1.  26 January 2012 Dr. Herron-Thorpe will arrive at 10:00 to have you do the greenhouse gas survey

2. team assignments for CE 401

3. any questions from last Tuesday [orbital variations, radiative forcings] aerosols HW 4 is posted on the web – due Tuesday 1/31/2012 read MacKay pgs 241-245

4. HW 3: 1a: 0.05°C change in temperature with 1 w/m^2 change in solar irradiance 1b: albedo change from 31 to 30%  ~ 1°C change in temp 1c: eccentric earth orbit  ~4°C change in temp (2) in the figure below, approximately estimate the change in Earth equilibrium temperature (currently 288K) that would occur if CO 2 were completely removed from the atmosphere. In the graph below, the large drop in intensity of Earth radiance (an absorbance) near 680 wavenumbers is caused by 392 ppm CO 2.

5. Now I can relate area to temperature. T[K]area[sq] 220310 240423 260583 280783 Earth859 3001062

6. relationship of area on my piece of graph paper to temperature

7. Now measure the area under the CO 2 absorption: just dot the Earth curve in above the absorbed area and count squares in the absorbed area  76 sq. Subract 76 from 859 = 783 and compute the temperature from the best fit above, or just read it off the curve  783 sq corresponds to a temperature of 280K  the change in temperature is about 8°C (288 – 280K).

8. finish radiative forcing from last time

9. factors that influence the radiative equilibrium of the Earth system average solar input: 342 w/m 2 source IPCC 2007

11. global warming potential (GWP) of a gas [GWP g ]: a weighting factor to compare the GHG efficiency of a gas relative to CO 2. Compares potency of GHG to that of CO 2 : GWP g = F g x R g (t) dt / F CO2 x R CO2 dt where the integral is from time 0 to time T F g = radiative forcing efficiency of the gas in question [w m -2 kg -1 ] F CO2 = radiative forcing efficiency of CO 2 [w m -2 kg -1 ] R g = fraction of the 1 kg of gas remaining in the atmosphere at time t R CO2 = fraction of the 1 kg of CO 2 remaining in the atmosphere at time t radiative forcing efficiency is usually an exponential decay function, or ~ constant with time, depending on the gas. For CO 2 the decay is rapid the first few decades as the biosphere absorbs the carbon, then it decays at a much slower rate corresponding to the slow CO 2 uptake of the oceans Choice of time horizon for GWP depends on what a policy maker is interested in e.g. CH 4 GWP is 62 for 20 yr horizon, 23 for 100 yr, and 7 for 500 yr

13. compare CO 2 to CH 4 and N 2 O emissions for warming potential: emissions: CO 2 = 27,000 MMt CO 2 /yr US emissions CH 4 = 370 MMtCH 4 /yr N 2 O = 6 MMt N 2 O/yr [MMt = million metric tons] compare impacts to CO 2 : CH 4 : GWP 100 = 23*370 = 8510 MMtCO 2 equivalent N 2 O: GWP 100 = 296*6 = 1776 MMtCO 2 equivalent

14. aerosols

15. aerosols and their effects on climate big driver – HUGE driver, both human induced and natural RF not well understood – hardly on the data sheets in 1990 not well measured – satellites and ground networks – short record of data parameters that affect aerosols and their RF not understood global effects not well understood – clouds (height and distribution)

16. increasing complexity of the modeling world

17. aerosols: solid particles or liquid particles suspended in the air size: few nanometers to microns in size: x100 - 1000 variation in size have major impacts on climate physical properties: shape, size, chemical composition EPA regulates particles in the US PM10 and PM2.5 – CEE 341, 415 key aerosol groups: sulfates organic carbon black carbon nitrates mineral dust sea salt aerosols of clump together to form complex mixtures 90% of aerosols (by mass) are natural in origin about 10% of global aerosols are generated by human activity problems in dealing with aerosol effect: diversity in size, composition and origin; spatial and temporal variability; source; injection height aerosols removed primarily through cloud processing and wet and dry deposition

18. aerosol RF effects are categorized into direct and indirect effects: direct: mechanism by which aerosols scatter and absorb radiation  change in the radiative balance of the Earth system organic carbon, sulphate, nitrate, black carbon, dust, biomass burning indirect: mechanism by which aerosols modify the microphysical and hence the radiative properties, amount, and lifetimes of clouds size, shape, chemical composition, etc.

19. volcanic pollensea saltsoot fossil fuel combustion  SO2 which reacts with H2O and gases to  sulfate aerosols biomass burning  organic carbon and black carbon transportation sector  prolific producer of aerosols aerosols are usually modeled as spherical in shape – do they look spherical?????? properties: shape, size, composition, chemistry, polarization, index of refraction, mass,

20. - aerosol optical depth is the fundamental measure of quantity and distribution of aerosols - absorbance is proportional to exp{-  } where  is the optical depth. AOD is a measure of incident light scattered or absorbed.   is prop to path length and extinction cross section 2003-2006 average AOD

21. global aerosol distribution. Yellow = coarse particles like dust, red = fine particles like smoke or air pollution. MODIS data

24. MODIS 9 Oct 2010

25. different aerosols scatter or absorb sunlight differently depending on physical prop black carbon effects - modeled

26. indirect effects of aerosols: cloud formation and cooling aerosols play a critical role in cloud formation natural aerosols are most important but human produced aerosols have a significant impact ship tracks – white clouds and map of cloud droplet size  where ship exhaust is mixed with cloud layer, droplets are smaller

27. measurements of aerosols from satellites and networks of instruments AERONET

28. NASA Global Hawk at Edwards AFB, CA you guys ought to get involved in atmospheric studies – it is one heck of a lot of fun!

29. outstanding issues in aerosol effects on climate change: composition optical absorption impacts on surface radiation and heating long term trends total RF