1. Self-Stabilizing K-out-of-L Exclusion on Tree Networks Stéphane Devismes, VERIMAG Joint work with: – Ajoy K. Datta (Univ. Of Nevada) – Florian Horn (LIAFA) – Lawrence L. Larmore (Univ. Of Nevada)

2. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting2 Roadmap Recall on Self-stabilization Definition of the problem The solution Conclusion and perspectives

3. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting3 Roadmap Recall on Self-stabilization Definition of the problem The solution Conclusion and perspectives

4. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting4 Self-Stabilization: Closure + Convergence States of the System Illegitimate States Legitimate States Convergence Closure

5. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting5 Property: Tolerance to Transient Faults

6. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting6 Roadmap Recall on Self-stabilization Definition of the problem The solution Conclusion and Perspectives

7. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting7 K-out-of-L Exclusion [Raynal, 91] L resource units Requests from 1 to K resource units (K≤L)

8. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting8 K-out-of-L Exclusion 3 property to ensure: –Safety –Fairness –Efficiency

9. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting9 Safety At any time: –Each resource unit is used by at most one process –Each process uses at most K resource units –At most L resource units are available

10. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting10 Fairness Each request (of at most K units) is satisfied in finite time (i.e. the process then uses the resource units it holds in a special section of code called critical section)

11. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting11 Efficiency « As many requests as possible must be satisfied simultaneously » More formally: (K,L)-Liveness

12. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting12 (K,L)-Liveness 3? 2? 1?

13. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting13 Waiting Time « The maximum number of time, all other processes can enter in the critical section before some process p, starting from the moment requests the critical section »

14. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting14 Roadmap Recall on Self-stabilization Definition of the problem The solution Conclusion and perspectives

15. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting15 Model Message-passing Bounded process memories FIFO bidirectional links Topology : oriented tree Necessary condition [Gouda-Multari, 91]: –Bounded link capacity (CMAX)

16. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting16 Approach Token-based (resource units = tokens) Modular: –Non Self-stabilizing K-out-of-L Exclusion –Self-stabilizing Controller

17. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting17 DFS circulation

18. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting18 First idea: K-out-of-L Exclusion = L-circulation 0 21 3? {0}{0,2}{0,2,2}

19. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting19 Deadlocks r 3?2? 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 123 {1} {0} {0,0}

20. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting20 Solution Circulation of a special token : the pusher Upon receiving the pusher: a node releases all its resource tokens if its request is not satisfied

21. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting21 Livelock 0 00 1 1? 2? {0}

22. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting22 Solution Circulation of a Priority Token: –A requesting process keeps the Priority Token while its request is unsatisfied –The Priority Token cancels the effect of the Pusher Token

23. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting23 Self-Stabilization: The Controller After transient faults: –Some tokens may have disappeared –Some tokens may been duplicated Solution: a Controller Token counts and regulates the number of tokens

24. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting24 Example: Count the Resource Tokens

25. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting25 Example: Count the Resource Tokens 0 {0,1} 1 1 1 2 2 2 2

26. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting26 Example: Count the Resource Tokens At the end of the traversal: –The number of token is known Too much tokens : RESET Lake of tokens : Creation at the root

27. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting27 How to stabilize the Controller ? Implemented as a Self-Stabilizing DFTC using the Varghese Counter Flushing

28. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting28 Self-Stabilizing DFTC 0 0 r 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stabilize using (n-1)(2CMAX+1)+1 values TokenHolder: Receive MesVal from a child and MyVal = MesVal Receive MesVal from Parent and MyVal ≠ MesVal

29. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting29 Roadmap Recall on Self-stabilization Definition of the problem The solution Conclusion and perspectives

30. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting30 Conclusion Waiting Time: L*(2n-3) 2 Oriented Tree -> Arbitrary Rooted Network (Huang-Chen BFS Tree) Bounded/Unbounded Link Capacity (Katz & Perry)

31. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting31 Perspectives Compute the convergence time Enhance the waiting time ? Reactive solution ? Fault-Containment ?

32. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting32 Thank you!

33. May 18th 2009SHAMAN Meeting33 (K,L)-Liveness Let V be the set of processes Let I be a subset of processes that execute their critical section forever (in particular they hold some resource units forever) Let  be the number of resource units held by I Let R be the subset of V - I such that any process in R is a requestor Let r max by the maximal request of a process in R If R ≠Ø and r max ≤ L -  then at least one member of R eventually satisfies its request