontology Inference Layer or Ontology Interchange Language a Web-based representation and inference layer for ontologies uses frame-based systems, description logics, and Web standards Frame-based Systems –Classes (frames) with properties (attributes, slots) Description Logics –describe knowledge in terms of concepts and role restrictions Web Standards: XML and RDF –extension of RDF and RDF Schema –compatible with RDF Schema (RDFS), and includes a precise semantics for describing term meanings

19. Page 19sslim@pusan.ac.kr Capabilities of OIL Support hierarchies of classes and properties –based on subclass and subproperty relations Allow classes to be built from other classes –using combinations of intersection (AND), union (OR), and complement (NOT) Allow the domain, range, and cardinality of properties to be restricted Support transitive and inverse properties Support concrete data types –integers, strings, etc.

20. Page 20sslim@pusan.ac.kr Example: OIL Ontology

21. Page 21sslim@pusan.ac.kr DARPA Agent Markup Language + OIL (DAML+OIL) Two languages developed to satisfy above requirements –OIL: developed by group of (largely) European researchers (several from OntoKnowledge project) –DAML-ONT: developed by group of (largely) US researchers (in DARPA DAML programme) Efforts merged to produce DAML+OIL –Development was overseen by joint EU/US committee DAML+OIL –a semantic markup language for Web resources –builds on earlier W3C standards such as RDF and RDF Schema, and extends these languages with richer modeling primitives –provides modeling primitives commonly found in frame-based languages –A DAML+OIL ontology consists of headers, class elements, property elements, and instances OWL (Web Ontology Language)

22. Page 22sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Namespace, Header Namespace Header –Version information –Comments –Imports

23. Page 23sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Class Defining Classes –In order to describe objects, it is useful to define some basic types. This is done by giving a name for a class, which is the subset of the universe which contains all objects of that type. subClassOf Multiple superclasses

24. Page 24sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Property Object properties Datatype properties

25. Page 25sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Property Restrictions Restriction defines an anonymous class, namely the class of all things that satisfy the restriction.

26. Page 26sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Addition to Existing Class If we want to add to a defined class, we need not modify previous statement, but we can simply add a class description:

27. Page 27sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Notations for Properties UniqueProperty inverseOf TransitiveProperty samePropertyAs

28. Page 28sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Notations for Classes complementOf disjointUnionOf intersectionOf sameClassAs

29. Page 29sslim@pusan.ac.kr DAML+Oil example: Defining Individuals

30. Page 30sslim@pusan.ac.kr The semantic web pyramid of languages  Data Exchange  Semantics+reasoning  Relational Data

31. Page 31sslim@pusan.ac.kr From RDF to OWL Two languages developed by extending (part of) RDF –OIL: developed by group of (largely) European researchers (several from EU OntoKnowledge project) –DAML-ONT: developed by group of (largely) US researchers (in DARPA DAML programme) Efforts merged to produce DAML+OIL –Development was carried out by “ Joint EU/US Committee on Agent Markup Languages ” –Extends ( “ DL subset ” of) RDF DAML+OIL submitted to W3C as basis for standardisation –Web-Ontology (WebOnt) Working Group formed –WebOnt group developed OWL language based on DAML+OIL –OWL language now a W3C Recommendation

32. Page 32sslim@pusan.ac.kr OWL is now a W3C Recommendation The purpose of OWL is identical to RDFS i.e. to provide an XML vocabulary to define classes, properties and their relationships. –RDFS enables us to express very rudimentary relationships and has limited inferencing capability. –OWL enables us to express much richer relationships, thus yielding a much enhanced inferencing capability. The benefit of OWL is that it facilitates a much greater degree of inferencing than you get with RDF Schema. Web Ontology Language (OWL)

33. Page 33sslim@pusan.ac.kr Origins of OWL RDF DAML+OIL DARPA Agent Markup Language A W3C Recommendation OIL OWL All influenced by RDF Ontology Inference Layer EU/NSF Joint Ad hoc Committee DAML OWL Lite OWL DL OWL Full

34. Page 34sslim@pusan.ac.kr OWL OWL and RDF Schema enable rich machine-processable semantics XML/DTD/XML Schemas RDF Schema OWL Semantics Syntax RDFS OWL