Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byImogene Conley Modified over 9 years ago
1
2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Nobel Laureates in Economics: The Implications of Their Work for Actuarial Analysis Harry Shuford, Chief Economist National Council on Compensation Insurance CASE Annual Meeting September 23, 2004 Atlanta, Georgia
2
2 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Today’s Discussion Background on the Nobel in Economics Areas with Implications for Actuarial Analysis – Financial Economics – Asymmetrical Information – Behavioral Economics/Finance – Econometrics Valuable Insights/Observations – part 1 Valuable Insights/Observations – part 2
3
3 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Today’s Discussion Background on the Nobel in Economics
4
4 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Financial Economics – Markowitz - 1990 for work in the late 1950s – Modigliani & Miller – 1990 for work in the 1960s – Sharpe- 1990 for work in the 1960s – Scholes and Merton – 1997 for work in the 1970s
5
5 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Asymmetrical Information – Mirrlees – 1996 for work in 1970s – Akerlof – 2001 for work in mid to late 1960s – Spence – 2001 for work in early 1970s – Stiglitz – 2001 for work in mid 1970s
6
6 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Behavioral Economics/Finance – Kahneman – 2002 for work in the 1970s
7
7 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Econometrics – Trygve Haavelmo – 1989 for work in the 1940s – Engle – 2003 – Granger – 2003
8
8 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Financial Economics – Markowitz - microfinance portfolio theory Mean variance Efficient frontier recognizing covariance of securities Quadratic objective function – Modigliani & Miller – corporate finance Capital structure per se (I.e. debt/equity) no effect on value of the firm Expected return on stock increases linearly with debt/equity ratio Stockholders can offset in the market any undesired change in firm’s structure – Sharpe – market focus - CAPM Systematic vs. Diversifiable risk Risk premium based on covariance with market return Market portfolio and lending/borrowing @ risk free rate – Scholes and Merton – option pricing model Risk is embedded in price of underlying asset Contingent claim concept applies to insurance Strike price - /expected share value +/volatility of share price +/time+/risk free rate +
9
9 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Asymmetrical Information – Mirrlees – optimal income taxes Moral hazard Disincentive to work to avoid taxes Hide income to avoid taxes – Akerlof – sellers have more/withhold info re: buyers - market for lemons Adverse selection Why would I want to buy if he wants to sell? Medical insurance pricing – esp. elderly – Spence – better informed incur costs to improve outcomes Signaling Factory mutuals and fire protection services Auto warranties - – Stiglitz – poorly informed extract info from better informed Screening Insurance deductibles MGAs and retentions
10
10 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Behavioral Economics/Finance – Kahneman – decision making under uncertainty/irrational behavior – Expected utility is not entirely convex – Different response to the same problem depending on how it’s presented – Loss aversion – Prospect theory – Ignore/overlook prior information
11
11 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Econometrics – Trygve Haavelmo – made econometrics probabilistic Statistical inference/hypothesis testing Simultaneous interactions/identification problem – Engle – changing volatility over time autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) – Granger – time series with common trends cointegration
12
12 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Valuable Insights/Observations – Friedman – policy lags/positive vs normative – Lucas – rational expectations – Arrow – theory of insurance – Simon – satisficing vs. maximizing – Tobin – Tobin’s Q/risk free asset vs market portfolio – Heckman – selection bias – Fogel & North – technology and development – Samuelson
13
13 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Valuable Insights/Observations – The standard model: Self interested rational behavior Full information – Akerlof’s “Market for Lemons” story Article rejected twice as being trivial Article rejected as undermining standard model Article finally accepted – Today’s models are varied and include: The standard model Models to explain behavior with incomplete and asymmetrical info – Behavioral finance – irrational exuberance – Auctions (Vickery & Smith) – Measuring “happiness” – How effective are today’s actuarial methods? – Are they seasoned or just stale?
14
14 2004 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Thanks for Your Interest Questions and Comments
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.