1. W ORKSHOP FOR P ROPOSED R EGULATION A MENDMENTS S UBDIVISION OF L AND NAC 278.290, 278.330, 278.340, 278.390 AND 278.510 LCB F ILE N O. R020-15 Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Carson City, NV ~ August 27, 2015 Video Conferenced to Las Vegas

2. NDEP R EPRESENTATIVES Bureau of Safe Drinking Water Jim Balderson, Engineering Branch Supervisor jbalderson@ndep.nv.gov775-687-9517 jbalderson@ndep.nv.gov 2

3. P UBLIC P ARTICIPATION Ways to Participate and Comment Questions and Comments today By September 30, for NDEP consideration & inclusion in Testimony to SEC Written Comments by letter: Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Safe Drinking Water 901 South Stewart Street, Suite 4001 Carson City, NV 89701 E-mail or call us with your Comments SEC Hearing (October 14, 2015) 3

4. R EGULATION A MENDMENT P ROCESS Draft Regulation Available Posted to SEC website, August 12, 2015 http://www.sec.nv.gov/main/hearing_1015.htm Workshop: August 27, 2015 State Environmental Commission (SEC) Hearing (October 14, 2015) Sign up at http://www.sec.nv.gov/ to receive noticeshttp://www.sec.nv.gov/ 4

5. R EGULATION A MENDMENT P ROCESS 5

6. O VERVIEW Amendment History Subdivision Review Process Current and New Approach General Cleanup 6

7. AMENDMENT HISTORY NDEP Draft Regulation 10/27/2014 Workshop Hearing 11/18/2014 NDEP Revised Draft 12/01/2014 Withdrawn from 12/03/14 SEC Hearing NDEP Revised Draft 12/15/2014 01/15/2015 – Met with Interested Parties NDEP Revised Draft 03/12/2015 SEC Adopts Temporary Amendment 05/06/2015 Temporary Amendments Filed and Effective 06/10/2015 LCB Prepares Draft Permanent Regulation 07/24/2015 Workshop for Permanent Amendments 08/27/2015 SEC Hearing Scheduled for 10/14/2015 7

8. T EMPORARY VS. P ERMANENT A MENDMENT July 1 of Even-Numbered Years (2014) Legislative Council Bureau (LCB) Busy Prepping for February 2015 Session Start No LCB Review of Temporary Regulations Must be Heard by SEC twice – again after July 1, 2015 as a Permanent Amendment 2 nd Round of Workshops – 08/27/2015 Permanent Amendment Language has changed, but the intent is the same. If not approved, Temporary Amendments expire November, 2015. 8

9. O VERARCHING G OAL OF A MENDMENTS Change process and timing of document review and approval to provide earlier opportunity to legally grade land and construct utilities at subdivision projects, if desired. 9

10. W HAT A RE Y OU C HANGING ? Providing alternate timing for plan submittal to provide options for developers who need them Proposed Amendments to not change overall program requirements or fees 10

11. K EY T ERMS & D EFINITIONS Key Terms: Tentative Map Plans for Improvements Final Map “Improvement” Defined: NRS 278.0155 “Improvement” means such street work and utilities to be installed on land dedicated or to be dedicated for streets and easements as are necessary... 11

12. W HICH R EGULATION IS THE F OCUS ? NAC 278.340 - Construction prohibited until final map approved Language prior to the temp amendments: “The developer shall not perform any construction on the site of a subdivision, except that necessary to evaluate the subdivision, until the Division or local agency approves the final map.” 12

13. W HAT D OES “ ANY CONSTRUCTION ” M EAN ? 2008 – BSDW Position in letter to Washoe County Health District Grading was construction (Clearing and grubbing also considered construction) Plan approval prior to grading is important for protection of public health If land is graded “wrong” then water/sewer crossing designs can be adversely affected “Can’t get slopes, need to put sewer over water” 13

14. W HAT WAS THE P ROBLEM ? In Washoe County – “Water Plan” Design is occurring with TMWA long before WC Health District review staff’s involvement. Catch-22 for Subdivisions in flood plains Cannot grade until Final Map is approved; BUT FEMA won’t sign Final Map until land is re-graded out of the 100-year flood plain. 14

15. W HAT WAS THE P ROBLEM ? Improvement Plans and Final Map are submitted together with short review timeframe before going to a Board for approval. Problems identified in Engineering Design Review of Improvement Plans (resulting in plan denial & requiring resubmittal) de- rail preferred project timing 15

16. W HAT WAS THE P ROBLEM ? Builder’s Association of Northern Nevada engaged Washoe County Health District in discussion to seek process improvement Washoe County Health District engaged NDEP in discussion of options BANN & WCHD initially proposed “pilot” of new process NDEP determined it could not be done within the existing Regulation, so Amendment was proposed. 16

17. W HAT WAS THE P ROBLEM ? Over the winter, we learned that other Counties allow construction of utilities upon approval of Plans for Improvements (Prior to the Final Map processing). 17

18. W HAT IS C HANGING ? Plans for Improvements will be divorced from Final Map Plans for Improvements can be submitted for review and approval any time. Expected to be after the Tentative Map phase. Clearing, grubbing, grading and construction of utilities can occur after Plans for Improvements are approved. ****Does not change req’s for other environmental (i.e. dust control) or building permits**** 18

19. A MENDED NAC 278.340 “ The developer shall not perform any construction on the site of a subdivision, except that necessary to evaluate the subdivision, until the Division or local agency approves the [final map.] plan for improvements. 19

20. A SSOCIATED A MENDMENTS NAC 278.290 – “When a developer submits a final map... [it must have plans to show water supply and sewerage]. Change adds: “1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, when a developer submits a final map of his or her subdivision for review, the developer must also provide a complete plan for improvements showing the 20

21. NAC 278.290 (C ONT ’ D ) systems of water supply and sewage disposal for the area to be developed.” 2. A developer may submit a plan for improvements for review before submitting the final map. If such a plan for improvements is approved before the final map is submitted: (a) The plan for improvements must be resubmitted for review to the Division 21

22. NAC 278.290 (CONT’D) or local agency if any changes are made to the plan before the final map is submitted. The changes must be clearly identified on the plan when it is resubmitted to the Division or local agency. (b) When submitting the final map for review, the developer must include a certification by the professional engineer of record for the subdivision stating 22

23. NAC 278.290 (CONT’D) that no changes have been made to the plan for improvements, except for any changes approved in accordance with paragraph (a).” (Review Agencies can speed up review if we are shown what was/wasn’t changed.) 23

24. A SSOCIATED A MENDMENTS Change to NAC 278.330 divorces Improvement Plans from the Final Map: “The Division or local agency shall review and either approve or disapprove the [plans for improvements shown on the] final map and related plans or the plan for improvements submitted in accordance with subsection 2 of NAC 278.290 within 30 days after receipt of the map and related plans [.] or the plan for improvements. 24

25. NAC 278.330 (CONT’D) 2. The Division or local agency shall give written notice of its approval or disapproval to the developer. If the Division or local agency disapproves the map or related plans [,] or the plan for improvements, its notice must include the reasons for its action. 25

26. A SSOCIATED A MENDMENTS NAC 278.340 is amended to read as follows: 278.340 The developer shall not perform any construction on the site of a subdivision, except that necessary to evaluate the subdivision, until the Division or local agency approves the [final map.] plan for improvements. 26

27. A SSOCIATED A MENDMENTS NAC 278.510 is amended to read as follows: 278.510 1. Before a developer begins construction of any improvements based on the final map [,] or the plan for improvements, the developer must be able to show proof that [the] : (a) The map includes a certificate of approval Issued by the Division or local agency pursuant to NRS 278.377 and NAC 2 78.310 [.] : or 27

28. NAC 278.510 (CONT’D) (b) The plan for improvements includes a written notice of approval issued by the Division or local agency in accordance with subsection 2 of NAC 278.330. The proof must be available at the job site. 28

29. W ILL F EES C HANGE ? No change will be made to the fee schedule. The temporary Amendment had a section on fees, but it was removed by LCB. If these amendments are approved, the fee for the Final Map will still be $400 and no separate fee will be necessary when submitting Plans for Improvements for review and approval. 29

30. D O I H AVE T O C HANGE ? Do I have to separate Improvement Plan and Final Map submittals? No! This is only an option. Improvement Plans can still be submitted at the same time as the Final Map. If a developer chooses to construct prior to Final Map processing, they are doing so at their own risk. 30

31. S MALL B USINESS I MPACTS ? Presumed to be only positive impacts Government process improvement Engineering Design Review earlier in process - expected to allow more time to resolve infrastructure concerns before the push to complete and record the Final Map Permits initial grading sooner & may lead to Final Map and land development more quickly Agree/Disagree? Thoughts? 31

32. G ENERAL C LEAN - UP NAC 278.390: “Analyses of water quality may be performed in the State Public Health Laboratory, or any other laboratory certified by the [State Health Officer,] Division, upon the developer’s submission, in sample containers that are appropriate for such analyses, of an adequately identified sample consisting of [1 gallon of water.] the volume of water necessary to conduct analyses of water quality. 32

33. M ORE C LEAN U P N EEDED NAC 278.260 5. currently reads: Unless water for the subdivision is to be supplied from an existing public water system, a report of the analyses of four 1-gallon samples taken in or adjacent to the subdivision from different wells. The analyses must show that the water meets the standards prescribed in NAC 445A.450 to 445A.492. NDEP will propose a similar modification to this language prior to the SEC hearing to be consistent with changes proposed for NAC 278.390. 33

34. C OMMENTS OR Q UESTIONS 34 Bureau of Safe Drinking Water Jim Balderson jbalderson@ ndep.nv.gov775-687-9515 Presentation http://ndep.nv.gov/bsdw/regulation_amendments.htm