Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmory Bridges Modified over 9 years ago
1
A Lightning Review of Dark Matter R.L. Cooper 6-6-2012
2
Orbital Velocity: A Sample Calculation The radial velocity of a probe a distance r from the galactic center The mass contained within r is M(r)
3
Expected Form Star light is majority of Baryonic mass Expectation: radial velocity fall-off Similar to Solar System Keplerian motion
4
Measured Radial Velocity Radial velocity mostly flat There’s a massive halo dictating galactic dynamics
5
More Evidence for Dark Matter Cosmic Microwave BackgroundLarge Scale Structure
6
Dark Matter Properties Local galactic velocity Energy density Cross section controls number density
7
Dark Matter Candidates Sources Baryonic Matter (e.g. MACHOS – MAssive Compact Halo ObjectS) Neutrinos Other exotics (Axions) Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs - ) Consequences Brown dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes, cold gas clouds, etc. Gravitational lensing Not enough matter
8
Dark Matter Candidates Sources Baryonic Matter (e.g. MACHOS – MAssive Compact Halo ObjectS) Neutrinos Other exotics (Axions) Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs - ) Consequences Hot dark matter Low mass implies relativistic at formation Large-scale structure is smoothed Masses < 1 eV Steriles?
9
Dark Matter Candidates Sources Baryonic Matter (e.g. MACHOS – MAssive Compact Halo ObjectS) Neutrinos Other exotics (Axions) Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs - ) Consequences Introduced to address the strong CP problem of QCD Low mass – Nambu- Goldstone boson Mass << 10 -3 eV Deeper analysis is beyond the scope of this report
10
Dark Matter Candidates Sources Baryonic Matter (e.g. MACHOS – MAssive Compact Halo ObjectS) Neutrinos Other exotics (Axions) Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs - ) Consequences 10-1000 GeV, very non- relativistic at formation Tiny cross-section Froze-out in early universe expansion Lightest Superparticle in SUSY (LSP) a top candidate Kaluza-Klein, extra-dim.
11
Dark Matter Abundance Annhilation rate in early universe (in equilibrium) Hubble expansion freezes out
12
Dark Matter Collisions Non-relativistic 10 -3 c Elastic scattering Neutralino LSP can interact through Higgs, Z, squark with matter Interaction on nucleon Coherent on nuclei implies A 2 enhancement (A,Z)
13
Recoil Energy Spectrum Recoil energy uniformly distributed from 0 to maximum energy deposit Incident WIMP energy Maxwellian A given energy deposit Exponential signal in energy deposit
14
Detection of Dark Matter Other neutral elastic collisions are backgrounds ( , n) and n recoil on nuclei recoil on electrons Recoils have very different Can imply different light output (e.g. quenching) Different excitation alter signal time-dependence Discrimination possible
15
Detection Methods Standard Techniques And combinations of these Other Methods (A,Z) n Ionization Scintillation Phonons Bubble Chamber Gas / Directional Axion Cavities Direct / Indirect searches Yearly / sidereal variation
16
decay ( , n) reaction fissions n n n n -induced n spallation Multiplicity? Uncorrelated Neutron Backgrounds rock Coherent scattering
17
n -induced n spallation Correlated Neutron Backgrounds rock radio-impurities n
18
Reading Exclusion Plots Finite detection threshold Flux decrease ~ 1 / m Excluded Available Phase Space
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.