Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJoanna Bryan Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Final State Interaction in the pp + (np) and pp + (Λp) Reactions R. Siudak Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik der Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland Motivation Experimental technique Results and FSI analysis
2
FSI parameters of the np system very well known Motivation pp + np
4
FSI parameters of the np system very well known ratio spin-singlet spin-triplet = ? Motivation
5
spin-singlet spin-triplet = ? pp + np
6
FSI parameters of the np system very well known ratio spin-singlet spin-triplet = ? Motivation Detailed comparison of the and pp + nppp + d
7
pp + np FSI parameters of the np system very well known ratio spin-singlet spin-triplet = ? pp→K + Λp FSI parameters of the Λp system can be deduced Search for strange (S=-1) dibaryons Motivation Detailed comparison of the and pp + nppp + d
8
Data from Nucl. Phys. A 567(1994) 819 F. Hinterberger and A. Sibirtsev, Eur. J. Phys. A 21 (2004) 313 pp→K + Λp FSI parameters of the Λp system can be deduced
9
pp→K + Λp
10
A. Gasparyan, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart and. J. Speth Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 034006 Spin average scattering length of -1.5 fm
13
pp + np FSI parameters of the np system very well known ratio spin-singlet spin-triplet = ? pp→K + Λp FSI parameters of the Λp system can be deduced Search for strange (S=-1) dibaryons Motivation Detailed comparison of the and pp + nppp + d
14
pp + np FSI parameters of the np system very well known ratio spin-singlet spin-triplet = ? pp→K + Λp FSI parameters of the Λp system can be deduced Search for strange (S=-1) dibaryons Unique combination of the COSY cooled proton beam and the spectrograph Big Karl can deliver high resolution data for pp + X and pp→K + X Motivation Detailed comparison of the and pp + nppp + d
15
Cooler Synchrotron COSY w Juelich - up to 3.6 GeV/c - e and stochastic cooling, - luminosity achieved: L = 10 32 cm -2 s -1 - p and d beams - (cooled) beam quality: = 0.4 mm mrad ( = 0.5 mm ) ~0.1% halo at = 2.5 mm p/p = 5 10 -5 - p vector polarised - d vector and tensor polarised
20
σ mm =97 KeV the deuteron peak
21
A. Betsch et al. pp + X
23
I. Jour. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005)291 spin triplet, isospin singlet a= +5.396 fm r 0 = 1.726 fm spin singlet, isospin triplet a= -23.678 fm r 0 = 2.51 fm
24
Detailed comparison of the pp np and pp + d
26
pp→ + np
27
pp + X pp + pn 1 GeV A. Boduard et al. pd p X -.-.-.- spin-triplet ….... spin-singlet
28
D –state effects for pp + np ? D –state effects for pp + d Detailed comparison of the pp np and pp + d
29
D –state effects for pp + np ? D –state effects for pp + d Detailed comparison of the pp np and pp + d
30
R GEM unpublished T p (GeV) GEM Pleydon et al. R GEM unpublished
31
pp →K + Λ p p z (MeV/c) P y (MeV/c) P beam =2735 MeV/c p BK = 1070 MeV/c
32
p(p,X)
34
Θ = 0 deg MM=350 keV
35
Summary - High resolution data for the pp + X and pp K + X reactions were measured Unique combination of the COSY cooled proton beam and the spectrograph Big Karl provides excellent resolution in np and Λp excitation energy - The reaction pp + np is dominated by the spin-triplet contribution to the (np) FSI - Upper limit of possible singlet contribution was deduced - Hypothesis of the importance of the D-state in the np system Data analysis for the pp→K + X reaction in progress
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.