Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGinger Riley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Automation and Quality in Image Digital Libraries with Annotations Edward Fox, Uma Murthy and Ricardo Torres Florence, Italy 17 February 2007
2
2 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
3
3 Acknowledgements: Students Pavel Calado, Yuxin Chen, Fernando Das Neves, Shahrooz Feizabadi, Robert France, Marcos Gonçalves, Doug Gorton, Nithiwat Kampanya, Rohit Kelapure, S.H. Kim, Neill Kipp, Aaron Krowne, Bing Liu, Ming Luo, Roberto Marchesini, Paul Mather, Sudarshan Murthy, Uma Murthy, Sanghee Oh, Ananth Raghavan, Unni. Ravindranathan, Ryan Richardson, Rao Shen, Ohm Sornil, Hussein Suleman, Ricardo da Silva Torres, Srinivas Vemuri, Wensi Xi, Seungwon Yang, Baoping Zhang, Qinwei Zhu, …
4
4 Acknowledgements: Faculty, Staff Lillian Cassel, Lois Delcambre, Debra Dudley, Roger Ehrich, Joanne Eustis, Weiguo Fan, James Flanagan, C. Lee Giles, Sandy Grant, Eric Hallerman, Eberhard Hilf, John Impagliazzo, Filip Jagodzinski, Douglas Knight, Deborah Knox, Alberto Laender, David Maier, Gail McMillan, Claudia Medeiros, Manuel Perez-Quinones, Jeff Pomerantz, Naren Ramakrishnan, Layne Watson, Barbara Wildemuth, …
5
5 Other Collaborators (Selected) Brazil: FUA, UFMG, UNICAMP Case Western Reserve University Emory, Notre Dame, Oregon State Germany: Univ. Oldenburg Mexico: UDLA (Puebla), Monterrey College of NJ, Hofstra, Penn State, Villanova Portland State University University of Arizona, University of Florida, Univ. of Illinois, University of Virginia VTLS (slides on digital repositories, NDLTD)
6
Acknowledgements: Support ACM, Adobe, AOL, CAPES, CNI, CNPq, CONACyT, DFG, FAEPEX, FAPESP, IBM, IMLS, Microsoft, NASA, NDLTD, NLM, NSF (IIS-9986089, 0080748, 0086227, 0307867, 0325579, 0532825, 0535057, 0535060; ITR-0325579; DUE-0121679, 0121741, 0136690, 0333531, 0333601, 0435059), OCLC, SOLINET, SUN, SURA, UNESCO, US Dept. Ed. (FIPSE), VTLS, …
7
7 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
8
Digital Libraries --- Objectives World Lit.: 24hr / 7day / from desktop Integrated “super” information systems: 5S: Table of related areas and their coverage Ubiquitous, Higher Quality, Lower Cost Education, Knowledge Sharing, Discovery Disintermediation -> Collaboration Universities Reclaim Property Interactive Courseware, Student Works Scalable, Sustainable, Usable, Useful
9
9
10
10 Alliteration 5S –Societies Users Collaboration, Web 2.0 –Scenarios Workflow, Stories Services, Components –Spaces: GIS –Structures: DBMS –Streams: DSMS 3C –Content Content Management Systems –Context Link Structure NLP Mental models –Criticism, commentary Annotation, Talmud Cataloging, indexing Abstracting Summarizing Secondary literature
11
11
12
12 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
13
13 Consider this scenario 1. Ingrid is a graduate student in the Fisheries department doing research on freshwater fish 2. In a field visit, she finds a unique-looking fish, and wants to know more. 3. She wants to search for related information based on others’ observa- tions, in the dept. DB. Also, she wants to enter new infor- mation about the fish into the DB. Source: http://umd.edu/http://umd.edu/ Source: http://umd.edu/http://umd.edu/
14
14 EKEY: The electronic key for identifying freshwater fishes
15
15 Next, Ingrid works on an assignment to gain familiarity with the capabilities of a new Biodiversity Information System. She is required to make the system help her with her complex integrated information need: “Retrieve fish descriptions of all fish whose shape is similar to that shown in the figure below, which belong to genus “Notropis”, which have “large eyes” and “dorsal stripe”, and have been observed within the catchments of the “Tennessee” river.”
16
16 Here is another scenario … An archeologist wants to write commentaries on artifacts discovered in the field –Manually annotate images (and parts) –Search for images (and parts), and annotations –Automatically annotate/tag similar images (and parts) –Share annotations and images Using an Archeology digital library in his study, he wants to be able to : Sources: http://www.dorsetforyou.com, http://www.archaeology.orghttp://www.dorsetforyou.comhttp://www.archaeology.org Source: http://www.bewegende-plaatjes.nethttp://www.bewegende-plaatjes.net
17
17 Functionality required Digital Library (DL) users need, but get little assistance, regarding tasks: –Selecting and Annotating images and parts of images Preserve original context of information Manual and automated annotation –Content-based image retrieval of images and parts of images (+ GIS + metadata + text …), machine learning of proper set of descriptors –Sharing selections and annotations
18
18 New Microsft Research grant Virginia Tech and UNICAMP (Brazil) Fisheries & Wildlife, Computer Science Tablet PCs: Content-Based Image Retrieval Superimposed Information +
19
19 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
20
20 Superimposed information (SI) New interpretation of existing information –New content, new structures Focuses on –Information at sub-document granularity –Information from heterogeneous sources (multimedia content) –Working with information in situ
21
21 Origin of SI This basic need had been addressed in diverse ways, with varying degrees of success, for many years: –concordances, annotations, comments –bookmarks, concept maps, digital annotations, … The term “SI” was coined in 1999 by researchers, currently collaborating with us, now at Portland State University –Lois Delcambre –David Maier
22
22 Layers in an SI system * Source: ICDE04 presentation by Murthy, et. al
23
23 Benefits Specificity of reference Flexibility –Identifying interesting (parts of) objects –Making connections between selections –Managing collections of selections References sub-document information –Preservation of context –Facilitates easy sharing of information
24
24 Superimposed Applications SIMPEL: A SuperImposed Multimedia Presentation Editor and pLayer 0 5 10 15 20 A C B Enhanced CMapTools
25
25 Combining CBIR and SI Associate images and parts of images, with related information such as annotations, hyperlinks, metadata records, etc. Perform CBIR on images and parts of images that have been annotated Combine text- (on annotations and other associated text information) and content-based (image content) search for more effective retrieval of images and parts of images
26
26 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
27
27 Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) Retrieve images similar to a user-defined specification or pattern (e.g., shape sketch, image example) Goal: To support image retrieval based on content properties (e.g., shape, color or texture), usually encoded into feature vectors
28
28 Textual information retrieval Query on Google using Sunset and Rio de Janeiro Query result
29
29 Content Based Information Retrieval
30
30 Effective Image Description + Feature Extraction Feature Vector [0.98, 0.91, 0.73, ……] R B G B
31
Image descriptors Image Descriptor
32
32 Example: Histogram Image Corresponding histogram Frequency count of each individual color Most commonly used color feature representation Source: Andrade, D.
33
33 Texture Descriptors
34
34 Contour Saliences
35
35 Contour Segment Saliences
36
36 Multiscale Fractal Dimension Complex geometric shapes Defined by simple algorithms Non integer dimension Invariant under scaling
37
37 Multiscale Fractal Dimension (Experiments)
38
38 Introduced by Punam et al. in 2003. For a pixel p, it is the largest ellipse centered at p within the same homogeneous region. It extracts local structure information (thickness, orientation, and anisotropy). Tensor Scale Descriptor
39
39 0°0°180°90° Tensor Scale Image
40
40 Tensor Scale Image
41
41 Tensor Scale Descriptor
42
42 Tensor Scale Descriptor
43
43
44
44 A typical CBIR system Interface Query SpecificationVisualization Image Database Ranking Similarity Computation Query-processing Module Query Pattern Similar Images Feature Vector Extraction Feature Vectors Images Data Insertion
45
45 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
46
46 CBISC An OAI-compliant component that supports queries on image collections using content-based image retrieval May be customized to support different image collections
47
47 CBISC in ETANA
48
48 CBISC Descriptor Training
49
49 System’s Architecture Mediator Interface Data Insertion Module Query Processing Module GIS DBMS Geo. DB Metadata Image DB Databases
50
50 Content-Based Image Search Component (CBISC) OAI Eco Collection Metadata Taxonomic Trees Metadata-Based Search Component (ESSEX) Geographic Data Search Component (GDSC) Web Feature Server (WFS) Geo Collection MetadataMaps Image Collection Image Metadata Image Descriptors Images Image Collection Interface Query Specification Visualization Query Mediator Analysis Merging Execution BIS Manager HTTP Request (ListDescriptors) HTTP Request (GetImages) HTTP Request (keywords) HTTP Request (GetCapabilities) HTTP Request (GetFeatureType) HTTP Request (GetFeature)
51
51 CBISC Configuration Tool
52
52
53
53 Integrated support for SI applications in Biomedical Information Systems
54
54 SIERRA A tool that allows users to select parts of images and associate them with text annotations. Performs information retrieval as annotations and associated marks in two ways, either for: –images or marks similar (in content) to a specified image or mark –annotations containing specified query terms
55
55 Annotating an image
56
56 Searching over annotations
57
57 Searching over images/sub-images
58
58 DL services and tools drive quality Formal frameworks
59
59 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
60
60 The 5S framework A DL framework that defines constructs that lead to the definition of a minimal digital library Then, an archaeological DL Then, a practical DL Then, DL handling superimposed information... Plus, theory based Quality Models and Digital Librarian’s Quality Toolkit
61
61 The 5 S’s SsExamplesObjectives Streams Text; video; audio; image Describes properties of the DL content such as encoding and language for textual material or particular forms of multimedia data Structures Collection; catalog; hypertext; document; metadata Specifies organizational aspects of the DL content Spaces Measure; measurable, topological, vector, probabilistic Defines logical and presentational views of several DL components Scenarios Searching, browsing, recommending Details the behavior of DL services Societies Service managers, learners, teachers, etc. Defines managers, responsible for running DL services; actors, that use those services; and relationships among them
62
62
63
63 5S and DL formal definitions and compositions (April 2004 TOIS)
64
64 Digital Object Repository Collection Minimal DL Metadata Catalog Descriptive Metadata Specification A Minimal DL in the 5S Framework Structural Metadata Specification StreamsStructuresSpacesScenariosSocieties indexing browsing searching services hypertext Structured Stream
65
65 StreamsStructuresSpacesScenariosSocieties indexing browsing searching services hypertext Structured Stream Descriptive Metadata specification SpaTemOrg StraDia Arch Descriptive Metadata specification ArchDO ArchObj ArchColl Arch Metadata catalog ArchDColl ArchDR Minimal ArchDL A Minimal ArchDL in the 5S Framework
66
66 Formalizing CBIR services in DLs
67
67 Information model
68
68 Tools/Applications
69
5SQual: A Quality Assessment Tool for Digital Libraries
70
70 Digital Objects Metadata Services Completeness Conformance Accessibility Similarity Significanc e Timeliness Efficiency Reliability Numeric Indicators 5SQual - Dimensions
71
71 5SQual Archi- texture
72
Evaluations – XML Report
73
Evaluations – Charts
75
75 Outline Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
76
76 References (selected) Uma Murthy, Ricardo da Silva Torres, Edward A. Fox: SIERRA - A Superimposed Application for Enhanced Image Description and Retrieval. ECDL 2006: 540-543 Uma Murthy, Ricardo da Silva Torres, Edward A. Fox: Integrated Support for Superimposed Applications in Biomedical Information Systems, Virginia Tech, 2006 (for the National Library of Medicine), http://si.dlib.vt.edu/publications/NLMWhitePaperSI2.pdf. http://si.dlib.vt.edu/publications/NLMWhitePaperSI2.pdf M. A. Gonçalves. Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, and Societies: A Formal Framework for Digital Libraries and Its Applications: Defining a Quality Model for Digital Libraries (Chapter 8) – PHD thesis, Virginia Tech CS Dept., Blacksburg, VA, 2004. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd_12052004_135923/ M. A. Gonçalves, B. L. Moreira, E. A. Fox, L. T. Watson. What is a good digital library? - defining a quality model for digital libraries. To appear in Information Processing and Management, 2007. http://fox.cs.vt.edu/cv.htm
77
77 Summary Acknowledgements Digital Libraries Scenarios, Requirements Superimposed Information Content Based Information Retrieval CBISC, SIERRA Theory, Quality References Summary
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.